Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 6

1.

The SF-36 scales are not accurately summarised by independent physical and mental component scores.

Hann M, Reeves D.

Qual Life Res. 2008 Apr;17(3):413-23. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9310-0. Epub 2008 Feb 8.

PMID:
18259888
2.

What is the use? Application of the short form (SF) questionnaires for the evaluation of treatment effects.

Pelle AJ, Kupper N, Mols F, de Jonge P.

Qual Life Res. 2013 Aug;22(6):1225-30. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0266-8. Epub 2012 Sep 14. Review.

PMID:
22975926
3.

Associations between chronic disease, age and physical and mental health status.

Hopman WM, Harrison MB, Coo H, Friedberg E, Buchanan M, VanDenKerkhof EG.

Chronic Dis Can. 2009;29(3):108-16. Review.

4.

Health-related quality of life in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review.

Hudson M, Thombs BD, Steele R, Panopalis P, Newton E, Baron M; Canadian Scleroderma Research Group.

Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Aug 15;61(8):1112-20. doi: 10.1002/art.24676. Review.

5.

Scoring the SF-36 in Orthopaedics: A Brief Guide.

Laucis NC, Hays RD, Bhattacharyya T.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Oct 7;97(19):1628-34. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00030. Review.

6.

Are factor analytical techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36.

de Vet HC, Adèr HJ, Terwee CB, Pouwer F.

Qual Life Res. 2005 Jun;14(5):1203-18; dicussion 1219-21, 1223-4. Review.

PMID:
16047498

Supplemental Content

Support Center