Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 38

1.

In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.

Guyatt GH, Mills EJ, Elbourne D.

PLoS Med. 2008 Jan 3;5(1):e4. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050004.

2.

Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review.

Cook JA, Hislop J, Adewuyi TE, Harrild K, Altman DG, Ramsay CR, Fraser C, Buckley B, Fayers P, Harvey I, Briggs AH, Norrie JD, Fergusson D, Ford I, Vale LD.

Health Technol Assess. 2014 May;18(28):v-vi, 1-175. doi: 10.3310/hta18280. Review.

3.

Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature.

Gagnier JJ, Moher D, Boon H, Beyene J, Bombardier C.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Jul 30;12:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-111. Review.

4.

Interventions for bronchiectasis: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.

Welsh EJ, Evans DJ, Fowler SJ, Spencer S.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 14;(7):CD010337. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010337.pub2. Review.

PMID:
26171905
5.

Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Spineli LM, Pandis N, Salanti G.

Res Synth Methods. 2015 Jun;6(2):175-87. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1131. Epub 2015 Jan 26. Review.

PMID:
26099485
6.

Sample size calculation in clinical trials: part 13 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.

Röhrig B, du Prel JB, Wachtlin D, Kwiecien R, Blettner M.

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Aug;107(31-32):552-6. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0552. Epub 2010 Aug 9. Review.

8.

Design, operation, and interpretation of clinical trials.

Pihlstrom BL, Barnett ML.

J Dent Res. 2010 Aug;89(8):759-72. doi: 10.1177/0022034510374737. Epub 2010 Jun 25. Review.

PMID:
20581353
9.

[Systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Basic knowledge, strengths and weaknesses of an important tool for healthcare professionals].

Schnabel A, Kranke P.

Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2010 Jul;45(7-8):510-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262480. Epub 2010 Jul 21. Review. German.

PMID:
20665362
10.

Using evidence in pain practice: Part I: Assessing quality of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.

Chou R.

Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;9(5):518-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00422_1.x. Review.

PMID:
18346062
11.

Types of clinical studies. Systematic reviews.

Varandas T, Carneiro AV.

Rev Port Cardiol. 2006 Feb;25(2):233-46. Review. English, Portuguese.

12.

Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations.

Horvath AR, Pewsner D.

Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Apr;342(1-2):23-39. Review.

PMID:
15026264
13.

Methods of meta-analysis: an analysis.

Koretz RL.

Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2002 Sep;5(5):467-74. Review.

PMID:
12172468
14.

Systematic reviews as a tool for planning and interpreting trials.

Bath PM, Gray LJ.

Int J Stroke. 2009 Feb;4(1):23-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00235.x. Review.

PMID:
19236494
15.

Synthesizing medical evidence: systematic reviews and metaanalyses.

Barker FG 2nd, Carter BS.

Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Oct 15;19(4):E5. Review.

PMID:
16241107
16.

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.

Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, Hing C, Kwok CS, Pang C, Harvey I.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta14080. Review.

17.

Safety of regular formoterol or salmeterol in adults with asthma: an overview of Cochrane reviews.

Cates CJ, Wieland LS, Oleszczuk M, Kew KM.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 6;(2):CD010314. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010314.pub2. Review.

PMID:
24504983
18.

Sample size calculations for the design of health studies: a review of key concepts for non-statisticians.

Merrifield A, Smith W.

N S W Public Health Bull. 2012 Sep;23(7-8):142-7. doi: 10.1071/NB11017. Review.

19.

[Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of randomised trials in nephrology: theory and practice for interpreting level I evidence].

Strippoli GF, Manno C, Schena FP.

G Ital Nefrol. 2003 Nov-Dec;20(6):615-24. Review. Italian.

PMID:
14732915
20.

Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.

Ryan R, Santesso N, Lowe D, Hill S, Grimshaw J, Prictor M, Kaufman C, Cowie G, Taylor M.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3. Review.

PMID:
24777444

Supplemental Content

Support Center