Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 34

1.

Myocardial perfusion and function: single photon emission computed tomography.

Hansen CL, Goldstein RA, Akinboboye OO, Berman DS, Botvinick EH, Churchwell KB, Cooke CD, Corbett JR, Cullom SJ, Dahlberg ST, Druz RS, Ficaro EP, Galt JR, Garg RK, Germano G, Heller GV, Henzlova MJ, Hyun MC, Johnson LL, Mann A, McCallister BD Jr, Quaife RA, Ruddy TD, Sundaram SN, Taillefer R, Ward RP, Mahmarian JJ; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology..

J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):e39-60. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
18022099
2.

The present role of nuclear cardiology in clinical practice.

Clark AN, Beller GA.

Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005 Mar;49(1):43-58. Review.

3.

Adenosine stress protocols for myocardial perfusion imaging.

Bokhari S, Ficaro EP, McCallister BD Jr.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):415-6. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
17556176
4.

SPECT radionuclide angiography: it is time for a consensus statement.

Daou D.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007 Nov;34(11):1729-34. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
17579855
5.

Advances in technical aspects of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging.

Slomka PJ, Patton JA, Berman DS, Germano G.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):255-76. doi: 10.1007/s12350-009-9052-6. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
19242769
6.

Artifacts and pitfalls in myocardial perfusion imaging.

Burrell S, MacDonald A.

J Nucl Med Technol. 2006 Dec;34(4):193-211; quiz 212-4. Review.

7.

Pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging: a practical approach.

Miyamoto MI, Vernotico SL, Majmundar H, Thomas GS.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Apr;14(2):250-5. Review. No abstract available. Erratum in: J Nucl Cardiol. 2007Jul;14(4):628.

PMID:
17386388
8.

Myocardial perfusion imaging in the acute care setting.

Kontos MC.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 May-Jun;14(3 Suppl):S125-32. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
17556180
9.

Cardiology and the quality of medical practice. The Cardiology Working Group.

[No authors listed]

JAMA. 1991 Jan 23-30;265(4):482-5; discussion 496-8. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
1985234
10.

PET imaging in cardiology.

Chacko GN.

Hell J Nucl Med. 2005 Sep-Dec;8(3):140-4. Review.

PMID:
16390017
11.

Reporting nuclear cardiology: a joint position paper by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI).

Trägårdh E, Hesse B, Knuuti J, Flotats A, Kaufmann PA, Kitsiou A, Hacker M, Verberne HJ, Edenbrandt L, Delgado V, Donal E, Edvardsen T, Galderisi M, Habib G, Lancellotti P, Nieman K, Rosenhek R; EACVI., Agostini D, Gimelli A, Lindner O, Slart R, Ubleis C; EANM..

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;16(3):272-9. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu304. Review.

PMID:
25618478
12.

The clinical importance of electrocardiographic changes during pharmacologic stress testing with radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.

Cosmai EM, Heller GV.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):466-72. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
16084436
13.

Cost-effectiveness of myocardial perfusion imaging: a summary of the currently available literature.

Des Prez RD, Shaw LJ, Gillespie RL, Jaber WA, Noble GL, Soman P, Wolinsky DG, Williams KA.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2005 Nov-Dec;12(6):750-9. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
16344238
14.

Is coronary computed tomographic angiography the "gold standard" for coronary artery disease?

Hecht HS.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009 Sep-Oct;3(5):334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2009.05.015. Review.

PMID:
19648074
15.

Headache.

Jordan JE; Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging..

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Oct;28(9):1824-6. Review. No abstract available.

16.

[The clinical management guidelines of the Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Nuclear cardiology: the technical bases and clinical applications].

Candell Riera J, Castell Conesa J, Jurado López JA, López de Sá E, Nuño de la Rosa JA, Ortigosa Aso FJ, Valle Tudela V.

Rev Esp Cardiol. 1999 Nov;52(11):957-89. Review. Spanish.

17.

Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Shaw LJ, Hage FG, Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Iskandrian A.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Oct;19(5):1026-43. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9593-y. Review. No abstract available. Erratum in: J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Oct;19(5):1092-3.

PMID:
22760523
18.

Assessment of myocardial viability.

Travin MI, Bergmann SR.

Semin Nucl Med. 2005 Jan;35(1):2-16. Review.

PMID:
15645391
19.

The role of myocardial perfusion imaging in special populations: women, diabetics, and heart failure.

Mieres JH, Rosman DR, Shaw LJ.

Semin Nucl Med. 2005 Jan;35(1):52-61. Review.

PMID:
15645394
20.

Normal values and standardization of parameters in nuclear cardiology: Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine working group database.

Nakajima K, Matsumoto N, Kasai T, Matsuo S, Kiso K, Okuda K.

Ann Nucl Med. 2016 Apr;30(3):188-99. doi: 10.1007/s12149-016-1065-z. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center