Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 12

1.

Paired-end mapping reveals extensive structural variation in the human genome.

Korbel JO, Urban AE, Affourtit JP, Godwin B, Grubert F, Simons JF, Kim PM, Palejev D, Carriero NJ, Du L, Taillon BE, Chen Z, Tanzer A, Saunders AC, Chi J, Yang F, Carter NP, Hurles ME, Weissman SM, Harkins TT, Gerstein MB, Egholm M, Snyder M.

Science. 2007 Oct 19;318(5849):420-6. Epub 2007 Sep 27.

2.

Challenges in studying genomic structural variant formation mechanisms: the short-read dilemma and beyond.

Onishi-Seebacher M, Korbel JO.

Bioessays. 2011 Nov;33(11):840-50. doi: 10.1002/bies.201100075. Epub 2011 Sep 30. Review.

PMID:
21959584
3.

Human Structural Variation: Mechanisms of Chromosome Rearrangements.

Weckselblatt B, Rudd MK.

Trends Genet. 2015 Oct;31(10):587-99. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 Jul 22. Review.

4.

Geographic distribution and adaptive significance of genomic structural variants: an anthropological genetics perspective.

Eaaswarkhanth M, Pavlidis P, Gokcumen O.

Hum Biol. 2014 Fall;86(4):260-75. Review.

PMID:
25959693
5.

Progress in the detection of human genome structural variations.

WU X, XIAO H.

Sci China C Life Sci. 2009 Jun;52(6):560-7. doi: 10.1007/s11427-009-0078-4. Epub 2009 Jun 26. Review.

PMID:
19557334
6.

Insights into structural variations and genome rearrangements in prokaryotic genomes.

Periwal V, Scaria V.

Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 1;31(1):1-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu600. Epub 2014 Sep 4. Review.

PMID:
25189783
7.

Detection and interpretation of genomic structural variation in mammals.

Hall IM, Quinlan AR.

Methods Mol Biol. 2012;838:225-48. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-507-7_11. Review.

PMID:
22228015
8.

Identification of structural variation in mouse genomes.

Keane TM, Wong K, Adams DJ, Flint J, Reymond A, Yalcin B.

Front Genet. 2014 Jul 2;5:192. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00192. eCollection 2014. Review.

9.

Characterizing complex structural variation in germline and somatic genomes.

Quinlan AR, Hall IM.

Trends Genet. 2012 Jan;28(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Nov 15. Review.

10.

Integrated analysis of whole-genome paired-end and mate-pair sequencing data for identifying genomic structural variations in multiple myeloma.

Yang R, Chen L, Newman S, Gandhi K, Doho G, Moreno CS, Vertino PM, Bernal-Mizarchi L, Lonial S, Boise LH, Rossi M, Kowalski J, Qin ZS.

Cancer Inform. 2014 Sep 21;13(Suppl 2):49-53. doi: 10.4137/CIN.S13783. eCollection 2014. Review.

11.

Computational methods for optical mapping.

Mendelowitz L, Pop M.

Gigascience. 2014 Dec 30;3(1):33. doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-3-33. eCollection 2014. Review.

12.

Using large-scale genome variation cohorts to decipher the molecular mechanism of cancer.

Habermann N, Mardin BR, Yakneen S, Korbel JO.

C R Biol. 2016 Jul-Aug;339(7-8):308-13. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 Jun 21. Review.

PMID:
27342254

Supplemental Content

Support Center