Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 27

1.

Predicting the risk of a false-positive test for women following a mammography screening programme.

Njor SH, Olsen AH, Schwartz W, Vejborg I, Lynge E.

J Med Screen. 2007;14(2):94-7.

PMID:
17626709
2.

False-positive results in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review and survey of service screening programmes.

Hofvind S, Ponti A, Patnick J, Ascunce N, Njor S, Broeders M, Giordano L, Frigerio A, Törnberg S; EUNICE Project and Euroscreen Working Groups., Van Hal G, Martens P, Májek O, Danes J, von Euler-Chelpin M, Aasmaa A, Anttila A, Becker N, Péntek Z, Budai A, Mádai S, Fitzpatrick P, Mooney T, Zappa M, Ventura L, Scharpantgen A, Hofvind S, Seroczynski P, Morais A, Rodrigues V, Bento MJ, Gomes de Carvalho J, Natal C, Prieto M, Sánchez-Contador Escudero C, Zubizarreta Alberti R, Fernández Llanes SB, Ascunce N, Ederra Sanza M, Sarriugarte Irigoien G, Salas Trejo D, Ibáñez Cabanell J, Wiege M, Ohlsson G, Törnberg S, Korzeniewska M, de Wolf C, Fracheboud J, Patnick J, Lancucki L, Ducarroz S, Suonio E.

J Med Screen. 2012;19 Suppl 1:57-66. Review.

PMID:
22972811
3.

Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms.

Brewer NT, Salz T, Lillie SE.

Ann Intern Med. 2007 Apr 3;146(7):502-10. Review.

PMID:
17404352
4.

The debate over mass mammography: is it beneficial for women?

Dilhuydy MH, Barreau B.

Eur J Radiol. 1997 Feb;24(2):86-93. Review.

PMID:
9097050
5.

Reporting of performance indicators of mammography screening in Europe.

Lynge E, Olsen AH, Fracheboud J, Patnick J.

Eur J Cancer Prev. 2003 Jun;12(3):213-22. Review.

PMID:
12771560
6.

A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer.

Lord SJ, Lei W, Craft P, Cawson JN, Morris I, Walleser S, Griffiths A, Parker S, Houssami N.

Eur J Cancer. 2007 Sep;43(13):1905-17. Epub 2007 Aug 2. Review.

PMID:
17681781
7.

Screening mammography in women aged 40-49 years.

Rajkumar SV, Hartmann LC.

Medicine (Baltimore). 1999 Nov;78(6):410-6. Review.

8.

ABC of breast diseases: screening for breast cancer.

Blamey RW, Wilson AR, Patnick J.

BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):689-93. Review. No abstract available.

9.

Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer.

Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D.

Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 6;148(9):671-9. Review.

PMID:
18458280
10.

[Psychological consequences of breast cancer screening among healthy women].

von Bülow B.

Ugeskr Laeger. 2000 Feb 21;162(8):1053-9. Review. Danish.

PMID:
10741242
11.

False-positive results in breast cancer screening.

Evans MF.

Can Fam Physician. 1999 Jan;45:73-4. Review. No abstract available.

12.

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in screening women at high risk of breast cancer.

Warner E.

Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jun;19(3):163-9. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0b013e31818bc994. Review.

PMID:
18941396
13.

The importance of mammography screening in elderly women.

Sandstrom-Wakeling SK, Nied L, Gambino K, Zak M, Duffy E.

Nurse Pract. 2003 May;28(5):50-3. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
12792269
14.

Mammography screening in Denmark.

Vejborg I, Mikkelsen E, Garne JP, Bak M, Lernevall A, Mogensen NB, Schwartz W, Lynge E.

Dan Med Bull. 2011 Jun;58(6):C4287. Review.

PMID:
21651881
15.

Ductal lavage in the screening of high-risk women.

Kenney PJ, Ellison MC.

Curr Oncol Rep. 2004 Jan;6(1):69-73. Review.

PMID:
14664764
16.

Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.

Rosenberg K.

J Nurse Midwifery. 1998 Sep-Oct;43(5):394-5. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
9841258
17.

[The role of epidemiological quality parameters in a mammography screening programme].

Becker N.

Radiologe. 2006 Nov;46(11):984-92. Review. German.

PMID:
16177930
18.

One-view versus two-view mammography in baseline screening for breast cancer: a review.

van Dijck JA, Verbeek AL, Hendriks JH, Holland R.

Br J Radiol. 1992 Nov;65(779):971-6. Review.

PMID:
1450833
19.

Mammography screening from the perspective of quality of life: a review of the literature.

Hafslund B, Nortvedt MW.

Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Sep;23(3):539-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00634.x. Epub 2009 Jan 8. Review.

PMID:
19170959
20.

The UK breast cancer screening programme: an expensive mistake.

Rodgers A.

J Public Health Med. 1990;12(3-4):197-204. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
2128025

Supplemental Content

Support Center