Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 46

1.

Ocular higher-order aberrations features analysis after corneal refractive surgery.

Wang Y, Zhao KX, He JC, Jin Y, Zuo T.

Chin Med J (Engl). 2007 Feb 20;120(4):269-73.

PMID:
17374275
2.

LASIK vs LASEK vs PRK: advantages and indications.

Ambrósio R Jr, Wilson S.

Semin Ophthalmol. 2003 Mar;18(1):2-10. Review.

PMID:
12759854
3.

[Quantitative assessment of quality of vision].

Oshika T.

Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2004 Dec;108(12):770-807; discussion 808. Review. Japanese.

PMID:
15656087
4.

Corneal forward shift after excimer laser keratorefractive surgery.

Kamiya K, Oshika T.

Semin Ophthalmol. 2003 Mar;18(1):17-22. Review.

PMID:
12759856
5.

Laser refractive surgery: technological advance and tissue response.

Bansal AK, Veenashree MP.

Biosci Rep. 2001 Aug;21(4):491-512. Review.

PMID:
11900324
6.

Night vision disturbances after corneal refractive surgery.

Fan-Paul NI, Li J, Miller JS, Florakis GJ.

Surv Ophthalmol. 2002 Nov-Dec;47(6):533-46. Review.

PMID:
12504738
7.

Complications of laser-in-situ-keratomileusis.

Sridhar MS, Rao SK, Vajpayee RB, Aasuri MK, Hannush S, Sinha R.

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2002 Dec;50(4):265-82. Review.

8.

[Optical and physiological limits of wavefront-controlled keratectomy].

Wesemann W.

Ophthalmologe. 2004 May;101(5):521-36; quiz 537. Review. German.

PMID:
15181908
9.

[Monochromatic aberration in accommodation. Dynamic wavefront analysis].

Fritzsch M, Dawczynski J, Jurkutat S, Vollandt R, Strobel J.

Ophthalmologe. 2011 Jun;108(6):553-60. doi: 10.1007/s00347-011-2336-7. Review. German. Erratum in: Ophthalmologe. 2011 Oct;108(10):979. Jurkutat, S [added].

PMID:
21695608
10.

Quality of vision and patient satisfaction after LASIK.

Hammond SD Jr, Puri AK, Ambati BK.

Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004 Aug;15(4):328-32. Review.

PMID:
15232473
11.

Wound healing in the cornea: a review of refractive surgery complications and new prospects for therapy.

Netto MV, Mohan RR, Ambrósio R Jr, Hutcheon AE, Zieske JD, Wilson SE.

Cornea. 2005 Jul;24(5):509-22. Review.

PMID:
15968154
12.

Computerized corneal topography and its importance to wavefront technology.

Wilson SE, Ambrosio R.

Cornea. 2001 Jul;20(5):441-54. Review.

PMID:
11413395
13.

Corneal wound healing relevance to wavefront guided laser treatments.

Netto MV, Wilson SE.

Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2004 Jun;17(2):225-31, vii. Review.

PMID:
15207564
14.

Update on customized excimer ablations: recent developments reported in 2002.

Waheed S, Krueger RR.

Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003 Aug;14(4):198-202. Review.

PMID:
12888717
15.

Are changes in ocular aberrations with age a significant problem for refractive surgery?

Marcos S.

J Refract Surg. 2002 Sep-Oct;18(5):S572-8. Review.

PMID:
12361160
16.

Growth factors in corneal wound healing following refractive surgery: A review.

Baldwin HC, Marshall J.

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002 Jun;80(3):238-47. Review.

17.

Excimer laser surface ablation: a review of recent literature.

O'Brart DP.

Clin Exp Optom. 2014 Jan;97(1):12-7. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12061. Epub 2013 May 8. Review.

18.

Indications, results, and complications of LASIK.

Gimbel HV, Levy SG.

Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1998 Aug;9(4):3-8. Review.

PMID:
10387465
19.

Update on laser subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK).

Yee RW, Yee SB.

Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004 Aug;15(4):333-41. Review.

PMID:
15232474
20.

The resiliency of the corneal endothelium to refractive and intraocular surgery.

Edelhauser HF.

Cornea. 2000 May;19(3):263-73. Review.

PMID:
10832681

Supplemental Content

Support Center