Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 29

1.

What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography?

Yoshinaga K, Chow BJ, Williams K, Chen L, deKemp RA, Garrard L, Lok-Tin Szeto A, Aung M, Davies RA, Ruddy TD, Beanlands RS.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Sep 5;48(5):1029-39. Epub 2006 Aug 17.

2.

The prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise echocardiography: a meta-analysis.

Metz LD, Beattie M, Hom R, Redberg RF, Grady D, Fleischmann KE.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jan 16;49(2):227-37. Epub 2006 Dec 29. Review.

3.

Positron-emitting myocardial blood flow tracers and clinical potential.

Schindler TH.

Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 May-Jun;57(6):588-606. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 27. Review.

PMID:
25637500
4.

Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac positron emission tomography versus single photon emission computed tomography for coronary artery disease: a bivariate meta-analysis.

Parker MW, Iskandar A, Limone B, Perugini A, Kim H, Jones C, Calamari B, Coleman CI, Heller GV.

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Nov;5(6):700-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.978270. Epub 2012 Oct 10. Review.

5.

Cardiac PET perfusion: prognosis, risk stratification, and clinical management.

Dorbala S, Di Carli MF.

Semin Nucl Med. 2014 Sep;44(5):344-57. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2014.05.003. Review.

6.

Assessing clinical impact of myocardial perfusion studies: ischemia or other prognostic indicators?

Miller TD, Askew JW, Herrmann J.

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 Apr;16(4):465. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0465-8. Review.

PMID:
24585107
7.

Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mc Ardle BA, Dowsley TF, deKemp RA, Wells GA, Beanlands RS.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 30;60(18):1828-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.038. Epub 2012 Oct 3. Review.

8.

Generator-produced rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging-From basic aspects to clinical applications.

Yoshinaga K, Klein R, Tamaki N.

J Cardiol. 2010 Mar;55(2):163-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Feb 8. Review.

9.

Review: comparison of PET rubidium-82 with conventional SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Ghotbi AA, Kjaer A, Hasbak P.

Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014 May;34(3):163-70. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12083. Epub 2013 Sep 13. Review.

10.
11.

Rubidium-82 cardiac positron emission tomography imaging: an overview for the general cardiologist.

Dhar R, Ananthasubramaniam K.

Cardiol Rev. 2011 Sep-Oct;19(5):255-63. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e318224253e. Review.

PMID:
21808169
12.

Prognostic value of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in diabetic patients: a meta-analysis.

Acampa W, Cantoni V, Green R, Maio F, Daniele S, Nappi C, Gaudieri V, Punzo G, Petretta M, Cuocolo A.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2014 Oct;21(5):893-902; quiz 890-2, 903-5. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-9918-0. Epub 2014 Jun 13. Review.

PMID:
24925624
13.

Diabetes and coronary artery disease: the role of stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Wackers FJ.

Cleve Clin J Med. 2005 Jan;72(1):21-5, 29-33. Review.

PMID:
15691055
14.

Advances in rubidium PET and integrated imaging with CT angiography.

Smith MF.

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2008 Mar;10(2):135-41. Review.

PMID:
18417014
15.
16.

Stress myocardial perfusion imaging for assessing prognosis: an update.

Bourque JM, Beller GA.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Dec;4(12):1305-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.10.003. Review.

17.

Effective risk stratification of patients on the basis of myocardial perfusion SPECT is dependent on appropriate patient selection.

Alexander S, Doukky R.

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Jan;17(1):549. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0549-5. Review.

PMID:
25418932
18.

Cardiac positron emission tomography and the role of adenosine pharmacologic stress.

Bateman TM.

Am J Cardiol. 2004 Jul 22;94(2A):19D-24D; discussion 24D-25D. Review.

PMID:
15261128
19.

Research Progress on 18F-Labeled Agents for Imaging of Myocardial Perfusion with Positron Emission Tomography.

Mou T, Zhang X.

Molecules. 2017 Mar 30;22(4). pii: E562. doi: 10.3390/molecules22040562. Review.

20.

Quantitative myocardial blood flow with Rubidium-82 PET: a clinical perspective.

Hagemann CE, Ghotbi AA, Kjær A, Hasbak P.

Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Oct 12;5(5):457-68. eCollection 2015. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center