Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 93

1.

Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment.

Hollingworth W, Medina LS, Lenkinski RE, Shibata DK, Bernal B, Zurakowski D, Comstock B, Jarvik JG.

Acad Radiol. 2006 Jul;13(7):803-10.

PMID:
16777553
2.

Inter-examiner reliability of passive assessment of intervertebral motion in the cervical and lumbar spine: a systematic review.

van Trijffel E, Anderegg Q, Bossuyt PM, Lucas C.

Man Ther. 2005 Nov;10(4):256-69. Epub 2005 Jul 1. Review.

PMID:
15994114
3.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis of peripheral joints: quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy of conventional MRI.

Miller E, Roposch A, Uleryk E, Doria AS.

Acad Radiol. 2009 Jun;16(6):739-57. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.01.012. Review.

PMID:
19427982
4.

Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping tests: a systematic review of the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy in published studies.

Freeman K, Szczepura A, Osipenko L.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Feb;142(2):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.10.010. Epub 2008 Dec 9. Review.

PMID:
19081172
5.

Accuracy of ultrasound to identify chronic liver disease.

Allan R, Thoirs K, Phillips M.

World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul 28;16(28):3510-20. Review.

6.

Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests.

de Graaf I, Prak A, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Thomas S, Peul W, Koes B.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 May 1;31(10):1168-76. Review.

PMID:
16648755
7.
8.

A systematic review identifies five "red flags" to screen for vertebral fracture in patients with low back pain.

Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.013. Epub 2007 Aug 27. Review.

PMID:
18177783
9.

A toxicologist's guide to studying diagnostic tests.

Bailey B, Amre DK.

Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2005;43(3):171-9. Review.

PMID:
15902791
10.

Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies.

Tatsioni A, Zarin DA, Aronson N, Samson DJ, Flamm CR, Schmid C, Lau J.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1048-55. Review.

PMID:
15968029
11.

An updated systematic review of the diagnostic utility of selective nerve root blocks.

Datta S, Everett CR, Trescot AM, Schultz DM, Adlaka R, Abdi S, Atluri SL, Smith HS, Shah RV.

Pain Physician. 2007 Jan;10(1):113-28. Review.

12.

A systematic literature review of magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the characterization of brain tumors.

Hollingworth W, Medina LS, Lenkinski RE, Shibata DK, Bernal B, Zurakowski D, Comstock B, Jarvik JG.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Aug;27(7):1404-11. Review.

13.

The methodological quality of diagnostic test accuracy studies for musculoskeletal conditions can be improved.

Henschke N, Keuerleber J, Ferreira M, Maher CG, Verhagen AP.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):416-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.008. Review.

PMID:
24581295
14.

Methodological quality and outcomes of studies addressing manual cervical spine examinations: a review.

Hollerwöger D.

Man Ther. 2006 May;11(2):93-8. Epub 2006 Feb 17. Review.

PMID:
16483829
15.

The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.

Buckley S, Coleman J, Davison I, Khan KS, Zamora J, Malick S, Morley D, Pollard D, Ashcroft T, Popovic C, Sayers J.

Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897. Review.

PMID:
19404891
16.

A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools.

Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Dinnes J, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jan;58(1):1-12. Review.

PMID:
15649665
17.

Systematic review of diagnostic utility of facet (zygapophysial) joint injections in chronic spinal pain: an update.

Sehgal N, Dunbar EE, Shah RV, Colson J.

Pain Physician. 2007 Jan;10(1):213-28. Review.

18.

Inter-rater reliability of case-note audit: a systematic review.

Lilford R, Edwards A, Girling A, Hofer T, Di Tanna GL, Petty J, Nicholl J.

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Jul;12(3):173-80. Review.

PMID:
17716421
19.

How does study quality affect the results of a diagnostic meta-analysis?

Westwood ME, Whiting PF, Kleijnen J.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Jun 8;5:20. Review.

20.

Optical coherence tomography versus stereoscopic fundus photography or biomicroscopy for diagnosing diabetic macular edema: a systematic review.

Virgili G, Menchini F, Dimastrogiovanni AF, Rapizzi E, Menchini U, Bandello F, Chiodini RG.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Nov;48(11):4963-73. Review.

PMID:
17962446

Supplemental Content

Support Center