Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 24

1.

Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.

Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L.

JAMA. 2006 Feb 8;295(6):676-80.

PMID:
16467236
2.

Publication bias in meta-analyses of the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions for schizophrenia.

Niemeyer H, Musch J, Pietrowsky R.

Schizophr Res. 2012 Jul;138(2-3):103-12. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.03.023. Epub 2012 Apr 6. Review.

PMID:
22484024
3.

Statistical controversies in clinical research: publication bias evaluations are not routinely conducted in clinical oncology systematic reviews.

Herrmann D, Sinnett P, Holmes J, Khan S, Koller C, Vassar M.

Ann Oncol. 2017 May 1;28(5):931-937. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw691. Review.

PMID:
28039176
4.

Assessing small study effects and publication bias in orthodontic meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study.

Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA, Athanasiou AE.

Clin Oral Investig. 2014 May;18(4):1031-1044. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1196-3. Epub 2014 Feb 14. Review.

PMID:
24526347
5.

Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the 'trim and fill' method.

Jennions MD, Møller AP.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 May;77(2):211-22. Review.

PMID:
12056747
6.

Detection of human papillomavirus in lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Syrjänen K.

Anticancer Res. 2012 Aug;32(8):3235-50. Review.

PMID:
22843898
7.

Anticariogenic effect of xylitol versus fluoride - a quantitative systematic review of clinical trials.

Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V.

Int Dent J. 2012 Feb;62(1):6-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00086.x. Review.

PMID:
22251032
8.

Geographic origin is a significant determinant of human papillomavirus prevalence in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Syrjänen K.

Scand J Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;45(1):1-18. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2012.702281. Epub 2012 Jul 25. Review.

PMID:
22830571
9.

Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications.

Moreno SG, Sutton AJ, Turner EH, Abrams KR, Cooper NJ, Palmer TM, Ades AE.

BMJ. 2009 Aug 7;339:b2981. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2981. Review.

10.

Assessment of publication bias in meta-analyses of cardiovascular diseases.

Palma S, Delgado-Rodriguez M.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Oct;59(10):864-9. Review.

11.

Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.

Ioannidis JP.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):951-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00986.x. Review.

PMID:
19018930
12.

Significant discrepancies were found in pooled estimates of searching with Chinese indexes versus searching with English indexes.

Xue J, Chen W, Chen L, Gaudet L, Moher D, Walker M, Wen SW.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;70:246-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.09.014. Epub 2015 Sep 26. Review.

PMID:
26410113
13.

[Meta-analyses or megatrials: same level of proof?].

Mismetti P, Cucherat M, Laporte S.

Presse Med. 2007 Mar;36(3 Pt 2):524-30. Epub 2007 Feb 1. Review. French.

PMID:
17275251
14.

Effect of xylitol versus sorbitol: a quantitative systematic review of clinical trials.

Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V.

Int Dent J. 2012 Aug;62(4):175-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00113.x. Epub 2012 Mar 9. Review.

PMID:
23016999
15.

High serum uric acid and increased risk of type 2 diabetes: a systemic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Lv Q, Meng XF, He FF, Chen S, Su H, Xiong J, Gao P, Tian XJ, Liu JS, Zhu ZH, Huang K, Zhang C.

PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056864. Epub 2013 Feb 20. Review.

16.

Frequency-risk and duration-risk relationships between aspirin use and gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ye X, Fu J, Yang Y, Gao Y, Liu L, Chen S.

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 30;8(7):e71522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071522. Print 2013. Review.

17.

Meta-analysis of the association between secondhand smoke exposure and stroke.

Oono IP, Mackay DF, Pell JP.

J Public Health (Oxf). 2011 Dec;33(4):496-502. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr025. Epub 2011 Mar 21. Review.

PMID:
21422014
18.

Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.

Anglemyer A, Horvath HT, Bero L.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;(4):MR000034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub2. Review.

PMID:
24782322
19.

Comparison of different regimens of proton pump inhibitors for acute peptic ulcer bleeding.

Neumann I, Letelier LM, Rada G, Claro JC, Martin J, Howden CW, Yuan Y, Leontiadis GI.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 12;(6):CD007999. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007999.pub2. Review.

PMID:
23760821
20.

Exploring and accounting for publication bias in mental health: a brief overview of methods.

Mavridis D, Salanti G.

Evid Based Ment Health. 2014 Feb;17(1):11-5. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101700. Review.

PMID:
24477532

Supplemental Content

Support Center