Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 15

1.
2.

The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.

Buckley S, Coleman J, Davison I, Khan KS, Zamora J, Malick S, Morley D, Pollard D, Ashcroft T, Popovic C, Sayers J.

Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897. Review.

PMID:
19404891
3.

A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8.

Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M, Prideaux D.

Med Teach. 2006 Sep;28(6):497-526. Review.

PMID:
17074699
4.

Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care.

Fung CH, Lim YW, Mattke S, Damberg C, Shekelle PG.

Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 15;148(2):111-23. Review.

PMID:
18195336
5.

Quality of professional society guidelines and consensus conference statements in critical care.

Sinuff T, Patel RV, Adhikari NK, Meade MO, Sch√ľnemann HJ, Cook DJ.

Crit Care Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):1049-58. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31816a01ec. Review.

PMID:
18379228
6.

Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project.

Davidoff F, Batalden P, Stevens D, Ogrinc G, Mooney S; SQUIRE Development Group.

Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Oct;17 Suppl 1:i3-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029066.

7.

Review of occupational medicine practice guidelines for interventional pain management and potential implications.

Manchikanti L, Singh V, Derby R, Helm S 2nd, Trescot AM, Staats PS, Prager JP, Hirsch JA.

Pain Physician. 2008 May-Jun;11(3):271-89. Review.

8.

Intensive care unit quality improvement: a "how-to" guide for the interdisciplinary team.

Curtis JR, Cook DJ, Wall RJ, Angus DC, Bion J, Kacmarek R, Kane-Gill SL, Kirchhoff KT, Levy M, Mitchell PH, Moreno R, Pronovost P, Puntillo K.

Crit Care Med. 2006 Jan;34(1):211-8. Review.

PMID:
16374176
9.

The slippery slope: differentiating between quality improvement and research.

Newhouse RP, Pettit JC, Poe S, Rocco L.

J Nurs Adm. 2006 Apr;36(4):211-9. Review.

PMID:
16609344
10.

Peer reviewing e-learning: opportunities, challenges, and solutions.

Ruiz JG, Candler C, Teasdale TA.

Acad Med. 2007 May;82(5):503-7. Review.

PMID:
17457075
12.

SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.

Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D.

Can J Diabetes. 2015 Oct;39(5):434-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.08.001. Review.

PMID:
26443286
13.

Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project.

Davidoff F, Batalden P, Stevens D, Ogrinc G, Mooney S; Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence Development Group.

J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Dec;23(12):2125-30. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0797-4. Epub 2008 Oct 2. Review. Erratum in: J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jan;24(1):147.

14.

Recommendations for the ethical conduct of quality improvement.

Fox E, Tulsky JA.

J Clin Ethics. 2005 Spring;16(1):61-71. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
15915847
15.

[Scholarly communication in the digital era: has a new era really begun?].

Marocco A.

Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2004;40(3):353-6. Review. Italian.

Supplemental Content

Support Center