Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 31

1.

Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract.

Nakayama T, Hirai N, Yamazaki S, Naito M.

J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Apr;93(2):237-42.

2.

Structured and unstructured abstracts in journal articles: a review.

Fatiregun AA, Asuzu MC.

Niger Postgrad Med J. 2003 Sep;10(3):197-200. Review.

PMID:
14692066
3.

Current findings from research on structured abstracts.

Hartley J.

J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Jul;92(3):368-71. Review.

4.

Writing a research abstract: eloquence in miniature.

Papanas N, Georgiadis GS, Maltezos E, Lazarides MK.

Int Angiol. 2012 Jun;31(3):297-302. Review.

PMID:
22634986
5.

The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.

Berwanger O, Ribeiro RA, Finkelsztejn A, Watanabe M, Suzumura EA, Duncan BB, Devereaux PJ, Cook D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Nov 17. Review.

PMID:
19010643
6.

CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration.

Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, Wager E, Middleton P, Altman DG, Schulz KF; CONSORT Group.

PLoS Med. 2008 Jan 22;5(1):e20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050020.

7.

More informative abstracts revisited.

Haynes RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ, Altman DG, Gardner MJ.

Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jul 1;113(1):69-76. Review.

PMID:
2190518
8.
9.

More informative abstracts revisited.

Haynes RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ, Altman DG, Gardner MJ.

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996 Jan;33(1):1-9. Review.

PMID:
8849853
10.

[The Institute for Scientific Information journal selection criteria. Its application to Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología].

Ruiz-Pérez R, Delgado López-Cózar E, Jiménez-Contreras E.

Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2006 May;81(5):245-68. Review. Spanish.

PMID:
16752317
11.

Retraction policies of high-impact biomedical journals.

Atlas MC.

J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Apr;92(2):242-50. Review.

12.

What makes a high quality clinical research paper?

Groves T.

Oral Dis. 2010 May;16(4):313-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01663.x. Epub 2010 Mar 9. Review.

PMID:
20233312
13.

Abstracts in high profile journals often fail to report harm.

Bernal-Delgado E, Fisher ES.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Mar 27;8:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-14. Review.

14.

Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature.

Andersen J, Belmont J, Cho CT.

J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2006 Dec;39(6):436-43. Review.

PMID:
17164944
15.
16.

PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts.

Beller EM, Glasziou PP, Altman DG, Hopewell S, Bastian H, Chalmers I, Gøtzsche PC, Lasserson T, Tovey D; PRISMA for Abstracts Group.

PLoS Med. 2013;10(4):e1001419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001419. Epub 2013 Apr 9.

17.

Effects of technical editing in biomedical journals: a systematic review.

Wager E, Middleton P.

JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2821-4. Review.

PMID:
12038923
18.

[How to write an abstract for a scientific publication or communication].

Velasco Rodríguez MJ, Rodríguez Del Aguila MM, Sordo Del Castillo L, Pérez Vicente S.

Med Clin (Barc). 2008 Nov 8;131(16):614-6. Review. Spanish. No abstract available.

PMID:
19080853
19.

Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, Hooft L, Bossuyt PM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;68(6):708-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Jan 28. Review.

PMID:
25703213
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center