Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 20

1.

Accuracy of ICD-9-CM codes for identifying cardiovascular and stroke risk factors.

Birman-Deych E, Waterman AD, Yan Y, Nilasena DS, Radford MJ, Gage BF.

Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):480-5.

PMID:
15838413
2.

Stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of stroke risk factors, risk stratification schema and cost effectiveness data.

Hughes M, Lip GY; Guideline Development Group, National Clinical Guideline for Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Primary and Secondary Care, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence..

Thromb Haemost. 2008 Feb;99(2):295-304. doi: 10.1160/TH07-08-0508. Review.

PMID:
18278178
3.

A systematic review of validated methods for identifying orthopedic implant removal and revision using administrative data.

Singh JA, Kundukulam JA, Bhandari M.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Jan;21 Suppl 1:265-73. doi: 10.1002/pds.2309. Review.

PMID:
22262616
4.

The risk of hospitalization for ischemic stroke among older adults.

Wolinsky FD, Wan GJ, Gurney JG, Bentley DW.

Med Care. 1998 Apr;36(4):449-61. Review.

PMID:
9544586
5.

A systematic review of validated methods for identifying pancreatitis using administrative data.

Moores K, Gilchrist B, Carnahan R, Abrams T.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Jan;21 Suppl 1:194-202. doi: 10.1002/pds.2334. Review.

PMID:
22262606
6.

Administrative data have high variation in validity for recording heart failure.

Quach S, Blais C, Quan H.

Can J Cardiol. 2010 Oct;26(8):306-12. Review.

7.

Accuracy of Electronic Health Record Data for Identifying Stroke Cases in Large-Scale Epidemiological Studies: A Systematic Review from the UK Biobank Stroke Outcomes Group.

Woodfield R, Grant I; UK Biobank Stroke Outcomes Group.; UK Biobank Follow-Up and Outcomes Working Group., Sudlow CL.

PLoS One. 2015 Oct 23;10(10):e0140533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140533. Review.

8.

Validation of the CHADS2 clinical prediction rule to predict ischaemic stroke. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Keogh C, Wallace E, Dillon C, Dimitrov BD, Fahey T.

Thromb Haemost. 2011 Sep;106(3):528-38. doi: 10.1160/TH11-02-0061. Review.

PMID:
21800003
9.

Identifying patients with severe sepsis using administrative claims: patient-level validation of the angus implementation of the international consensus conference definition of severe sepsis.

Iwashyna TJ, Odden A, Rohde J, Bonham C, Kuhn L, Malani P, Chen L, Flanders S.

Med Care. 2014 Jun;52(6):e39-43. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318268ac86.

10.

AHA Guidelines for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke: 2002 Update: Consensus Panel Guide to Comprehensive Risk Reduction for Adult Patients Without Coronary or Other Atherosclerotic Vascular Diseases. American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee.

Pearson TA, Blair SN, Daniels SR, Eckel RH, Fair JM, Fortmann SP, Franklin BA, Goldstein LB, Greenland P, Grundy SM, Hong Y, Miller NH, Lauer RM, Ockene IS, Sacco RL, Sallis JF Jr, Smith SC Jr, Stone NJ, Taubert KA.

Circulation. 2002 Jul 16;106(3):388-91. Review. No abstract available.

11.

Impact of the principal stroke risk factors on human movements.

O'Reilly C, Plamondon R.

Hum Mov Sci. 2011 Aug;30(4):792-806. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.07.010. Review.

PMID:
20888057
12.

Strengthening the standards for preventing heart disease and stroke: the recent AHA guidelines.

Seballos RJ, Gutierrez J.

Cleve Clin J Med. 2004 May;71(5):426-32. Review.

PMID:
15195777
13.

[Old and new scoring systems for assessing cardiovascular risks: problems with the validity, the precision and the homogenicity of the risk categories].

Smulders YM, Spijkerman AM, Kostense PJ, Bouter LM, Stehouwer CD.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004 Dec 11;148(50):2480-4. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
15638194
14.

Evaluating cardiovascular risk assessment for asymptomatic people.

Scott IA.

BMJ. 2009 Jan 5;338:a2844. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2844. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
19124547
15.

The epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in women.

Redberg R.

Manag Care Interface. 2000;Suppl A:6-9, 17. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
10788021
16.

Cardioprotection: what is it? Who needs it?

Kannel WB.

Am J Manag Care. 2002 Jun;8(9 Suppl):5-12. Review. No abstract available.

17.

Conducting Retrospective Ontological Clinical Trials in ICD-9-CM in the Age of ICD-10-CM.

Venepalli NK, Shergill A, Dorestani P, Boyd AD.

Cancer Inform. 2014 Nov 9;13(Suppl 3):81-8. doi: 10.4137/CIN.S14032. Review.

18.

[Difficulties to forecast the risk of stroke].

Tuomilehto J.

Duodecim. 2002;118(24):2527-30. Review. Finnish. No abstract available.

PMID:
12572288
19.

How valuable is physical examination of the cardiovascular system?

Elder A, Japp A, Verghese A.

BMJ. 2016 Jul 27;354:i3309. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3309. Review.

20.

[Cardiovascular diseases and modern prospects for preventing stroke].

Eliseev OM, Oshchepkova EV.

Ter Arkh. 2002;74(9):73-8. Review. Russian. No abstract available.

PMID:
12418127

Supplemental Content

Support Center