Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 36

1.

Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis.

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Mar;45(3):255-65.

PMID:
1569422
2.

Exploratory or analytic meta-analysis: should we distinguish between them?

Anello C, Fleiss JL.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;48(1):109-16; discussion 117-8. Review.

PMID:
7853037
3.

Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned.

Herbison P, Hay-Smith J, Gillespie WJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;59(12):1249-56. Epub 2006 Sep 11. Review.

PMID:
17098567
4.

Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials: the need for complete data.

Clarke MJ, Stewart LA.

J Eval Clin Pract. 1995 Nov;1(2):119-26. Review.

PMID:
9238566
5.

Meta-analysis: an update.

Sacks HS, Reitman D, Pagano D, Kupelnick B.

Mt Sinai J Med. 1996 May-Sep;63(3-4):216-24. Review.

PMID:
8692168
6.

Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses.

Engels EA, Schmid CH, Terrin N, Olkin I, Lau J.

Stat Med. 2000 Jul 15;19(13):1707-28. Review.

PMID:
10861773
7.

Meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials: how to improve their quality?

Pignon JP, Arriagada R.

Lung Cancer. 1994 Mar;10 Suppl 1:S135-41. Review.

PMID:
8087502
8.

Review article: critical review of meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials in hepatogastroenterology.

Auperin A, Pignon JP, Poynard T.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Apr;11(2):215-25. Review.

9.

Systematic reviews--theory and practice.

Ohlsson A.

Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 1994;219:25-32. Review.

PMID:
7701235
10.

Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.

Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, Petticrew M, Altman DG; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group; European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group.

Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(27):iii-x, 1-173. Review.

11.

Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery.

Gurusamy KS, Gluud C, Nikolova D, Davidson BR.

Br J Surg. 2009 Apr;96(4):342-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6558. Review.

PMID:
19283747
12.

Basic concepts in meta-analysis: A primer for clinicians.

Khoshdel A, Attia J, Carney SL.

Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Oct;60(10):1287-94. Review.

PMID:
16981972
13.
14.

[The evaluation of the quality of clinical trials: the rationale, usefulness and drawbacks].

García López FJ, Gutiérrez Bezón S, Galende Domínguez I, Avendaño Solá C.

Med Clin (Barc). 1999;112 Suppl 1:35-42. Review. Spanish.

PMID:
10618798
15.

Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.

Brookes ST, Whitley E, Peters TJ, Mulheran PA, Egger M, Davey Smith G.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(33):1-56. Review.

16.

Collaborative worldwide overviews of randomized trials.

Sandercock P.

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:149-54; discussion 154-5. Review.

PMID:
8192292
17.
18.

Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Shepherd J, Jones J, Frampton GK, Tanajewski L, Turner D, Price A.

Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. Review.

19.

Interpretation of data from multiple trials: a critical review.

Conn HO.

J Intern Med. 1997 Mar;241(3):177-83. Review.

20.

Evidence-based medicine: its effect on treatment recommendations as illustrated by the changing role of postmastectomy irradiation to treat breast cancer.

Levitt SH, Aeppli D, Nierengarten MB.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Mar 1;55(3):645-50. Review.

PMID:
12573751

Supplemental Content

Support Center