Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 37

1.

Evidence-based assessment: evaluation of the formocresol versus ferric sulfate primary molar pulpotomy.

Loh A, O'Hoy P, Tran X, Charles R, Hughes A, Kubo K, Messer LB.

Pediatr Dent. 2004 Sep-Oct;26(5):401-9.

PMID:
15460294
2.

Mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulpotomy medicament: an evidence-based assessment.

Ng FK, Messer LB.

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2008 Jun;9(2):58-73. Review.

PMID:
18534173
3.

Primary molar pulpotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Lin PY, Chen HS, Wang YH, Tu YK.

J Dent. 2014 Sep;42(9):1060-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Feb 7. Review.

PMID:
24513112
4.

Evaluation of formocresol versus ferric sulphate primary molar pulpotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Peng L, Ye L, Guo X, Tan H, Zhou X, Wang C, Li R.

Int Endod J. 2007 Oct;40(10):751-7. Epub 2007 Aug 22. Review.

PMID:
17714467
5.

Evaluation of the formocresol versus mineral trioxide aggregate primary molar pulpotomy: a meta-analysis.

Peng L, Ye L, Tan H, Zhou X.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Dec;102(6):e40-4. Epub 2006 Sep 26. Review.

PMID:
17138165
6.

Evidence of pulpotomy in primary teeth comparing MTA, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulphate, and electrosurgery with formocresol.

Stringhini Junior E, Vitcel ME, Oliveira LB.

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015 Aug;16(4):303-12. doi: 10.1007/s40368-015-0174-z. Epub 2015 Apr 2. Review.

PMID:
25833280
7.

MTA and ferric sulfate in pulpotomy outcomes of primary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Asgary S, Shirvani A, Fazlyab M.

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Fall;39(1):1-8. Review.

PMID:
25631717
8.

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth.

Nadin G, Goel BR, Yeung CA, Glenny AM.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD003220. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8:CD003220.

PMID:
12535462
9.
10.

Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: new directions and treatment perspectives.

Fuks AB.

J Endod. 2008 Jul;34(7 Suppl):S18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.031. Review.

PMID:
18565366
11.

Formocresol and alternative primary molar pulpotomy medicaments: a review.

Waterhouse PJ.

Endod Dent Traumatol. 1995 Aug;11(4):157-62. Review.

PMID:
7588337
12.

Mineral trioxide aggregate versus formocresol pulpotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Shirvani A, Asgary S.

Clin Oral Investig. 2014 May;18(4):1023-30. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1189-2. Epub 2014 Jan 23. Review.

PMID:
24452827
13.

Evidence-based review of clinical studies on pulpotomy.

[No authors listed]

J Endod. 2009 Aug;35(8):1116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.05.014. Review.

PMID:
19631845
15.

The obsolescence of formocresol.

Lewis B.

J Calif Dent Assoc. 2010 Feb;38(2):102-7. Review.

PMID:
20232688
16.

Pulpotomy in primary teeth: review of the literature according to standardized criteria.

Fuks AB, Papagiannoulis L.

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006 Jun;7(2):64-71; discussion 72. Review.

PMID:
17140530
17.

Mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulpotomy medicament: a narrative review.

Ng FK, Messer LB.

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2008 Mar;9(1):4-11. Review.

PMID:
18328232
18.

[Formocresol pulpotomy: current status].

Marini LA.

Rev Odontol P R. 1985 Jan-Jul;22(1):44-9. Review. Spanish. No abstract available.

PMID:
3915585
19.

Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Shepherd J, Jones J, Frampton GK, Tanajewski L, Turner D, Price A.

Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. Review.

20.

Indirect pulp capping and primary teeth: is the primary tooth pulpotomy out of date?

Coll JA.

Pediatr Dent. 2008 May-Jun;30(3):230-6. Review.

PMID:
18615989

Supplemental Content

Support Center