Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 19

1.
2.

Current trauma scoring systems and their applications.

Van Camp LA, Delooz HH.

Eur J Emerg Med. 1998 Sep;5(3):341-53. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
9827839
4.
5.

Mathematical tools for demonstrating the clinical usefulness of biochemical markers.

Boyd JC.

Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 1997;227:46-63. Review.

PMID:
9127468
6.

Performance of International Classification of Diseases-based injury severity measures used to predict in-hospital mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gagné M, Moore L, Beaudoin C, Batomen Kuimi BL, Sirois MJ.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Mar;80(3):419-26. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000944. Review.

PMID:
26713976
7.

The epidemic of penetrating trauma: a national dilemma.

Lacqua MJ, Sahdev P.

J Emerg Med. 1993 Nov-Dec;11(6):747-52. Review.

PMID:
8157914
8.

Is the revised trauma score still useful?

Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA, Finch CF.

ANZ J Surg. 2003 Nov;73(11):944-8. Review.

PMID:
14616576
9.

Statistical evaluation of prognostic versus diagnostic models: beyond the ROC curve.

Cook NR.

Clin Chem. 2008 Jan;54(1):17-23. Epub 2007 Nov 16. Review.

10.

Probability of Survival Scores in Different Trauma Registries: A Systematic Review.

Stoica B, Paun S, Tanase I, Negoi I, Chiotoroiu A, Beuran M; -.

Chirurgia (Bucur). 2016 Mar-Apr;111(2):115-9. Review.

11.

Influence of the National Trauma Data Bank on the study of trauma outcomes: is it time to set research best practices to further enhance its impact?

Haider AH, Saleem T, Leow JJ, Villegas CV, Kisat M, Schneider EB, Haut ER, Stevens KA, Cornwell EE 3rd, MacKenzie EJ, Efron DT.

J Am Coll Surg. 2012 May;214(5):756-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.013. Epub 2012 Feb 7. Review.

12.

Quantifying prognosis with risk predictions.

Pace NL, Eberhart LH, Kranke PR.

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Jan;29(1):7-16. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834d9474. Review.

PMID:
22089517
13.

Assessment of claims of improved prediction beyond the Framingham risk score.

Tzoulaki I, Liberopoulos G, Ioannidis JP.

JAMA. 2009 Dec 2;302(21):2345-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1757. Review.

PMID:
19952321
14.

Analysis of biomarker data: logs, odds ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves.

Grund B, Sabin C.

Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2010 Nov;5(6):473-9. doi: 10.1097/COH.0b013e32833ed742. Review.

15.

Historical controls and modern survival analysis.

Keiding N.

Lifetime Data Anal. 1995;1(1):19-25. Review.

PMID:
9385088
16.

Interpreting the literature in obstetrics and gynecology: II. Logistic regression and related issues.

Peterson HB, Kleinbaum DG.

Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;78(4):717-20. Review.

PMID:
1923180
17.

Evaluation of models that predict short-term outcome after traumatic brain injury.

Xu XY, Liu WG, Yang XF, Li LQ.

Brain Inj. 2007 Jun;21(6):575-82. Review.

PMID:
17577708
18.

[Unconditioned logistic regression and sample size: a bibliographic review].

Ortega Calvo M, Cayuela Domínguez A.

Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2002 Mar-Apr;76(2):85-93. Review. Spanish.

19.

[Predicting chance of disease: calculation using prediction rules].

Verbeek AJ, Verbeek JF, van Dijck JA, Verbeek AL.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A7041. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
25115204

Supplemental Content

Support Center