Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 20

1.

DNA end joining becomes less efficient and more error-prone during cellular senescence.

Seluanov A, Mittelman D, Pereira-Smith OM, Wilson JH, Gorbunova V.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 18;101(20):7624-9.

2.

Making ends meet in old age: DSB repair and aging.

Gorbunova V, Seluanov A.

Mech Ageing Dev. 2005 Jun-Jul;126(6-7):621-8. Review.

PMID:
15888314
3.

[Double strand break repair, one mechanism can hide another: alternative non-homologous end joining].

Rass E, Grabarz A, Bertrand P, Lopez BS.

Cancer Radiother. 2012 Feb;16(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2011.05.004. Review. French.

PMID:
21737335
4.

Mechanisms of DNA double strand break repair and chromosome aberration formation.

Iliakis G, Wang H, Perrault AR, Boecker W, Rosidi B, Windhofer F, Wu W, Guan J, Terzoudi G, Pantelias G.

Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004;104(1-4):14-20. Review.

PMID:
15162010
7.

Double-strand break repair-adox: Restoration of suppressed double-strand break repair during mitosis induces genomic instability.

Terasawa M, Shinohara A, Shinohara M.

Cancer Sci. 2014 Dec;105(12):1519-25. doi: 10.1111/cas.12551. Review.

8.

Analysis of DNA double-strand break repair pathways in mice.

Brugmans L, Kanaar R, Essers J.

Mutat Res. 2007 Jan 3;614(1-2):95-108. Review.

PMID:
16797606
9.

Induction and repair of DNA double strand breaks: the increasing spectrum of non-homologous end joining pathways.

Mladenov E, Iliakis G.

Mutat Res. 2011 Jun 3;711(1-2):61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.02.005. Review.

PMID:
21329706
10.

Repair Pathway Choices and Consequences at the Double-Strand Break.

Ceccaldi R, Rondinelli B, D'Andrea AD.

Trends Cell Biol. 2016 Jan;26(1):52-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.07.009. Review.

PMID:
26437586
11.

DNA double-strand break repair: all's well that ends well.

Wyman C, Kanaar R.

Annu Rev Genet. 2006;40:363-83. Review.

PMID:
16895466
12.

Cancer, aging and cellular senescence.

Campisi J.

In Vivo. 2000 Jan-Feb;14(1):183-8. Review.

PMID:
10757076
14.

Is non-homologous end-joining really an inherently error-prone process?

BĂ©termier M, Bertrand P, Lopez BS.

PLoS Genet. 2014 Jan;10(1):e1004086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004086. Review.

15.
16.

The mammalian XRCC genes: their roles in DNA repair and genetic stability.

Thacker J, Zdzienicka MZ.

DNA Repair (Amst). 2003 Jun 11;2(6):655-72. Review.

PMID:
12767346
17.

Genomic instability in myeloid malignancies: increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and error-prone repair.

Sallmyr A, Fan J, Rassool FV.

Cancer Lett. 2008 Oct 18;270(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.03.036. Review.

PMID:
18467025
18.

Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice.

Shrivastav M, De Haro LP, Nickoloff JA.

Cell Res. 2008 Jan;18(1):134-47. Review.

19.
20.

Role of the double-strand break repair pathway in the maintenance of genomic stability.

Le Guen T, Ragu S, Guirouilh-Barbat J, Lopez BS.

Mol Cell Oncol. 2014 Oct 30;2(1):e968020. doi: 10.4161/23723548.2014.968020. Review.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center