Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 26

1.
3.

Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology.

Schnatz PF, Guile M, O'Sullivan DM, Sorosky JI.

Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;107(3):701-8. Review.

PMID:
16507944
4.

Management of cervical premalignant lesions.

Lindeque BG.

Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Aug;19(4):545-61. Epub 2005 Mar 26. Review.

PMID:
16150393
5.

The 2001 Bethesda System terminology.

Apgar BS, Zoschnick L, Wright TC Jr.

Am Fam Physician. 2003 Nov 15;68(10):1992-8. Review.

6.

Pap test results. Responding to Bethesda system reports.

Colgan TJ.

Can Fam Physician. 2001 Jul;47:1425-30. Review.

7.

The Bethesda system and evaluation of abnormal pap smears.

Nguyen HN, Nordqvist SR.

Semin Surg Oncol. 1999 Apr-May;16(3):217-21. Review.

PMID:
10225298
8.

Can glandular lesions be diagnosed in pap smear cytology?

Raab SS.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2000 Aug;23(2):127-33. Review.

PMID:
10888760
9.

Liquid-based cervical cytology.

Klinkhamer PJ, Meerding WJ, Rosier PF, Hanselaar AG.

Cancer. 2003 Oct 25;99(5):263-71. Review.

10.

Prospective and retrospective review of gynecologic cytopathology: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 2.

Brainard JA, Birdsong GG, Elsheikh TM, Hartley DA, Naik K, Neal MH, Souers RJ, Henry MR.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Feb;137(2):175-82. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0178-OA. Review.

PMID:
23368859
11.

Living with uncertainty: equivocal Pap test results and the evolution of ASC terminology.

Howell LP, Wilton M, Bishop J, Afify A.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2010 Mar;38(3):221-32. doi: 10.1002/dc.21191. Review.

PMID:
19856423
12.

Atypical glandular cells: new Bethesda Terminology and Management Guidelines.

Levine L, Lucci JA 3rd, Dinh TV.

Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003 Jun;58(6):399-406. Review.

PMID:
12775944
13.

Image cytometry and chemoprevention in cervical cancer.

Palcic B, Garner DM, MacAulay CE.

J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1995;23:43-54. Review.

PMID:
8747377
14.

The Bethesda system for the reporting of cervical/vaginal cytology.

Oren A, Fernandes J.

J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1991 May;91(5):476-9. Review.

PMID:
2061103
15.

ASCUS in Papanicolaou smears. Problems, controversies, and potential future directions.

McGrath CM.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2002 Jun;117 Suppl:S62-75. Review.

PMID:
14569803
16.

Cervical cytology classification and the Bethesda System.

Davey DD.

Cancer J. 2003 Sep-Oct;9(5):327-34. Review.

PMID:
14690307
17.

When your patient asks: "Doctor, I read there have been serious Pap smear errors. Shouldn't I get one of those new computer Pap smears?".

Boronow RC, Cavett JR 3rd.

J Miss State Med Assoc. 1998 Apr;39(4):136-41. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
9585689
18.

Abnormal cervical cytology: new names, familiar smears.

Carulli DT.

J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2003 Oct;15(10):444-9. Review.

PMID:
14606133
19.

Predicting screening sensitivity from workload in gynecologic cytology: a review.

Renshaw AA, Elsheikh TM.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2011 Nov;39(11):832-6. doi: 10.1002/dc.21541. Epub 2010 Nov 22. Review.

PMID:
21994194
20.

The Pap Test and Bethesda 2014. "The reports of my demise have been greatly exaggerated." (after a quotation from Mark Twain).

Nayar R, Wilbur DC.

Acta Cytol. 2015;59(2):121-32. doi: 10.1159/000381842. Epub 2015 May 19. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center