Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 20

1.

Assessing the quality of research.

Glasziou P, Vandenbroucke JP, Chalmers I.

BMJ. 2004 Jan 3;328(7430):39-41. Review. No abstract available. Erratum in: BMJ. 2004 Sep 11;329(7466):621.

2.

The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.

Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JS, Zhang C, Li S, Sun F, Niu Y, Du L.

J Evid Based Med. 2015 Feb;8(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12141. Review.

3.

Challenges in systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine topics.

Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Suttorp MJ, Buscemi N, Friesen C; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1042-7. Review.

PMID:
15968028
4.

Uptake of methods to deal with publication bias in systematic reviews has increased over time, but there is still much scope for improvement.

Parekh-Bhurke S, Kwok CS, Pang C, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder JJ, Sutton AJ, Hing CB, Harvey I, Song F.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):349-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.022. Review.

PMID:
20800992
5.

Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?

Pound P, Ebrahim S, Sandercock P, Bracken MB, Roberts I; Reviewing Animal Trials Systematically (RATS) Group.

BMJ. 2004 Feb 28;328(7438):514-7. Review. No abstract available.

6.
7.

Critical appraisal for emergency medicine: 1. Concepts and definitions.

Goodacre S.

Emerg Med J. 2008 Apr;25(4):219-21. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.057307. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
18356354
8.

Evidence-based treatment of haemophilia.

Bolton-Maggs PH, Stobart K, Smyth RL.

Haemophilia. 2004 Oct;10 Suppl 4:20-4. Review.

PMID:
15479367
9.

[Methods of evidence mapping. A systematic review].

Schmucker C, Motschall E, Antes G, Meerpohl JJ.

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013 Oct;56(10):1390-7. doi: 10.1007/s00103-013-1818-y. Review. German.

PMID:
23978984
10.

Evidence-based burn care--An assessment of the methodological quality of research published in burn care journals from 1982 to 2008.

Al-Benna S, Alzoubaidi D, Al-Ajam Y.

Burns. 2010 Dec;36(8):1190-5. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.03.011. Epub 2010 Jun 19. Review.

PMID:
20621705
11.

Moving from evidence to developing recommendations in guidelines: article 11 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.

Sch√ľnemann HJ, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Brozek JL, Montori VM, Heffner J, Hill S, Woodhead M, Campos-Outcalt D, Alderson P, Woitalla T, Puhan MA, Falck-Ytter Y, Bousquet J, Guyatt G; ATS/ERS Ad Hoc Committee on Integrating and Coordinating Efforts in COPD Guideline Development.

Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):282-92. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-064ST. Review.

PMID:
23256172
12.

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.

Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, Hing C, Kwok CS, Pang C, Harvey I.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta14080. Review.

13.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Anderson WG, McNamara MC, Arnold RM.

J Palliat Med. 2009 Oct;12(10):937-46. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.9954. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
19807239
14.

The evolving science of translating research evidence into clinical practice.

Scott I.

Evid Based Med. 2007 Feb;12(1):4-7. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
17264256
15.

Methodological challenges in meditation research.

Caspi O, Burleson KO.

Adv Mind Body Med. 2007 Winter;22(3-4):36-43. Review.

PMID:
20664132
16.

Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 4. Assessing heterogeneity of primary studies in systematic reviews and whether to combine their results.

Hatala R, Keitz S, Wyer P, Guyatt G; Evidence-Based Medicine Teaching Tips Working Group.

CMAJ. 2005 Mar 1;172(5):661-5. Review. No abstract available.

17.

Identifying and avoiding bias in research.

Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Aug;126(2):619-25. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc. Review.

18.

Designing and reporting case series in plastic surgery.

Coroneos CJ, Ignacy TA, Thoma A.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Oct;128(4):361e-368e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318221f2ec. Review.

PMID:
21544010
19.

[When is enough evidence available?; interim analyses in clinical trials].

van der Tweel Iv, Roes KC.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(12):A5660. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
23515039
20.

Evidence-based medicine and the peer review process: complementary or at odds?

Fisher CG, Vaccaro AR.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jan 1;37(1):E1-2. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823dcce2. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
22179321

Supplemental Content

Support Center