Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 29

1.

TPR proteins: the versatile helix.

D'Andrea LD, Regan L.

Trends Biochem Sci. 2003 Dec;28(12):655-62. Review.

PMID:
14659697
2.

The tetratricopeptide repeat: a structural motif mediating protein-protein interactions.

Blatch GL, Lässle M.

Bioessays. 1999 Nov;21(11):932-9. Review.

PMID:
10517866
3.

Versatile TPR domains accommodate different modes of target protein recognition and function.

Allan RK, Ratajczak T.

Cell Stress Chaperones. 2011 Jul;16(4):353-67. doi: 10.1007/s12192-010-0248-0. Epub 2010 Dec 9. Review.

4.

Novel sequences propel familiar folds.

Jawad Z, Paoli M.

Structure. 2002 Apr;10(4):447-54. Review.

5.

Structural and functional discussion of the tetra-trico-peptide repeat, a protein interaction module.

Zeytuni N, Zarivach R.

Structure. 2012 Mar 7;20(3):397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.01.006. Review.

6.

Review: proteins with repeated sequence--structural prediction and modeling.

Kajava AV.

J Struct Biol. 2001 May-Jun;134(2-3):132-44. Review.

PMID:
11551175
7.

Protein repeats: structures, functions, and evolution.

Andrade MA, Perez-Iratxeta C, Ponting CP.

J Struct Biol. 2001 May-Jun;134(2-3):117-31. Review.

PMID:
11551174
8.

Templates in protein de novo design.

Tuchscherer G, Mutter M.

J Biotechnol. 1995 Jul 31;41(2-3):197-210. Review.

PMID:
7654350
9.

Protein fold irregularities that hinder sequence analysis.

Russell RB, Ponting CP.

Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1998 Jun;8(3):364-71. Review.

PMID:
9666333
10.

Repeat proteins challenge the concept of structural domains.

Espada R, Parra RG, Sippl MJ, Mora T, Walczak AM, Ferreiro DU.

Biochem Soc Trans. 2015 Oct;43(5):844-9. doi: 10.1042/BST20150083. Review.

PMID:
26517892
11.

When protein folding is simplified to protein coiling: the continuum of solenoid protein structures.

Kobe B, Kajava AV.

Trends Biochem Sci. 2000 Oct;25(10):509-15. Review.

PMID:
11050437
12.

Tetratrico peptide repeat interactions: to TPR or not to TPR?

Lamb JR, Tugendreich S, Hieter P.

Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Jul;20(7):257-9. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
7667876
13.

Modular peptide binding: from a comparison of natural binders to designed armadillo repeat proteins.

Reichen C, Hansen S, Plückthun A.

J Struct Biol. 2014 Feb;185(2):147-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Aug 3. Review.

PMID:
23916513
14.

Dissecting and reprogramming the folding and assembly of tandem-repeat proteins.

Rowling PJ, Sivertsson EM, Perez-Riba A, Main ER, Itzhaki LS.

Biochem Soc Trans. 2015 Oct;43(5):881-8. doi: 10.1042/BST20150099. Review.

PMID:
26517898
15.

Modeling repetitive, non-globular proteins.

Basu K, Campbell RL, Guo S, Sun T, Davies PL.

Protein Sci. 2016 May;25(5):946-58. doi: 10.1002/pro.2907. Epub 2016 Mar 16. Review.

16.

Tandem-repeat proteins: regularity plus modularity equals design-ability.

Javadi Y, Itzhaki LS.

Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2013 Aug;23(4):622-31. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Jul 4. Review.

PMID:
23831287
17.

The tandem β-zipper: modular binding of tandem domains and linear motifs.

Matthews JM, Potts JR.

FEBS Lett. 2013 Apr 17;587(8):1164-71. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Jan 16. Review.

18.

Strategy for studying modular proteins: application to complement modules.

Barlow PN, Campbell ID.

Methods Enzymol. 1994;239:464-85. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
7830595
19.

P58IPK, a novel cochaperone containing tetratricopeptide repeats and a J-domain with oncogenic potential.

Melville MW, Katze MG, Tan SL.

Cell Mol Life Sci. 2000 Feb;57(2):311-22. Review.

PMID:
10766025
20.

Structure and function of WD40 domain proteins.

Xu C, Min J.

Protein Cell. 2011 Mar;2(3):202-14. doi: 10.1007/s13238-011-1018-1. Epub 2011 Apr 6. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center