Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 24

1.

Quality improvement and the need for IRB review.

Nerenz DR, Stoltz PK, Jordan J.

Qual Manag Health Care. 2003 Jul-Sep;12(3):159-70.

PMID:
12891960
2.

Maximizing benefits and minimizing risks in health services research near the end of life.

Daly BJ, Rosenfeld K.

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Apr;25(4):S33-42. Review.

PMID:
12691695
3.

Research ethics and law of healthcare system quality improvement: the conflict of cost containment and quality.

Kofke WA, Rie MA.

Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3 Suppl):S143-52. Review.

PMID:
12626960
4.

The ethics of using QI methods to improve health care quality and safety.

Baily MA, Bottrell M, Lynn J, Jennings B, Hastings Center.

Hastings Cent Rep. 2006 Jul-Aug;36(4):S1-40. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
16898359
5.

What can we learn from quality improvement research? A critical review of research methods.

Alexander JA, Hearld LR.

Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Jun;66(3):235-71. doi: 10.1177/1077558708330424. Epub 2009 Jan 28. Review.

PMID:
19176833
6.

Working with the institutional review board.

Byerly WG.

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Jan 15;66(2):176-84. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070066. Review.

PMID:
19139484
7.
8.

The science of quality improvement implementation: developing capacity to make a difference.

Alexander JA, Hearld LR.

Med Care. 2011 Dec;49 Suppl:S6-20. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181e1709c. Review.

PMID:
20829724
9.

Research and continuous improvement: the merging of two entities?

Morrison E, Mobley D, Farley B.

Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1996 Fall;41(3):359-72. Review.

PMID:
10159997
10.

Who reviews the projects of unaffiliated researchers for ethics? A case study from Alberta.

O'Beirne M, Stingl M, Hayward S.

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2007 Summer;16(3):346-55. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
17695629
11.

The purpose, composition, and function of an institutional review board: balancing priorities.

Enfield KB, Truwit JD.

Respir Care. 2008 Oct;53(10):1330-6. Review.

12.

Designing a sustainable national registry for stroke quality improvement.

Schwamm L, Reeves MJ, Frankel M.

Am J Prev Med. 2006 Dec;31(6 Suppl 2):S251-7. Epub 2006 Nov 7. Review.

PMID:
17178314
13.

Practical tips for working effectively with your institutional review board.

Schwenzer KJ.

Respir Care. 2008 Oct;53(10):1354-61. Review.

14.

How do IRB members make decisions? A review and research agenda.

Pritchard IA.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Jun;6(2):31-46. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.2.31. Review.

PMID:
21680975
15.
16.
17.

Computerized information management for institutional review boards.

Hood MN, Gugerty B, Levine R, Ho VB.

Comput Inform Nurs. 2005 Jul-Aug;23(4):190-8; quiz 199-200. Review.

PMID:
16027533
18.

Human subjects issues and IRB review in practice-based research.

Wolf LE, Walden JF, Lo B.

Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3 Suppl 1:S30-7. Review.

19.

Institutional review board training for community practices: advice from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality Practice-Based Research Network listserv.

Dolor RJ, Smith PC, Neale AV; Agency for Health Care Research and Quality Practice-Based Research Network.

J Am Board Fam Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;21(4):345-52. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.04.080088. Review.

PMID:
18612061
20.

The slippery slope: differentiating between quality improvement and research.

Newhouse RP, Pettit JC, Poe S, Rocco L.

J Nurs Adm. 2006 Apr;36(4):211-9. Review.

PMID:
16609344

Supplemental Content

Support Center