Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 50

1.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Particulate Matter Health Effects Research Centers Program: a midcourse report of status, progress, and plans.

Lippmann M, Frampton M, Schwartz J, Dockery D, Schlesinger R, Koutrakis P, Froines J, Nel A, Finkelstein J, Godleski J, Kaufman J, Koenig J, Larson T, Luchtel D, Liu LJ, Oberdorster G, Peters A, Sarnat J, Sioutas C, Suh H, Sullivan J, Utell M, Wichmann E, Zelikoff J.

Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Jun;111(8):1074-92. Review.

3.

Evidence of health impacts of sulfate-and nitrate-containing particles in ambient air.

Reiss R, Anderson EL, Cross CE, Hidy G, Hoel D, McClellan R, Moolgavkar S.

Inhal Toxicol. 2007 May;19(5):419-49. Review.

PMID:
17365047
4.

Semi-continuous speciation analyses for ambient air particulate matter: an urgent need for health effects studies.

Lippmann M.

J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;19(3):235-47. doi: 10.1038/jes.2008.65. Epub 2008 Oct 29. Review.

PMID:
18957993
5.

Critical considerations in evaluating scientific evidence of health effects of ambient ozone: a conference report.

McClellan RO, Frampton MW, Koutrakis P, McDonnell WF, Moolgavkar S, North DW, Smith AE, Smith RL, Utell MJ.

Inhal Toxicol. 2009 Sep;21 Suppl 2:1-36. doi: 10.1080/08958370903176735. Review.

PMID:
19731972
7.
8.

Airborne particulate matter and human health: toxicological assessment and importance of size and composition of particles for oxidative damage and carcinogenic mechanisms.

Valavanidis A, Fiotakis K, Vlachogianni T.

J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2008 Oct-Dec;26(4):339-62. doi: 10.1080/10590500802494538. Review.

PMID:
19034792
9.

Research on risk assessment and risk management: future directions.

Grant LD, Jarabek AM.

Toxicol Ind Health. 1990 Oct;6(5):217-33. Review.

PMID:
2274985
10.

U.S. EPA health assessment for diesel engine exhaust: a review.

Ris C.

Inhal Toxicol. 2007;19 Suppl 1:229-39. Review.

PMID:
17886071
11.
12.

What's wrong with the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM(2.5))?

Green LC, Crouch EA, Ames MR, Lash TL.

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002 Jun;35(3):327-37. Review.

PMID:
12202048
13.

Synopsis of the temporal variation of particulate matter composition and size.

Demerjian KL, Mohnen VA.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2008 Feb;58(2):216-33. Review.

PMID:
18318338
14.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's inhalation RfD methodology: risk assessment for air toxics.

Jarabek AM, Menache MG, Overton JH Jr, Dourson ML, Miller FJ.

Toxicol Ind Health. 1990 Oct;6(5):279-301. Review.

PMID:
1670284
15.
16.

Setting ambient air quality standards for particulate matter.

McClellan RO.

Toxicology. 2002 Dec 27;181-182:329-47. Review.

PMID:
12505334
17.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's risk assessment guidelines.

Jarabek AM, Farland WH.

Toxicol Ind Health. 1990 Oct;6(5):199-216. Review.

PMID:
2274984
18.

Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: a report of the U.S. EPA-sponsored workshop.

Kavlock RJ, Daston GP, DeRosa C, Fenner-Crisp P, Gray LE, Kaattari S, Lucier G, Luster M, Mac MJ, Maczka C, Miller R, Moore J, Rolland R, Scott G, Sheehan DM, Sinks T, Tilson HA.

Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Aug;104 Suppl 4:715-40. Review.

19.

Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect.

Pope CA 3rd, Dockery DW.

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2006 Jun;56(6):709-42. Review.

PMID:
16805397
20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center