Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 149

1.

Evidence for use of coronary stents. A hierarchical bayesian meta-analysis.

Brophy JM, Belisle P, Joseph L.

Ann Intern Med. 2003 May 20;138(10):777-86.

PMID:
12755549
2.

Coronary artery stents: a rapid systematic review and economic evaluation.

Hill R, Bagust A, Bakhai A, Dickson R, Dündar Y, Haycox A, Mujica Mota R, Reaney A, Roberts D, Williamson P, Walley T.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(35):iii-iv, 1-242. Review.

3.

Stenting versus surgical bypass grafting for coronary artery disease: systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Biondi-Zoccai GG, Abbate A, Agostoni P, Parisi Q, Turri M, Anselmi M, Vassanelli C, Zardini P, Biasucci LM.

Ital Heart J. 2003 Apr;4(4):271-80. Review.

PMID:
12784781
4.

Overview of systematic reviews on invasive treatment of stable coronary artery disease.

Kuukasjärvi P, Malmivaara A, Halinen M, Hartikainen J, Keto PE, Talvensaari T, Tierala I, Mäkelä M.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Spring;22(2):219-34. Review.

PMID:
16571198
5.
6.

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for people with stable angina or acute coronary syndromes.

Bakhai A, Hill RA, Dundar Y, Dickson R, Walley T.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;(1):CD004588. Review.

PMID:
15674954
7.

Clinical outcomes of dialysis patients after implantation of DES: meta analysis and systematic review of literature.

Athappan G, Ponniah T.

Minerva Cardioangiol. 2009 Jun;57(3):291-7. Review.

PMID:
19513010
8.

[Experience with primary coronary angioplasty in management of patients suffering from acute myocardial infarction].

Maslov LN, Krylov AL.

Angiol Sosud Khir. 2008;14(1):131-41. Review. Russian.

PMID:
19156043
10.

Does off-pump or minimally invasive coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with percutaneous coronary intervention? A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Bainbridge D, Cheng D, Martin J, Novick R; Evidence-based Peri-operative Clinical Outcomes Research (EPiCOR) Group.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Mar;133(3):623-31. Review.

11.

Provisional stenting strategies: systematic overview and implications for clinical decision-making.

Cantor WJ, Peterson ED, Popma JJ, Zidar JP, Sketch MH Jr, Tcheng JE, Ohman EM.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Oct;36(4):1142-51. Review.

12.

Coronary stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction.

Mehta RH, Bates ER.

Am Heart J. 1999 Apr;137(4 Pt 1):603-11. Review.

PMID:
10097221
13.

Primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: six-month follow up and analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials.

Grines C, Patel A, Zijlstra F, Weaver WD, Granger C, Simes RJ; PCAT Collaborators. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Am Heart J. 2003 Jan;145(1):47-57. Review.

PMID:
12514654
14.

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of immediate angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: systematic review and economic evaluation.

Hartwell D, Colquitt J, Loveman E, Clegg AJ, Brodin H, Waugh N, Royle P, Davidson P, Vale L, MacKenzie L.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 May;9(17):1-99, iii-iv. Review.

15.

Percutaneous transluminal rotational atherectomy for coronary artery disease.

Wasiak J, Law J, Watson P, Spinks A.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD003334. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003334.pub2. Review.

PMID:
23235596
16.

Coronary artery stents in the treatment of ischaemic heart disease: a rapid and systematic review.

Meads C, Cummins C, Jolly K, Stevens A, Burls A, Hyde C.

Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(23):1-153. Review.

17.
18.

Gender differences in the outcome of interventional cardiac procedures.

Presbitero P, Carcagnì A.

Ital Heart J. 2003 Aug;4(8):522-7. Review.

PMID:
14564977
19.

The invasive management of angina: issues for consumers and commissioners.

Gunnell D, Harvey I, Smith L.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Aug;49(4):335-43. Review.

20.

Direct coronary stenting compared with stenting after predilatation is feasible, safe, and more cost-effective in selected patients: evidence to date indicating similar late outcomes.

Ijsselmuiden AJ, Tangelder GJ, Cotton JM, Vaijifdar B, Kiemeneij F, Slagboom T, v d Wieken R, Serruys PW, Laarman GJ.

Int J Cardiovasc Intervent. 2003;5(3):143-50. Review.

PMID:
12959731

Supplemental Content

Support Center