Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 18

1.

Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions.

Le Masurier GC, Tudor-Locke C.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 May;35(5):867-71.

PMID:
12750599
2.

Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: convergent validity.

Tudor-Locke C, Williams JE, Reis JP, Pluto D.

Sports Med. 2002;32(12):795-808. Review.

PMID:
12238942
3.

How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health.

Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR Jr.

Sports Med. 2004;34(1):1-8. Review.

PMID:
14715035
4.

Measurement of physical activity in children with particular reference to the use of heart rate and pedometry.

Rowlands AV, Eston RG, Ingledew DK.

Sports Med. 1997 Oct;24(4):258-72. Review.

PMID:
9339494
5.

Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: construct validity.

Tudor-Locke C, Williams JE, Reis JP, Pluto D.

Sports Med. 2004;34(5):281-91. Review.

PMID:
15107007
6.

[Pedometers for monitoring and improvement of the level of physical activity].

ten Hacken NH, de Greef MH.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Jan 26;152(4):193-7. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
18320943
7.

Using cadence to study free-living ambulatory behaviour.

Tudor-Locke C, Rowe DA.

Sports Med. 2012 May 1;42(5):381-98. doi: 10.2165/11599170-000000000-00000. Review.

PMID:
22462794
8.

A systematic review of studies using pedometers to promote physical activity among youth.

Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Tudor-Locke C.

Prev Med. 2009 Apr;48(4):307-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.02.014. Epub 2009 Feb 26. Review.

PMID:
19249328
9.

Measuring activity levels of young people: the validity of pedometers.

McNamara E, Hudson Z, Taylor SJ.

Br Med Bull. 2010;95:121-37. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldq016. Epub 2010 Jun 18. Review.

PMID:
20562207
10.

Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate.

Freedson PS, Miller K.

Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000 Jun;71(2 Suppl):S21-9. Review.

PMID:
10925821
11.

Reduced walking speed and distance as harbingers of the approaching grim reaper.

Franklin BA, Brinks J, Sacks R, Trivax J, Friedman H.

Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jul 15;116(2):313-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.04.024. Epub 2015 Apr 18. Review.

PMID:
25972052
12.

Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults.

Tudor-Locke CE, Myers AM.

Sports Med. 2001 Feb;31(2):91-100. Review.

PMID:
11227981
13.

[Assessment of daily physical activity by pedometer].

Yoshitake Y.

Nihon Rinsho. 2000 Sep;58 Suppl:179-83. Review. Japanese. No abstract available.

PMID:
11085111
14.

Physical activity and energy expenditure measurements using accelerometers in older adults.

Garatachea N, Torres Luque G, González Gallego J.

Nutr Hosp. 2010 Mar-Apr;25(2):224-30. Review.

15.

Pedometry methods for assessing free-living adults.

Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR, Shipe MF, McClain JJ.

J Phys Act Health. 2011 Mar;8(3):445-53. Review.

PMID:
21487145
16.

Wearable systems for monitoring mobility-related activities in chronic disease: a systematic review.

Allet L, Knols RH, Shirato K, de Bruin ED.

Sensors (Basel). 2010;10(10):9026-52. doi: 10.3390/s101009026. Epub 2010 Oct 8. Review.

17.

A Review of the Accuracy and Utility of Motion Sensors to Measure Physical Activity of Frail, Older Hospitalized Patients.

McCullagh R, Brady NM, Dillon C, Horgan NF, Timmons S.

J Aging Phys Act. 2016 Jul;24(3):465-75. doi: 10.1123/japa.2014-0190. Epub 2015 Nov 19. Review.

PMID:
26583827
18.

Walking speed: the functional vital sign.

Middleton A, Fritz SL, Lusardi M.

J Aging Phys Act. 2015 Apr;23(2):314-22. doi: 10.1123/japa.2013-0236. Epub 2014 May 2. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center