Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 28

2.

Randomised clinical trial, observational study and assessment of cost-effectiveness of the treatment of varicose veins (REACTIV trial).

Michaels JA, Campbell WB, Brazier JE, Macintyre JB, Palfreyman SJ, Ratcliffe J, Rigby K.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Apr;10(13):1-196, iii-iv. Review.

3.

Benefit, risks and cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Schmidt T, Mühlberger N, Chemelli-Steingruber IE, Strasak A, Kofler B, Chemelli A, Siebert U.

Rofo. 2010 Jul;182(7):573-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245140. Review.

PMID:
20563953
4.

The cost-effectiveness of screening for oral cancer in primary care.

Speight PM, Palmer S, Moles DR, Downer MC, Smith DH, Henriksson M, Augustovski F.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Apr;10(14):1-144, iii-iv. Review.

5.

What is the role of screening in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms?

Dabare D, Lo TT, McCormack DJ, Kung VW.

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Apr;14(4):399-405. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivr106. Review.

6.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Lindholt JS.

Dan Med Bull. 2010 Dec;57(12):B4219. Review.

PMID:
21122465
7.

A review of the evidence on the effects and costs of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in different patient groups, and modelling of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility for these groups in a UK context.

Buxton M, Caine N, Chase D, Connelly D, Grace A, Jackson C, Parkes J, Sharples L.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(27):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-164. Review.

8.

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Garside R, Pitt M, Anderson R, Rogers G, Dyer M, Mealing S, Somerville M, Price A, Stein K.

Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. Review.

9.

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Cosford PA, Leng GC.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD002945. Review.

PMID:
17443519
10.

Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: an updated rapid and systematic review and economic analysis.

Karnon J, Peters J, Platt J, Chilcott J, McGoogan E, Brewer N.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 May;8(20):iii, 1-78. Review.

11.

[Ultrasoud screening in abdominal aortic aneurysm--numbers, data, facts].

Hyhlik-Dürr A, Debus S, Eckstein HH, Lang W, Schmitz-Rixen T, Böckler D.

Zentralbl Chir. 2010 Oct;135(5):403-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247432. Review. German. Erratum in: Zentralbl Chir. 2011 Aug;136(4):390. Boeckler, D [corrected to Böckler, D].

PMID:
20976643
12.

Acupuncture of chronic headache disorders in primary care: randomised controlled trial and economic analysis.

Vickers AJ, Rees RW, Zollman CE, McCarney R, Smith CM, Ellis N, Fisher P, Van Haselen R, Wonderling D, Grieve R.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Nov;8(48):iii, 1-35. Review.

13.

Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Ballard DJ, Fowkes FG, Powell JT.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001835. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(4):CD001835.

PMID:
10796668
14.

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Canada: review and position statement of the Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery.

Mastracci TM, Cinà CS; Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery..

J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jun;45(6):1268-1276. Review. No abstract available.

15.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of height-screening programmes during the primary school years: a systematic review.

Fayter D, Nixon J, Hartley S, Rithalia A, Butler G, Rudolf M, Glasziou P, Bland M, Stirk L, Westwood M.

Arch Dis Child. 2008 Apr;93(4):278-84. Review.

PMID:
17475693
16.

Triumphs and tribulations in a new national screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Earnshaw JJ.

Acta Chir Belg. 2012 Mar-Apr;112(2):108-10. Review.

PMID:
22571071
17.

Population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: evaluating the evidence against screening criteria.

Nair N, Sarfati D, Shaw C.

N Z Med J. 2012 Feb 24;125(1350):72-83. Review.

PMID:
22382259
18.

[Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms has a positive clinical effect].

Lindholt JS, Green A, Søgaard R.

Ugeskr Laeger. 2013 Sep 16;175(38):2170-4. Review. Danish.

PMID:
24044536
19.

Update on screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a topical review.

Svensjö S, Björck M, Wanhainen A.

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;48(6):659-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.08.029. Review.

20.

[Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm; effectivity and cost-effectiveness].

van Gils PF, de Wit GA, Schuit AJ, van den Berg M.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153:B383. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
19857301
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center