Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 25

1.

Meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery. A systematic review of their methodologies.

Bhandari M, Morrow F, Kulkarni AV, Tornetta P 3rd.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Jan;83-A(1):15-24. Review.

PMID:
11205853
2.

Twenty years of meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery: has quality kept up with quantity?

Dijkman BG, Abouali JA, Kooistra BW, Conter HJ, Poolman RW, Kulkarni AV, Tornetta P 3rd, Bhandari M.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jan;92(1):48-57. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00251. Review.

PMID:
20048095
3.

[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].

Amato L, Colais P, Davoli M, Ferroni E, Fusco D, Minozzi S, Moirano F, Sciattella P, Vecchi S, Ventura M, Perucci CA.

Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. Review. Italian.

4.

Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: a systematic qualitative review of their methodology.

Jadad AR, McQuay HJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Feb;49(2):235-43. Review.

PMID:
8606325
5.

Strategies to improve the credibility of meta-analyses in spine surgery: a systematic survey.

Evaniew N, van der Watt L, Bhandari M, Ghert M, Aleem I, Drew B, Guyatt G.

Spine J. 2015 Sep 1;15(9):2066-76. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.05.018. Epub 2015 May 19. Review.

PMID:
26002725
6.

Evaluation of meta-analyses in the otolaryngological literature.

Rudmik LR, Walen SG, Dixon E, Dort J.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Aug;139(2):187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.03.020. Review.

PMID:
18656713
7.

Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions.

Hopewell S, McDonald S, Clarke M, Egger M.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):MR000010. Review.

PMID:
17443631
8.

Are meta-analyses of Chinese herbal medicine trials trustworthy and clinically applicable? A cross-sectional study.

Chung VC, Ho RS, Wu X, Fung DH, Lai X, Wu JC, Wong SY.

J Ethnopharmacol. 2015 Mar 13;162:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2014.12.028. Epub 2014 Dec 29. Review.

PMID:
25554640
9.

A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature.

Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, Manns B, Laupland KB, Doig CJ.

Crit Care. 2005 Oct 5;9(5):R575-82. Epub 2005 Sep 9. Review.

10.

Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature.

Klimo P Jr, Thompson CJ, Ragel BT, Boop FA.

J Neurosurg. 2014 Apr;120(4):796-810. doi: 10.3171/2013.11.JNS13195. Epub 2014 Jan 24. Review.

PMID:
24460488
11.

Aspirin for prophylactic use in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: a systematic review and overview of reviews.

Sutcliffe P, Connock M, Gurung T, Freeman K, Johnson S, Kandala NB, Grove A, Gurung B, Morrow S, Clarke A.

Health Technol Assess. 2013 Sep;17(43):1-253. doi: 10.3310/hta17430. Review.

12.

Cochrane Review: Osmotic and stimulant laxatives for the management of childhood constipation (Review).

Gordon M, Naidoo K, Akobeng AK, Thomas AG.

Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Jan;8(1):57-109. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1893. Review.

PMID:
23878124
13.

An assessment of the methodological quality of published network meta-analyses: a systematic review.

Chambers JD, Naci H, Wouters OJ, Pyo J, Gunjal S, Kennedy IR, Hoey MG, Winn A, Neumann PJ.

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 29;10(4):e0121715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121715. eCollection 2015. Review. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0131953.

14.

A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.

Forbes C, Shirran L, Bagnall AM, Duffy S, ter Riet G.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. Review.

15.

Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.

Zhang J, Wang J, Han L, Zhang F, Cao J, Ma Y.

Nurs Outlook. 2015 Jul-Aug;63(4):446-455.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.11.020. Epub 2014 Dec 4. Review.

PMID:
26187084
16.

Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review.

Strech D, Soltmann B, Weikert B, Bauer M, Pfennig A.

J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;72(9):1214-21. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10r06166yel. Epub 2011 Jan 25. Review.

PMID:
21294992
17.

A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in endodontics.

Suebnukarn S, Ngamboonsirisingh S, Rattanabanlang A.

J Endod. 2010 Apr;36(4):602-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.019. Epub 2010 Feb 21. Review.

PMID:
20307731
18.

Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.

Finckh A, Tramèr MR.

Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008 Mar;4(3):146-52. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0732. Review.

PMID:
18227829
19.

Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.

Ford AC, Guyatt GH, Talley NJ, Moayyedi P.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;105(2):280-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.658. Epub 2009 Nov 17. Review.

PMID:
19920807
20.

Inflammatory bowel disease meta-evidence and its challenges: is it time to restructure surgical research?

Delaney J, Laws P, Wille-Jørgensen P, Engel A.

Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jul;17(7):600-11. doi: 10.1111/codi.12882. Review.

PMID:
25546572

Supplemental Content

Support Center