Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 23

2.

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting for coronary artery disease?

Währborg P.

Scand Cardiovasc J. 1997;31(4):201-11. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
9291538
3.

Landmarks in the development of coronary artery bypass surgery.

Favaloro RG.

Circulation. 1998 Aug 4;98(5):466-78. Review. No abstract available.

4.
5.

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for people with stable angina or acute coronary syndromes.

Bakhai A, Hill RA, Dundar Y, Dickson R, Walley T.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;(1):CD004588. Review.

PMID:
15674954
6.

Stenting versus surgical bypass grafting for coronary artery disease: systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Biondi-Zoccai GG, Abbate A, Agostoni P, Parisi Q, Turri M, Anselmi M, Vassanelli C, Zardini P, Biasucci LM.

Ital Heart J. 2003 Apr;4(4):271-80. Review.

PMID:
12784781
7.

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.

Anderson L, Thompson DR, Oldridge N, Zwisler AD, Rees K, Martin N, Taylor RS.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 5;(1):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub3. Review.

PMID:
26730878
8.

Coronary artery stents: a rapid systematic review and economic evaluation.

Hill R, Bagust A, Bakhai A, Dickson R, Dündar Y, Haycox A, Mujica Mota R, Reaney A, Roberts D, Williamson P, Walley T.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(35):iii-iv, 1-242. Review.

9.

Drug, devices, technologies, and techniques for blood management in minimally invasive and conventional cardiothoracic surgery: a consensus statement from the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2011.

Menkis AH, Martin J, Cheng DC, Fitzgerald DC, Freedman JJ, Gao C, Koster A, Mackenzie GS, Murphy GJ, Spiess B, Ad N.

Innovations (Phila). 2012 Jul-Aug;7(4):229-41. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e3182747699.

PMID:
23123988
10.
11.
12.

Changing efficacies of coronary revascularization.

Pryor DB.

Trans Assoc Life Insur Med Dir Am. 1991;74:97-110. Review.

PMID:
1853532
13.

Coronary artery revascularisation: selecting the appropriate strategy.

Adams MR.

Intern Med J. 2013 Jan;43(1):18-22. doi: 10.1111/imj.12020. Review.

PMID:
23324088
15.

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.

Deb S, Wijeysundera HC, Ko DT, Tsubota H, Hill S, Fremes SE.

JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718. Review.

PMID:
24240936
16.

Does off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery have a beneficial effect on long-term mortality and morbidity compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery?

Chaudhry UA, Rao C, Harling L, Athanasiou T.

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;19(1):149-59. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu075. Epub 2014 Mar 21. Review.

PMID:
24659552
17.

Worse long-term survival after off-pump than on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Takagi H, Umemoto T; All-Literature Investigation of Cardiovascular Evidence (ALICE) Group.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):1820-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.034. Epub 2014 May 21. Review.

18.

Coronary arterial revascularization: past, present, future: part I--historical trials.

Gupta A, Burke J, Bove A.

Clin Cardiol. 2006 Jul;29(7):290-4. Review.

19.

Ultrafast computed tomography in assessing coronary bypass grafts.

Stanford W, Krachmer M, Galvin JR.

Am J Card Imaging. 1991 Mar;5(1):21-8. Review.

PMID:
10147581
20.

Off pump coronary artery bypass: a passing fad or ready for prime time?

Briffa N.

Eur Heart J. 2008 Jun;29(11):1346-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn128. Epub 2008 Mar 16. Review.

PMID:
18346959

Supplemental Content

Support Center