Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 26

1.

A note on the statistical power in extended twin designs.

Posthuma D, Boomsma DI.

Behav Genet. 2000 Mar;30(2):147-58.

PMID:
10979605
2.

The mechanism of emergenesis.

Lykken DT.

Genes Brain Behav. 2006 Jun;5(4):306-10. Review.

3.

Classical twin design in modern pharmacogenomics studies.

Rahmio─člu N, Ahmadi KR.

Pharmacogenomics. 2010 Feb;11(2):215-26. doi: 10.2217/pgs.09.171. Review.

PMID:
20136360
4.

A twin-pronged attack on complex traits.

Martin N, Boomsma D, Machin G.

Nat Genet. 1997 Dec;17(4):387-92. Review.

PMID:
9398838
5.

Modeling extended twin family data I: description of the Cascade model.

Keller MC, Medland SE, Duncan LE, Hatemi PK, Neale MC, Maes HH, Eaves LJ.

Twin Res Hum Genet. 2009 Feb;12(1):8-18. doi: 10.1375/twin.12.1.8. Review.

6.

Genetics of suicide: a systematic review of twin studies.

Voracek M, Loibl LM.

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2007;119(15-16):463-75. Review.

PMID:
17721766
7.

Twins. Novel uses to study complex traits and genetic diseases.

MacGregor AJ, Snieder H, Schork NJ, Spector TD.

Trends Genet. 2000 Mar;16(3):131-4. Review.

PMID:
10689354
8.

Do etiological influences on aggression overlap with those on rule breaking? A meta-analysis.

Burt SA.

Psychol Med. 2013 Sep;43(9):1801-12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712001894. Review.

PMID:
22909442
9.

Genetic and environmental influences on human dental variation: a critical evaluation of studies involving twins.

Townsend G, Hughes T, Luciano M, Bockmann M, Brook A.

Arch Oral Biol. 2009 Dec;54 Suppl 1:S45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.06.009. Review.

10.

Twins in cardiovascular genetic research.

Luft FC.

Hypertension. 2001 Feb;37(2 Pt 2):350-6. Review.

11.

The equal environments assumption of classical twin studies may not hold.

Richardson K, Norgate S.

Br J Educ Psychol. 2005 Sep;75(Pt 3):339-50. Review.

PMID:
16238870
12.

Estimation and partition of heritability in human populations using whole-genome analysis methods.

Vinkhuyzen AA, Wray NR, Yang J, Goddard ME, Visscher PM.

Annu Rev Genet. 2013;47:75-95. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133258. Review.

13.

Twins for epigenetic studies of human aging and development.

Tan Q, Christiansen L, Thomassen M, Kruse TA, Christensen K.

Ageing Res Rev. 2013 Jan;12(1):182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2012.06.004. Review.

14.

A twin approach to unraveling epigenetics.

Bell JT, Spector TD.

Trends Genet. 2011 Mar;27(3):116-25. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.12.005. Review.

15.

Genetic and environmental impacts on DNA methylation levels in twins.

Yet I, Tsai PC, Castillo-Fernandez JE, Carnero-Montoro E, Bell JT.

Epigenomics. 2016 Jan;8(1):105-17. doi: 10.2217/epi.15.90. Review.

PMID:
26678685
16.

Twin methodology in epigenetic studies.

Tan Q, Christiansen L, von Bornemann Hjelmborg J, Christensen K.

J Exp Biol. 2015 Jan 1;218(Pt 1):134-9. doi: 10.1242/jeb.107151. Review.

17.

Twin, association and current "omics" studies.

Boomsma DI.

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Oct;26 Suppl 2:9-12. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.830405. Review.

PMID:
24059544
18.

Genomics of ageing in twins.

Mangino M.

Proc Nutr Soc. 2014 Nov;73(4):526-31. doi: 10.1017/S0029665114000640. Review.

PMID:
24984159
19.

Twins and endocrinology.

Hari Kumar KV, Modi KD.

Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Nov;18(Suppl 1):S48-52. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.145074. Review.

20.

Explaining additional genetic variation in complex traits.

Robinson MR, Wray NR, Visscher PM.

Trends Genet. 2014 Apr;30(4):124-32. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.02.003. Review.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center