Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 64

1.

Long-term clinical outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Registry: comparison with the randomized trial. BARI Investigators.

Feit F, Brooks MM, Sopko G, Keller NM, Rosen A, Krone R, Berger PB, Shemin R, Attubato MJ, Williams DO, Frye R, Detre KM.

Circulation. 2000 Jun 20;101(24):2795-802.

2.

[Comparison between PTCA and bypass operation. Results of large randomized studies].

Dagres N, Erbel R.

Med Klin (Munich). 1998 Jan 15;93(1):22-6, 58. Review. German.

PMID:
9505075
3.

Coronary artery stents: a rapid systematic review and economic evaluation.

Hill R, Bagust A, Bakhai A, Dickson R, Dündar Y, Haycox A, Mujica Mota R, Reaney A, Roberts D, Williamson P, Walley T.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(35):iii-iv, 1-242. Review.

4.

Clinical trials of revascularization therapy in diabetics.

Brooks RC, Detre KM.

Curr Opin Cardiol. 2000 Jul;15(4):287-92. Review.

PMID:
11139093
6.

Survival in patients with peripheral vascular disease after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

O'Rourke DJ, Quinton HB, Piper W, Hernandez F, Morton J, Hettleman B, Hearne M, Nugent W, O'Connor GT, Malenka DJ; Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group..

Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Aug;78(2):466-70; discussion 470. Review.

PMID:
15276497
8.

Stenting versus surgical bypass grafting for coronary artery disease: systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Biondi-Zoccai GG, Abbate A, Agostoni P, Parisi Q, Turri M, Anselmi M, Vassanelli C, Zardini P, Biasucci LM.

Ital Heart J. 2003 Apr;4(4):271-80. Review.

PMID:
12784781
9.
10.

Systematic review: the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Bravata DM, Gienger AL, McDonald KM, Sundaram V, Perez MV, Varghese R, Kapoor JR, Ardehali R, Owens DK, Hlatky MA.

Ann Intern Med. 2007 Nov 20;147(10):703-16. Epub 2007 Oct 15. Review.

PMID:
17938385
11.

Clinical trials of coronary revascularization: coronary angioplasty vs. coronary bypass grafting.

Bourassa MG.

Curr Opin Cardiol. 2000 Jul;15(4):281-6. Review.

PMID:
11139092
12.

Comparison of coronary revascularization procedures in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

McKellar SH, Brown ML, Frye RL, Schaff HV, Sundt TM 3rd.

Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008 Nov;5(11):738-46. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1348. Epub 2008 Sep 30. Review.

PMID:
18825133
13.

Coronary angioplasty versus bypass grafting. Cost-benefit considerations.

Sherman DL, Ryan TJ.

Med Clin North Am. 1995 Sep;79(5):1085-95. Review.

PMID:
7674686
14.

The invasive management of angina: issues for consumers and commissioners.

Gunnell D, Harvey I, Smith L.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Aug;49(4):335-43. Review.

15.

Has multivessel angioplasty displaced surgical revascularization?

King SB 3rd, Ivanhoe RJ.

Cardiovasc Clin. 1990;21(1):123-37; discussion 138-9. Review.

PMID:
2199044
16.

[Myocardial revascularization in geriatric patients].

Garachemani A, Kipfer B, Fleisch M, Kaufmann U, Lüscher TF, Althaus U, Meier B.

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1997 Mar 15;127(11):425-9. Review. German.

PMID:
9148396
17.

Coronary angioplasty and surgical revascularization: emerging concepts.

Philippides GJ, Jacobs AK.

Cardiology. 1995;86(4):324-38. Review.

PMID:
7553708
18.

[The recent trend of coronary surgery].

Hirata K, Ban T.

Rinsho Kyobu Geka. 1990 Feb;10(1):7-14. Review. Japanese.

PMID:
9423056
19.

[Cardiosurgical stand-by and acute interventions after interventional cardiologic procedures].

Oelert H.

Z Kardiol. 1996;85 Suppl 6:303-8. Review. German.

PMID:
9064979
20.

Clinical implications of the BARI 2D and COURAGE trials: the evolving role of percutaneous coronary intervention.

Holper EM, Addo T.

Coron Artery Dis. 2010 Nov;21(7):397-401. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32833d0134. Review.

PMID:
20634692

Supplemental Content

Support Center