Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 43

1.

Health care as a universal right.

Nunes R, Nunes SB, Rego G.

Z Gesundh Wiss. 2017;25(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s10389-016-0762-3. Epub 2016 Aug 9.

2.

Use of the 'Accountability for Reasonableness' Approach to Improve Fairness in Accessing Dialysis in a Middle-Income Country.

Moosa MR, Maree JD, Chirehwa MT, Benatar SR.

PLoS One. 2016 Oct 4;11(10):e0164201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164201. eCollection 2016. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12 ):e0168017.

3.

HTA - Algorithm or Process? Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy".

Culyer AJ.

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 May 16;5(8):501-505. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.59.

4.

Do ethical considerations influence any in HTA reports? A review of reports.

Shams Moattar A, Asghari F, Majdzadeh R.

Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 May 3;30:362. eCollection 2016.

5.

Balancing costs and benefits at different stages of medical innovation: a systematic review of Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).

Wahlster P, Goetghebeur M, Kriza C, Niederländer C, Kolominsky-Rabas P; National Leading-Edge Cluster Medical Technologies ‘Medical Valley EMN’..

BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 9;15:262. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0930-0. Review.

6.

Exploring the perspectives and preferences for HTA across German healthcare stakeholders using a multi-criteria assessment of a pulmonary heart sensor as a case study.

Wahlster P, Goetghebeur M, Schaller S, Kriza C, Kolominsky-Rabas P; National Leading-Edge Cluster Medical Technologies ‘Medical Valley EMN’..

Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Apr 28;13:24. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0011-1.

7.

Points to consider for prioritizing clinical genetic testing services: a European consensus process oriented at accountability for reasonableness.

Severin F, Borry P, Cornel MC, Daniels N, Fellmann F, Victoria Hodgson S, Howard HC, John J, Kääriäinen H, Kayserili H, Kent A, Koerber F, Kristoffersson U, Kroese M, Lewis C, Marckmann G, Meyer P, Pfeufer A, Schmidtke J, Skirton H, Tranebjærg L, Rogowski WH; EuroGentest and ESHG/PPPC Priority Consortium..

Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Jun;23(6):729-35. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.190. Epub 2014 Sep 24.

8.

The accountability for reasonableness approach to guide priority setting in health systems within limited resources--findings from action research at district level in Kenya, Tanzania, and Zambia.

Byskov J, Marchal B, Maluka S, Zulu JM, Bukachi SA, Hurtig AK, Blystad A, Kamuzora P, Michelo C, Nyandieka LN, Ndawi B, Bloch P, Olsen OE; REACT Consortium..

Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Aug 20;12:49. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-49.

9.

Funding decisions for newborn screening: a comparative review of 22 decision processes in Europe.

Fischer KE, Rogowski WH.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 May 19;11(5):5403-30. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110505403. Review.

10.

Setting healthcare priorities in hospitals: a review of empirical studies.

Barasa EW, Molyneux S, English M, Cleary S.

Health Policy Plan. 2015 Apr;30(3):386-96. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu010. Epub 2014 Mar 5. Review.

11.

Increased fairness in priority setting processes within the health sector: the case of Kapiri-Mposhi District, Zambia.

Zulu JM, Michelo C, Msoni C, Hurtig AK, Byskov J, Blystad A.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 18;14:75. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-75.

12.

Ethical considerations for the clinical oncologist in an era of oncology drug shortages.

Jagsi R, Spence R, Rathmell WK, Bradbury A, Peppercorn J, Grubbs S, Moy B.

Oncologist. 2014 Feb;19(2):186-92. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0301. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

13.

Criteria for fairly allocating scarce health-care resources to genetic tests: which matter most?

Rogowski WH, Grosse SD, Schmidtke J, Marckmann G.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Jan;22(1):25-31. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.172. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

15.

Priority setting in health care: a complementary approach.

Nunes R, Rego G.

Health Care Anal. 2014 Sep;22(3):292-303. doi: 10.1007/s10728-013-0243-6.

16.

Eliciting preferences for priority setting in genetic testing: a pilot study comparing best-worst scaling and discrete-choice experiments.

Severin F, Schmidtke J, Mühlbacher A, Rogowski WH.

Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Nov;21(11):1202-8. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.36. Epub 2013 Mar 13.

17.
18.

Institutionalizing telemedicine applications: the challenge of legitimizing decision-making.

Zanaboni P, Lettieri E.

J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 28;13(3):e72. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1669.

19.

Laypersons' choices and deliberations for mental health coverage.

Evans-Lacko SE, Baum N, Danis M, Biddle A, Goold S.

Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 May;39(3):158-69. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0341-4.

20.

Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania: a realist evaluation.

Maluka S, Kamuzora P, Sansebastián M, Byskov J, Ndawi B, Olsen ØE, Hurtig AK.

Implement Sci. 2011 Feb 10;6:11. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-11.

Supplemental Content

Support Center