Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 9

1.

Communicating scientific uncertainty.

Fischhoff B, Davis AL.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4:13664-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317504111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.

2.

More Is Not Always Better: Intuitions About Effective Public Policy Can Lead to Unintended Consequences.

Peters E, Klein W, Kaufman A, Meilleur L, Dixon A.

Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2013 Jan 1;7(1):114-148.

3.

A cyclic-RGD-BioShuttle functionalized with TMZ by DARinv "Click Chemistry" targeted to αvβ3 integrin for therapy.

Braun K, Wiessler M, Pipkorn R, Ehemann V, Bäuerle T, Fleischhacker H, Müller G, Lorenz P, Waldeck W.

Int J Med Sci. 2010 Sep 21;7(6):326-39.

4.

Factors associated with annual-interval mammography for women in their 40s.

Gierisch JM, O'Neill SC, Rimer BK, DeFrank JT, Bowling JM, Skinner CS.

Cancer Epidemiol. 2009 Jul;33(1):72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2009.03.001. Epub 2009 May 29.

5.

How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model.

Keen JD, Keen JE.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 Sep 21;8:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-40.

6.

Breast Cancer in Canadian Women.

Bryant H.

BMC Womens Health. 2004 Aug 25;4 Suppl 1:S12.

7.

A randomized trial of three videos that differ in the framing of information about mammography in women 40 to 49 years old.

Lewis CL, Pignone MP, Sheridan SL, Downs SM, Kinsinger LS.

J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Nov;18(11):875-83.

8.

US women's attitudes to false-positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross-sectional survey.

Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Sox HC, Fischhoff B, Welch HG.

West J Med. 2000 Nov;173(5):307-12.

9.

US women's attitudes to false positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross sectional survey.

Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Sox HC, Fischhoff B, Welch HG.

BMJ. 2000 Jun 17;320(7250):1635-40.

Supplemental Content

Support Center