Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 43

1.

Comparison of the association of mammographic density and clinical factors with ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal breast cancer in Korean women.

Ko H, Shin J, Lee JE, Nam SJ, Nguyen TL, Hopper JL, Song YM.

BMC Cancer. 2017 Dec 5;17(1):821. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3841-0.

2.

Breast density does not impact the ability of Videssa® Breast to detect breast cancer in women under age 50.

Reese DE, Henderson MC, Silver M, Mulpuri R, Letsios E, Tran Q, Wolf JK.

PLoS One. 2017 Oct 25;12(10):e0186198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186198. eCollection 2017.

3.

Predicting Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtype Using Multiple Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms for Breast Cancer Risk and Several Variable Selection Methods.

Häberle L, Hein A, Rübner M, Schneider M, Ekici AB, Gass P, Hartmann A, Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Lo WY, Schroth W, Brauch H, Fasching PA, Wunderle M.

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017 Jun;77(6):667-678. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-111602. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

4.

The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study.

Wanders JOP, Holland K, Karssemeijer N, Peeters PHM, Veldhuis WB, Mann RM, van Gils CH.

Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 5;19(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0859-9.

5.

Chemoprevention of Rat Mammary Carcinogenesis by Apiaceae Spices.

Aqil F, Jeyabalan J, Munagala R, Ravoori S, Vadhanam MV, Schultz DJ, Gupta RC.

Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Feb 16;18(2). pii: E425. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020425.

6.

From transformation to metastasis: deconstructing the extracellular matrix in breast cancer.

Kaushik S, Pickup MW, Weaver VM.

Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016 Dec;35(4):655-667. doi: 10.1007/s10555-016-9650-0.

7.

Mammographically dense human breast tissue stimulates MCF10DCIS.com progression to invasive lesions and metastasis.

Huo CW, Waltham M, Khoo C, Fox SB, Hill P, Chen S, Chew GL, Price JT, Nguyen CH, Williams ED, Henderson M, Thompson EW, Britt KL.

Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Oct 25;18(1):106.

8.

Automated quality assessment in three-dimensional breast ultrasound images.

Schwaab J, Diez Y, Oliver A, Martí R, van Zelst J, Gubern-Mérida A, Mourri AB, Gregori J, Günther M.

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016 Apr;3(2):027002. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.2.027002. Epub 2016 Apr 25.

9.

The Impact of Acquisition Dose on Quantitative Breast Density Estimation with Digital Mammography: Results from ACRIN PA 4006.

Chen L, Ray S, Keller BM, Pertuz S, McDonald ES, Conant EF, Kontos D.

Radiology. 2016 Sep;280(3):693-700. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016151749. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

10.

Risk factors and biomarkers of life-threatening cancers.

Autier P.

Ecancermedicalscience. 2015 Nov 24;9:596. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2015.596. eCollection 2015. Review.

11.

Postmenopausal mammographic breast density and subsequent breast cancer risk according to selected tissue markers.

Yaghjyan L, Pettersson A, Colditz GA, Collins LC, Schnitt SJ, Beck AH, Rosner B, Vachon C, Tamimi RM.

Br J Cancer. 2015 Sep 29;113(7):1104-13. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.315. Epub 2015 Sep 3.

12.

Hormone Therapy and its Effect on the Prognosis in Breast Cancer Patients.

Rauh C, Schuetz F, Rack B, Stickeler E, Klar M, Orlowska-Volk M, Windfuhr-Blum M, Heil J, Rom J, Sohn C, Andergassen U, Jueckstock J, Fehm T, Loehberg CR, Hein A, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hartmann A, Beckmann MW, Janni W, Fasching PA, Häberle L.

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015 Jun;75(6):588-596.

13.

Mammographic density and breast cancer in women from high risk families.

Ramón Y Cajal T, Chirivella I, Miranda J, Teule A, Izquierdo Á, Balmaña J, Sánchez-Heras AB, Llort G, Fisas D, Lope V, Hernández-Agudo E, Juan-Fita MJ, Tena I, Robles L, Guillén-Ponce C, Pérez-Segura P, Luque-Molina MS, Hernando-Polo S, Salinas M, Brunet J, Salas-Trejo MD, Barnadas A, Pollán M.

Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Jul 11;17:93. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0604-1.

14.

High mammographic density is associated with an increase in stromal collagen and immune cells within the mammary epithelium.

Huo CW, Chew G, Hill P, Huang D, Ingman W, Hodson L, Brown KA, Magenau A, Allam AH, McGhee E, Timpson P, Henderson MA, Thompson EW, Britt K.

Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Jun 4;17:79. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0592-1.

15.

Effects of statin use on volumetric mammographic density: results from the KARMA study.

Skarping I, Brand JS, Hall P, Borgquist S.

BMC Cancer. 2015 May 28;15:435. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1457-9.

16.

Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study.

Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Tosteson AN, Sprague BL, Tice JA, Lehman CD, Miglioretti DL; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 19;162(10):673-81. doi: 10.7326/M14-1465.

17.

Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk: interactions of percent density, absolute dense, and non-dense areas with breast cancer risk factors.

Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Tamimi RM.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Feb;150(1):181-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3286-6. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

18.

Emerging Concepts in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.

Gierach GL, Yang XR, Figueroa JD, Sherman ME.

Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2013 Mar;2(1):43-52.

19.

Mammographic Density and Prediction of Nodal Status in Breast Cancer Patients.

Hack CC, Häberle L, Geisler K, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hartmann A, Fasching PA, Uder M, Wachter DL, Jud SM, Loehberg CR, Lux MP, Rauh C, Beckmann MW, Heusinger K.

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013 Feb;73(2):136-141.

20.

Tumor phenotype and breast density in distinct categories of interval cancer: results of population-based mammography screening in Spain.

Domingo L, Salas D, Zubizarreta R, Baré M, Sarriugarte G, Barata T, Ibáñez J, Blanch J, Puig-Vives M, Fernández A, Castells X, Sala M; INCA Study Group.

Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Jan 10;16(1):R3. doi: 10.1186/bcr3595.

Supplemental Content

Support Center