Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 25

1.

Perioperative surgical outcome of conventional and robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

van Weelden WJ, Gordon BBM, Roovers EA, Kraayenbrink AA, Aalders CIM, Hartog F, Dijkhuizen FPHLJ.

Gynecol Surg. 2017;14(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s10397-017-1008-2. Epub 2017 Apr 25.

2.

Randomized controlled trial comparing operative times between standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Deimling TA, Eldridge JL, Riley KA, Kunselman AR, Harkins GJ.

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jan;136(1):64-69. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12001. Epub 2016 Nov 3.

PMID:
28099699
3.

Indications and Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/070, April 2015)

Neis KJ, Zubke W, Römer T, Schwerdtfeger K, Schollmeyer T, Rimbach S, Holthaus B, Solomayer E, Bojahr B, Neis F, Reisenauer C, Gabriel B, Dieterich H, Runnenbaum IB, Kleine W, Strauss A, Menton M, Mylonas I, David M, Horn LC, Schmidt D, Gaß P, Teichmann AT, Brandner P, Stummvoll W, Kuhn A, Müller M, Fehr M, Tamussino K.

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016 Apr;76(4):350-364.

4.

Application of da Vinci(®) Robot in simple or radical hysterectomy: Tips and tricks.

Iavazzo C, Gkegkes ID.

J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2016 Jan 12;17(2):106-9. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2015.0156. eCollection 2016. Review.

5.

Three-dimensional laparoscopy: Principles and practice.

Sinha RY, Raje SR, Rao GA.

J Minim Access Surg. 2017 Jul-Sep;13(3):165-169. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.181761. Review.

6.

Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Morcellation Compared With Abdominal Hysterectomy for Presumed Myomas.

Rutstein SE, Siedhoff MT, Geller EJ, Doll KM, Wu JM, Clarke-Pearson DL, Wheeler SB.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Feb 1;23(2):223-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.09.025. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

7.

Robotically assisted gynecologic surgery: 2-year experience in the French foch hospital.

Goetgheluck J, Carbonnel M, Ayoubi JM.

Front Surg. 2014 May 5;1:8. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2014.00008. eCollection 2014.

8.

Cost analysis when open surgeons perform minimally invasive hysterectomy.

Shepherd JP, Kantartzis KL, Ahn KH, Bonidie MJ, Lee T.

JSLS. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4). pii: e2014.00181. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00181. Erratum in: JSLS. 2015 Jan-Mar;19(1):e2015.00027.

9.

Strategies to optimize the performance of Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Lambrou N, Diaz RE, Hinoul P, Parris D, Shoemaker K, Yoo A, Schwiers M.

Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2014;6(3):133-42.

10.

The impact of different surgical modalities for hysterectomy on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes.

Pitter MC, Simmonds C, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hubert HB.

Interact J Med Res. 2014 Jul 17;3(3):e11. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.3160.

11.

Novel port placement and 5-mm instrumentation for robotic-assisted hysterectomy.

Nezhat CH, Katz A, Dun EC, Kho KA, Wieser FA.

JSLS. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):167-73. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422518399.

12.

A financial analysis of operating room charges for robot-assisted gynaecologic surgery: Efficiency strategies in the operating room for reducing the costs.

Zeybek B, Oge T, Kılıç CH, Borahay MA, Kılıç GS.

J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2014 Mar 1;15(1):25-9. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.jtgga.2014.79989. eCollection 2014.

13.

An economic analysis of robotically assisted hysterectomy.

Wright JD, Ananth CV, Tergas AI, Herzog TJ, Burke WM, Lewin SN, Lu YS, Neugut AI, Hershman DL.

Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May;123(5):1038-48. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000244.

14.

Uterine fibroids and current clinical challenges.

Salama SS, Kılıç GS.

J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2013 Mar 1;14(1):40-5. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2013.09. eCollection 2013. Review.

15.

Cost differences among robotic, vaginal, and abdominal hysterectomy.

Woelk JL, Borah BJ, Trabuco EC, Heien HC, Gebhart JB.

Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):255-62. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000090.

16.

Proceedings from the Third National Institutes of Health International Congress on Advances in Uterine Leiomyoma Research: comprehensive review, conference summary and future recommendations.

Segars JH, Parrott EC, Nagel JD, Guo XC, Gao X, Birnbaum LS, Pinn VW, Dixon D.

Hum Reprod Update. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):309-33. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt058. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

17.

Effect of a disposable automated suturing device on cost and operating room time in benign total laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures.

Hart S, Hashemi L, Sobolewski CJ.

JSLS. 2013 Oct-Dec;17(4):508-16. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422522231.

18.

Learning curve assessment of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open-surgery controls from the premier perspective database.

Davis JW, Kreaden US, Gabbert J, Thomas R.

J Endourol. 2014 May;28(5):560-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0534. Epub 2014 Feb 6.

19.

Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease.

Rosero EB, Kho KA, Joshi GP, Giesecke M, Schaffer JI.

Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):778-86. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a4ee4d.

20.

Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Prospective Study.

Carbonnel M, Abbou H, N'guyen HT, Roy S, Hamdi G, Jnifen A, Ayoubi JM.

Minim Invasive Surg. 2013;2013:429105. doi: 10.1155/2013/429105. Epub 2013 Jul 7.

Supplemental Content

Support Center