Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 30

1.

A PICTORIAL PRESENTATION OF ESOPHAGEAL HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY CURRENT PARAMETERS.

Lafraia FM, Herbella FAM, Kalluf JR, Patti MG.

Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2017 Jan-Mar;30(1):69-71. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720201700010019. English, Portuguese.

2.

Treatments for achalasia in 2017: how to choose among them.

Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE.

Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;33(4):270-276. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000365.

PMID:
28426463
3.

High-Resolution Manometry in Clinical Practice.

Carlson DA, Pandolfino JE.

Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2015 Jun;11(6):374-84.

4.

Esophageal contractions in type 3 achalasia esophagus: simultaneous or peristaltic?

Kim TH, Patel N, Ledgerwood-Lee M, Mittal RK.

Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016 May 1;310(9):G689-95. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00459.2015. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

5.

Relationship between esophageal clinical symptoms and manometry findings in patients with esophageal motility disorders: a cross-sectional study.

FakhreYaseri H, FakhreYaseri AM, Baradaran Moghaddam A, Soltani Arabshhi SK.

Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015 Oct 3;29:271. eCollection 2015.

6.

The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AJ, Pandolfino JE; International High Resolution Manometry Working Group.

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):160-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12477. Epub 2014 Dec 3.

7.

The Chicago classification of motility disorders: an update.

Roman S, Gyawali CP, Xiao Y, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ.

Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014 Oct;24(4):545-61. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Aug 1. Review.

8.

The four phases of esophageal bolus transit defined by high-resolution impedance manometry and fluoroscopy.

Lin Z, Yim B, Gawron A, Imam H, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE.

Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014 Aug 15;307(4):G437-44. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00148.2014. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

9.

Regional variation in distal esophagus distensibility assessed using the functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP).

Lin Z, Nicodème F, Boris L, Lin CY, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE.

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Nov;25(11):e765-71. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12205. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

10.

Evaluation of Esophageal Motor Function With High-resolution Manometry.

Conklin JL.

J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Jul;19(3):281-94. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.3.281. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

11.

Management of spastic disorders of the esophagus.

Roman S, Kahrilas PJ.

Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013 Mar;42(1):27-43. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2012.11.002. Epub 2013 Jan 4. Review.

12.

High-resolution manometry and esophageal pressure topography: filling the gaps of convention manometry.

Carlson DA, Pandolfino JE.

Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013 Mar;42(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Dec 27. Review.

13.

Partial recovery of peristalsis after myotomy for achalasia: more the rule than the exception.

Roman S, Kahrilas PJ, Mion F, Nealis TB, Soper NJ, Poncet G, Nicodème F, Hungness E, Pandolfino JE.

JAMA Surg. 2013 Feb;148(2):157-64. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamasurg.38.

14.

Localizing the contractile deceleration point (CDP) in patients with abnormal esophageal pressure topography.

Lin Z, Pandolfino JE, Xiao Y, Carlson D, Bidari K, Escobar G, Kahrilas PJ.

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Oct;24(10):972-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01959.x. Epub 2012 Jun 24.

15.

Interobserver variability in esophageal body measurements with high-resolution manometry among new physician users.

Singh ER, Rife C, Clayton S, Naas P, Nietert P, Castell DO.

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Feb;47(2):e12-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182557099.

16.

Effects of large hiatal hernias on esophageal peristalsis.

Roman S, Kahrilas PJ, Kia L, Luger D, Soper N, Pandolfino JE.

Arch Surg. 2012 Apr;147(4):352-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.17.

17.

The Chicago criteria for esophageal motility disorders: what has changed in the past 5 years?

Carlson DA, Pandolfino JE.

Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;28(4):395-402. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3283530f62. Review.

18.

Clinical applications of esophageal impedance monitoring and high-resolution manometry.

Kessing BF, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ.

Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2012 Jun;14(3):197-205. doi: 10.1007/s11894-012-0253-9. Review.

19.

Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography.

Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Schwizer W, Smout AJ; International High Resolution Manometry Working Group.

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Mar;24 Suppl 1:57-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01834.x. Review.

20.

Evaluation of esophageal contractile propagation using esophageal pressure topography.

Pandolfino JE, Sifrim D.

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Mar;24 Suppl 1:20-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01832.x. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center