Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 130

1.

The Untapped Power of Soda Taxes: Incentivizing Consumers, Generating Revenue, and Altering Corporate Behavior.

Roache SA, Gostin LO.

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jun 14;6(9):489-493. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.69.

2.

Financial incentives and purchase restrictions in a food benefit program affect the types of foods and beverages purchased: results from a randomized trial.

French SA, Rydell SA, Mitchell NR, Michael Oakes J, Elbel B, Harnack L.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Sep 16;14(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0585-9.

3.

The Potential for Federal Preemption of State and Local Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes.

Pomeranz JL, Mozaffarian D, Micha R.

Am J Prev Med. 2017 Nov;53(5):740-743. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.026. Epub 2017 Aug 29. No abstract available.

PMID:
28864129
4.

Improving food environments and tackling obesity: A realist systematic review of the policy success of regulatory interventions targeting population nutrition.

Sisnowski J, Street JM, Merlin T.

PLoS One. 2017 Aug 4;12(8):e0182581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182581. eCollection 2017. Review.

5.

Health and economic benefits of reducing sugar intake in the USA, including effects via non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a microsimulation model.

Vreman RA, Goodell AJ, Rodriguez LA, Porco TC, Lustig RH, Kahn JG.

BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 3;7(8):e013543. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013543.

6.

Effectiveness and equity of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation.

Basu S, Madsen K.

PLoS Med. 2017 Jun 27;14(6):e1002327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002327. eCollection 2017 Jun.

7.

Modelled health benefits of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax across different socioeconomic groups in Australia: A cost-effectiveness and equity analysis.

Lal A, Mantilla-Herrera AM, Veerman L, Backholer K, Sacks G, Moodie M, Siahpush M, Carter R, Peeters A.

PLoS Med. 2017 Jun 27;14(6):e1002326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002326. eCollection 2017 Jun.

8.

Expected population weight and diabetes impact of the 1-peso-per-litre tax to sugar sweetened beverages in Mexico.

Barrientos-Gutierrez T, Zepeda-Tello R, Rodrigues ER, Colchero-Aragonés A, Rojas-Martínez R, Lazcano-Ponce E, Hernández-Ávila M, Rivera-Dommarco J, Meza R.

PLoS One. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0176336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176336. eCollection 2017. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0191383.

9.

Global Trends in the Affordability of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, 1990-2016.

Blecher E, Liber AC, Drope JM, Nguyen B, Stoklosa M.

Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 May 4;14:E37. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160406.

10.

Obesity-related health impacts of fuel excise taxation- an evidence review and cost-effectiveness study.

Brown V, Moodie M, Cobiac L, Mantilla Herrera AM, Carter R.

BMC Public Health. 2017 May 4;17(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4271-2.

11.

Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.

Silver LD, Ng SW, Ryan-Ibarra S, Taillie LS, Induni M, Miles DR, Poti JM, Popkin BM.

PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr.

12.

Dietary quality changes in response to a sugar-sweetened beverage-reduction intervention: results from the Talking Health randomized controlled clinical trial.

Hedrick VE, Davy BM, You W, Porter KJ, Estabrooks PA, Zoellner JM.

Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Apr;105(4):824-833. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.144543. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

PMID:
28251935
13.

Price elasticity of the demand for soft drinks, other sugar-sweetened beverages and energy dense food in Chile.

Guerrero-López CM, Unar-Munguía M, Colchero MA.

BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 10;17(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4098-x.

14.

Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: impact on overweight and obesity in Germany.

Schwendicke F, Stolpe M.

BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3938-4.

15.

Impact of bottle size on in-home consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages: protocol for a feasibility and acceptability study.

Mantzari E, Hollands GJ, Pechey R, Jebb S, Marteau TM.

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015 Nov 20;1:41. eCollection 2015.

16.

Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Reduce Overweight and Obesity in Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Nakhimovsky SS, Feigl AB, Avila C, O'Sullivan G, Macgregor-Skinner E, Spranca M.

PLoS One. 2016 Sep 26;11(9):e0163358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163358. eCollection 2016.

17.

Impact of the Berkeley Excise Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption.

Falbe J, Thompson HR, Becker CM, Rojas N, McCulloch CE, Madsen KA.

Am J Public Health. 2016 Oct;106(10):1865-71. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303362. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

18.

Cardiovascular diseases in mega-countries: the challenges of the nutrition, physical activity and epidemiologic transitions, and the double burden of disease.

Barquera S, Pedroza-Tobias A, Medina C.

Curr Opin Lipidol. 2016 Aug;27(4):329-44. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000320. Review.

19.

Body Mass Index: Obesity, BMI, and Health: A Critical Review.

Nuttall FQ.

Nutr Today. 2015 May;50(3):117-128. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

20.

A Qualitative Study of Adolescent Views of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes, Michigan, 2014.

Krukowski CN, Conley KM, Sterling M, Rainville AJ.

Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 May 5;13:E60. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150543.

Supplemental Content

Support Center