Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 17

2.

Proteotoxic crisis, the ubiquitin-proteasome system, and cancer therapy.

Deshaies RJ.

BMC Biol. 2014 Nov 11;12:94. doi: 10.1186/s12915-014-0094-0. Review.

3.

A meta analysis of pancreatic microarray datasets yields new targets as cancer genes and biomarkers.

Goonesekere NC, Wang X, Ludwig L, Guda C.

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 16;9(4):e93046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093046.

4.

Aneuploidy: implications for protein homeostasis and disease.

Oromendia AB, Amon A.

Dis Model Mech. 2014 Jan;7(1):15-20. doi: 10.1242/dmm.013391. Review.

5.

Multi-layered cancer chromosomal instability phenotype.

Roschke AV, Rozenblum E.

Front Oncol. 2013 Dec 11;3:302. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00302. Review.

6.

Kinetochore function and chromosome segregation rely on critical residues in histones H3 and H4 in budding yeast.

Ng TM, Lenstra TL, Duggan N, Jiang S, Ceto S, Holstege FC, Dai J, Boeke JD, Biggins S.

Genetics. 2013 Nov;195(3):795-807. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.152082.

7.

Aneuploidy causes proteotoxic stress in yeast.

Oromendia AB, Dodgson SE, Amon A.

Genes Dev. 2012 Dec 15;26(24):2696-708. doi: 10.1101/gad.207407.112.

8.

Luminal A and luminal B (HER2 negative) subtypes of breast cancer consist of a mixture of tumors with different genotype.

Yanagawa M, Ikemot K, Kawauchi S, Furuya T, Yamamoto S, Oka M, Oga A, Nagashima Y, Sasaki K.

BMC Res Notes. 2012 Jul 25;5:376. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-376.

9.

Proteotoxic stress of cancer: implication of the heat-shock response in oncogenesis.

Dai C, Dai S, Cao J.

J Cell Physiol. 2012 Aug;227(8):2982-7. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24017. Review.

10.

Ploidy influences cellular responses to gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Jung PP, Fritsch ES, Blugeon C, Souciet JL, Potier S, Lemoine S, Schacherer J, de Montigny J.

BMC Genomics. 2011 Jun 28;12:331. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-331.

11.

Characterization of aneuploid populations with trisomy 7 and 20 derived from diploid human colonic epithelial cells.

Ly P, Eskiocak U, Kim SB, Roig AI, Hight SK, Lulla DR, Zou YS, Batten K, Wright WE, Shay JW.

Neoplasia. 2011 Apr;13(4):348-57.

12.

Thoughts on aneuploidy.

Torres EM, Williams BR, Tang YC, Amon A.

Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2010;75:445-51. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2010.75.025.

13.

Chromosome-wide aneuploidy study (CWAS) in workers exposed to an established leukemogen, benzene.

Zhang L, Lan Q, Guo W, Hubbard AE, Li G, Rappaport SM, McHale CM, Shen M, Ji Z, Vermeulen R, Yin S, Rothman N, Smith MT.

Carcinogenesis. 2011 Apr;32(4):605-12. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq286.

14.

Phenotypic consequences of aneuploidy in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Henry IM, Dilkes BP, Miller ES, Burkart-Waco D, Comai L.

Genetics. 2010 Dec;186(4):1231-45. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.121079.

15.

Identification of aneuploidy-tolerating mutations.

Torres EM, Dephoure N, Panneerselvam A, Tucker CM, Whittaker CA, Gygi SP, Dunham MJ, Amon A.

Cell. 2010 Oct 1;143(1):71-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.038.

16.

Targeting karyotypic complexity and chromosomal instability of cancer cells.

Roschke AV, Kirsch IR.

Curr Drug Targets. 2010 Oct;11(10):1341-50. Review.

17.

Modeling the aneuploidy control of cancer.

Li Y, Berg A, Wu LR, Wang Z, Chen G, Wu R.

BMC Cancer. 2010 Jul 1;10:346. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-346.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center