Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 34

1.

The influence of affective state on exogenous attention to emotional distractors: behavioral and electrophysiological correlates.

Carboni A, Kessel D, Capilla A, CarretiƩ L.

Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 14;7(1):8068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07249-x.

2.

Emotional cue validity effects: The role of neurocognitive responses to emotion.

Denefrio S, Simmons A, Jha A, Dennis-Tiwary TA.

PLoS One. 2017 Jul 6;12(7):e0179714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179714. eCollection 2017. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2017 Dec 7;12 (12 ):e0189560.

3.

Music-induced positive mood broadens the scope of auditory attention.

Putkinen V, Makkonen T, Eerola T.

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jul 1;12(7):1159-1168. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx038.

4.

A Normalization Framework for Emotional Attention.

Zhang X, Japee S, Safiullah Z, Mlynaryk N, Ungerleider LG.

PLoS Biol. 2016 Nov 21;14(11):e1002578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002578. eCollection 2016 Nov.

6.

Encoding of goal-relevant stimuli is strengthened by emotional arousal in memory.

Lee TH, Greening SG, Mather M.

Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 10;6:1173. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01173. eCollection 2015.

7.

Association with emotional information alters subsequent processing of neutral faces.

Riggs L, Fujioka T, Chan J, McQuiggan DA, Anderson AK, Ryan JD.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Dec 18;8:1001. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01001. eCollection 2014.

8.

Dissociable neural systems underwrite logical reasoning in the context of induced emotions with positive and negative valence.

Smith KW, Vartanian O, Goel V.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 23;8:736. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00736. eCollection 2014.

9.

The role of positive affect in pain and its treatment.

Finan PH, Garland EL.

Clin J Pain. 2015 Feb;31(2):177-87. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000092. Review.

10.

Affect-related synesthesias: a prospective view on their existence, expression and underlying mechanisms.

Dael N, Sierro G, Mohr C.

Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 18;4:754. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00754. Review.

11.
12.

How robust is the language architecture? The case of mood.

Van Berkum JJ, De Goede D, Van Alphen PM, Mulder ER, Kerstholt JH.

Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 22;4:505. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00505. eCollection 2013.

13.

Neural correlates of conflict control on facial expressions with a flanker paradigm.

Liu T, Xiao T, Shi JN.

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 24;8(7):e69683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069683. Print 2013.

14.

The relation between cognitive-perceptual schizotypal traits and the Ebbinghaus size-illusion is mediated by judgment time.

Bressan P, Kramer P.

Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 12;4:343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00343. eCollection 2013.

15.

Phenotypic variability in resting-state functional connectivity: current status.

Vaidya CJ, Gordon EM.

Brain Connect. 2013;3(2):99-120. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0110. Review.

16.

Smile to see the forest: Facially expressed positive emotions broaden cognition.

Johnson KJ, Waugh CE, Fredrickson BL.

Cogn Emot. 2010 Feb 19;24(2):299-321.

17.

Estimating the influence of life satisfaction and positive affect on later income using sibling fixed effects.

De Neve JE, Oswald AJ.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 4;109(49):19953-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211437109. Epub 2012 Nov 19.

18.

Happily distracted: mood and a benefit of attention dysregulation in older adults.

Biss RK, Weeks JC, Hasher L.

Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 16;3:399. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00399. eCollection 2012.

19.

Affective salience can reverse the effects of stimulus-driven salience on eye movements in complex scenes.

Niu Y, Todd RM, Anderson AK.

Front Psychol. 2012 Sep 25;3:336. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00336. eCollection 2012.

20.

The influence of affective states varying in motivational intensity on cognitive scope.

Harmon-Jones E, Gable PA, Price TF.

Front Integr Neurosci. 2012 Sep 10;6:73. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00073. eCollection 2012.

Supplemental Content

Support Center