Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 29

2.

Differential Activation Patterns in the Same Brain Region Led to Opposite Emotional States.

Shibata K, Watanabe T, Kawato M, Sasaki Y.

PLoS Biol. 2016 Sep 8;14(9):e1002546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002546. eCollection 2016 Sep.

3.

Characterization of Face-Selective Patches in Orbitofrontal Cortex.

Troiani V, Dougherty CC, Michael AM, Olson IR.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jun 14;10:279. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00279. eCollection 2016.

4.

Are Happy Faces Attractive? The Roles of Early vs. Late Processing.

Sun D, Chan CC, Fan J, Wu Y, Lee TM.

Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 30;6:1812. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01812. eCollection 2015.

5.

Visual attractiveness is leaky: the asymmetrical relationship between face and hair.

Saegusa C, Intoy J, Shimojo S.

Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 9;6:377. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00377. eCollection 2015.

6.

Evaluating aesthetic experience through personal-appearance styles: a behavioral and electrophysiological study.

Cheung MC, Law D, Yip J.

PLoS One. 2014 Dec 31;9(12):e115112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115112. eCollection 2014.

7.

Common and unique representations in pFC for face and place attractiveness.

Pegors TK, Kable JW, Chatterjee A, Epstein RA.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May;27(5):959-73. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00777. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

8.

Value is in the eye of the beholder: early visual cortex codes monetary value of objects during a diverted attention task.

Persichetti AS, Aguirre GK, Thompson-Schill SL.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 May;27(5):893-901. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00760. Epub 2014 Nov 12.

9.

Is moral beauty different from facial beauty? Evidence from an fMRI study.

Wang T, Mo L, Mo C, Tan LH, Cant JS, Zhong L, Cupchik G.

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Jun;10(6):814-23. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu123. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

10.

Cognitive control and unusual decisions about beauty: an fMRI study.

Flexas A, Rosselló J, de Miguel P, Nadal M, Munar E.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jul 21;8:520. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00520. eCollection 2014.

11.

Difference in brain activations during appreciating paintings and photographic analogs.

Mizokami Y, Terao T, Hatano K, Hoaki N, Kohno K, Araki Y, Kodama K, Makino M, Izumi T, Shimomura T, Fujiki M, Kochiyama T.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jul 7;8:478. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00478. eCollection 2014.

12.

Odor valence linearly modulates attractiveness, but not age assessment, of invariant facial features in a memory-based rating task.

Seubert J, Gregory KM, Chamberland J, Dessirier JM, Lundström JN.

PLoS One. 2014 May 29;9(5):e98347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098347. eCollection 2014.

13.

Assessing facial attractiveness: individual decisions and evolutionary constraints.

Kocsor F, Feldmann A, Bereczkei T, Kállai J.

Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol. 2013 Oct 3;3:21432. doi: 10.3402/snp.v3i0.21432. eCollection 2013.

15.

Neural correlates of explicit social judgments on vocal stimuli.

Hensel L, Bzdok D, Müller VI, Zilles K, Eickhoff SB.

Cereb Cortex. 2015 May;25(5):1152-62. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht307. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

16.

Timing and tuning for familiarity of cortical responses to faces.

Bobes MA, Lage Castellanos A, Quiñones I, García L, Valdes-Sosa M.

PLoS One. 2013 Oct 9;8(10):e76100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076100. eCollection 2013.

17.

Existential neuroscience: effects of mortality salience on the neurocognitive processing of attractive opposite-sex faces.

Silveira S, Graupmann V, Agthe M, Gutyrchik E, Blautzik J, Demirçapa I, Berndt A, Pöppel E, Frey D, Reiser M, Hennig-Fast K.

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Oct;9(10):1601-7. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst157. Epub 2013 Sep 27.

18.

Reward sensitivity to faces versus objects in children: an ERP study.

Stavropoulos KK, Carver LJ.

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Oct;9(10):1569-75. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst149. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

19.

Sex-differences of face coding: evidence from larger right hemispheric M170 in men and dipole source modelling.

Tiedt HO, Weber JE, Pauls A, Beier KM, Lueschow A.

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 9;8(7):e69107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069107. Print 2013.

20.

Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture.

Vartanian O, Navarrete G, Chatterjee A, Fich LB, Leder H, Modroño C, Nadal M, Rostrup N, Skov M.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 18;110 Suppl 2:10446-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301227110. Epub 2013 Jun 10.

Supplemental Content

Support Center