Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 67

1.

Association between the number of fungiform papillae on the tip of the tongue and sensory taste perception in children.

Jilani H, Ahrens W, Buchecker K, Russo P, Hebestreit A; IDEFICS consortium.

Food Nutr Res. 2017 Jul 26;61(1):1348865. doi: 10.1080/16546628.2017.1348865. eCollection 2017. Erratum in: Food Nutr Res. 2017 Aug 28;61(1):1369704.

2.

An automated system for the objective evaluation of human gustatory sensitivity using tongue biopotential recordings.

Pani D, Usai I, Cosseddu P, Melis M, Sollai G, Crnjar R, Tomassini Barbarossa I, Raffo L, Bonfiglio A.

PLoS One. 2017 Aug 2;12(8):e0177246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177246. eCollection 2017.

4.

Influence of biological, experiential and psychological factors in wine preference segmentation.

Pickering GJ, Hayes JE.

Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.. 2017 Jun;23(2):154-161. doi: 10.1111/ajgw.12266. Epub 2017 Jan 31.

PMID:
28579910
5.

First objective evaluation of taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), a paradigm gustatory stimulus in humans.

Sollai G, Melis M, Pani D, Cosseddu P, Usai I, Crnjar R, Bonfiglio A, Tomassini Barbarossa I.

Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 11;7:40353. doi: 10.1038/srep40353.

6.
7.

Psychophysical Evaluation of Sweetness Functions Across Multiple Sweeteners.

Low JY, McBride RL, Lacy KE, Keast RS.

Chem Senses. 2017 Feb;42(2):111-120. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjw109. Epub 2016 Oct 20.

8.

Is the Association Between Sweet and Bitter Perception due to Genetic Variation?

Hwang LD, Breslin PA, Reed DR, Zhu G, Martin NG, Wright MJ.

Chem Senses. 2016 Aug 9. pii: bjw083. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
27506221
9.

Characterizing and improving the sensory and hedonic responses to polyphenol-rich aronia berry juice.

Duffy VB, Rawal S, Park J, Brand MH, Sharafi M, Bolling BW.

Appetite. 2016 Dec 1;107:116-125. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.026. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

10.

Global diversity in the TAS2R38 bitter taste receptor: revisiting a classic evolutionary PROPosal.

Risso DS, Mezzavilla M, Pagani L, Robino A, Morini G, Tofanelli S, Carrai M, Campa D, Barale R, Caradonna F, Gasparini P, Luiselli D, Wooding S, Drayna D.

Sci Rep. 2016 May 3;6:25506. doi: 10.1038/srep25506.

11.

Salivary protein levels as a predictor of perceived astringency in model systems and solid foods.

Fleming EE, Ziegler GR, Hayes JE.

Physiol Behav. 2016 Sep 1;163:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.043. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

12.

Differential bitterness in capsaicin, piperine, and ethanol associates with polymorphisms in multiple bitter taste receptor genes.

Nolden AA, McGeary JE, Hayes JE.

Physiol Behav. 2016 Mar 15;156:117-27. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.017. Epub 2016 Jan 16.

13.

A Study on Prevalence of Phenyl Thiocarbamide (PTC) Taste Blindness Among Obese Individuals.

Veluswami D, Meena BA, Latha S, Fathima IG, Soundariya K, Selvi KS.

J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 May;9(5):CC04-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11821.5896. Epub 2015 May 1.

14.

Denver Papillae Protocol for Objective Analysis of Fungiform Papillae.

Nuessle TM, Garneau NL, Sloan MM, Santorico SA.

J Vis Exp. 2015 Jun 8;(100):e52860. doi: 10.3791/52860.

15.

The Relationships Between Common Measurements of Taste Function.

Webb J, Bolhuis DP, Cicerale S, Hayes JE, Keast R.

Chemosens Percept. 2015;8(1):11-18. Epub 2015 Jun 5.

16.

Quinine Bitterness and Grapefruit Liking Associate with Allelic Variants in TAS2R31.

Hayes JE, Feeney EL, Nolden AA, McGeary JE.

Chem Senses. 2015 Jul;40(6):437-43. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjv027. Epub 2015 May 29.

17.

Affective science perspectives on cancer control: strategically crafting a mutually beneficial research agenda.

Ferrer RA, Green PA, Barrett LF.

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 May;10(3):328-45. doi: 10.1177/1745691615576755.

18.

Genetic Vulnerability to Menthol Cigarette Preference in Women.

Oncken C, Feinn R, Covault J, Duffy V, Dornelas E, Kranzler HR, Sankey HZ.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Dec;17(12):1416-20. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv042. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

19.

The associations between 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) intensity and taste intensities differ by TAS2R38 haplotype.

Fischer ME, Cruickshanks KJ, Pankow JS, Pankratz N, Schubert CR, Huang GH, Klein BE, Klein R, Pinto A.

J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics. 2014;7(3):143-52. doi: 10.1159/000371552. Epub 2015 Jan 27.

20.

Relationships of PROP Taste Phenotype, Taste Receptor Genotype, and Oral Nicotine Replacement Use.

Ahijevych K, Tepper BJ, Graham MC, Holloman C, Matcham WA.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Sep;17(9):1149-55. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu281. Epub 2014 Dec 26.

Supplemental Content

Support Center