Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 22

1.

Computed tomography colonography for the practicing radiologist: A review of current recommendations on methodology and clinical indications.

Scalise P, Mantarro A, Pancrazi F, Neri E.

World J Radiol. 2016 May 28;8(5):472-83. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i5.472. Review.

2.

Assessment of the Incremental Benefit of Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) for Interpretation of CT Colonography by Experienced and Inexperienced Readers.

Boone D, Mallett S, McQuillan J, Taylor SA, Altman DG, Halligan S.

PLoS One. 2015 Sep 10;10(9):e0136624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136624. eCollection 2015.

3.

Comparison of semiparametric receiver operating characteristic models on observer data.

Samuelson FW, He X.

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2014 Oct;1(3):031004. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.1.3.031004. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

4.

A comparison of material decomposition techniques for dual-energy CT colonography.

Nasirudin RA, Tachibana R, Näppi JJ, Mei K, Kopp FK, Rummeny EJ, Yoshida H, Noël PB.

Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2015 Feb 21;9412. pii: 94124F.

5.

Multi-reader multi-case studies using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve as a measure of diagnostic accuracy: systematic review with a focus on quality of data reporting.

Dendumrongsup T, Plumb AA, Halligan S, Fanshawe TR, Altman DG, Mallett S.

PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e116018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116018. eCollection 2014. Review.

6.

CT colonography with computer-aided detection: recognizing the causes of false-positive reader results.

Trilisky I, Wroblewski K, Vannier MW, Horne JM, Dachman AH.

Radiographics. 2014 Nov-Dec;34(7):1885-905. doi: 10.1148/rg.347130053. Review. Erratum in: Radiographics. 2015 Mar-Apr;35(2):651.

7.

Exploration of analysis methods for diagnostic imaging tests: problems with ROC AUC and confidence scores in CT colonography.

Mallett S, Halligan S, Collins GS, Altman DG.

PLoS One. 2014 Oct 29;9(10):e107633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107633. eCollection 2014.

8.

Evaluation of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems.

Petrick N, Sahiner B, Armato SG 3rd, Bert A, Correale L, Delsanto S, Freedman MT, Fryd D, Gur D, Hadjiiski L, Huo Z, Jiang Y, Morra L, Paquerault S, Raykar V, Samuelson F, Summers RM, Tourassi G, Yoshida H, Zheng B, Zhou C, Chan HP.

Med Phys. 2013 Aug;40(8):087001. doi: 10.1118/1.4816310.

9.

A review of computer-aided diagnosis in thoracic and colonic imaging.

Suzuki K.

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2012 Sep;2(3):163-76. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2012.09.02.

10.

The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography.

Neri E, Halligan S, Hellström M, Lefere P, Mang T, Regge D, Stoker J, Taylor S, Laghi A; ESGAR CT Colonography Working Group.

Eur Radiol. 2013 Mar;23(3):720-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2632-x. Epub 2012 Sep 15.

11.

Strategies for improved interpretation of computer-aided detections for CT colonography utilizing distributed human intelligence.

McKenna MT, Wang S, Nguyen TB, Burns JE, Petrick N, Summers RM.

Med Image Anal. 2012 Aug;16(6):1280-92. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 May 3.

12.

Distributed human intelligence for colonic polyp classification in computer-aided detection for CT colonography.

Nguyen TB, Wang S, Anugu V, Rose N, McKenna M, Petrick N, Burns JE, Summers RM.

Radiology. 2012 Mar;262(3):824-33. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110938. Epub 2012 Jan 24.

13.

Automation bias: a systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators.

Goddard K, Roudsari A, Wyatt JC.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):121-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000089. Epub 2011 Jun 16. Review.

14.

Feasibility of simultaneous computed tomographic colonography and fully automated bone mineral densitometry in a single examination.

Summers RM, Baecher N, Yao J, Liu J, Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hill S.

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011 Mar-Apr;35(2):212-6. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182032537.

15.

ACRIN CT colonography trial: does reader's preference for primary two-dimensional versus primary three-dimensional interpretation affect performance?

Hara AK, Blevins M, Chen MH, Dachman AH, Kuo MD, Menias CO, Siewert B, Cheema JI, Obregon RG, Fidler JL, Zimmerman P, Horton KM, Coakley KJ, Iyer RB, Halvorsen RA Jr, Casola G, Yee J, Herman BA, Johnson CD.

Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):435-41. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11100250. Epub 2011 Mar 1.

16.

CT colonography: computer-assisted detection of colorectal cancer.

Robinson C, Halligan S, Iinuma G, Topping W, Punwani S, Honeyfield L, Taylor SA.

Br J Radiol. 2011 May;84(1001):435-40. doi: 10.1259/bjr/17848340. Epub 2010 Nov 16.

17.

Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial.

Dachman AH, Obuchowski NA, Hoffmeister JW, Hinshaw JL, Frew MI, Winter TC, Van Uitert RL, Periaswamy S, Summers RM, Hillman BJ.

Radiology. 2010 Sep;256(3):827-35. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091890. Epub 2010 Jul 27.

18.

CT colonography computer-aided polyp detection: Effect on radiologist observers of polyp identification by CAD on both the supine and prone scans.

Summers RM, Liu J, Rehani B, Stafford P, Brown L, Louie A, Barlow DS, Jensen DW, Cash B, Choi JR, Pickhardt PJ, Petrick N.

Acad Radiol. 2010 Aug;17(8):948-59. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.03.024. Epub 2010 Jun 12.

19.

Improving the accuracy of CTC interpretation: computer-aided detection.

Summers RM.

Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010 Apr;20(2):245-57. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.02.004. Review.

20.

Assessing operating characteristics of CAD algorithms in the absence of a gold standard.

Choudhury KR, Paik DS, Yi CA, Napel S, Roos J, Rubin GD.

Med Phys. 2010 Apr;37(4):1788-95.

Supplemental Content

Support Center