Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 13


Genuine participation in participant-centred research initiatives: the rhetoric and the potential reality.

Feeney O, Borry P, Felzmann H, Galvagni L, Haukkala A, Loi M, Nordal S, Rakic V, Riso B, Sterckx S, Vears D.

J Community Genet. 2018 Apr;9(2):133-142. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0342-4. Epub 2017 Oct 24.


Obtaining consumer perspectives using a citizens' jury: does the current country of origin labelling in Australia allow for informed food choices?

Withall E, Wilson AM, Henderson J, Tonkin E, Coveney J, Meyer SB, Clark J, McCullum D, Ankeny R, Ward PR.

BMC Public Health. 2016 Dec 9;16(1):1241.


CJCheck Stage 1: development and testing of a checklist for reporting community juries - Delphi process and analysis of studies published in 1996-2015.

Thomas R, Sims R, Degeling C, Street JM, Carter SM, Rychetnik L, Whitty JA, Wilson A, Ward P, Glasziou P.

Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):626-637. doi: 10.1111/hex.12493. Epub 2016 Oct 5.


Modified Policy-Delphi study for exploring obesity prevention priorities.

Haynes E, Palermo C, Reidlinger DP.

BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 6;6(9):e011788. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011788.


Involving a Citizens' Jury in Decisions on Individual Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Mosconi P, Colombo C, Satolli R, Carzaniga S; Steering Committee; Scientific Committee.

PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0143176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143176. eCollection 2016.


Deliberative democracy and cancer screening consent: a randomised control trial of the effect of a community jury on men's knowledge about and intentions to participate in PSA screening.

Thomas R, Glasziou P, Rychetnik L, Mackenzie G, Gardiner R, Doust J.

BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 24;4(12):e005691. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005691.


Cystic fibrosis: to screen or not to screen? Involving a Citizens' jury in decisions on screening carrier.

Mosconi P, Castellani C, Villani W, Satolli R.

Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):1956-67. doi: 10.1111/hex.12261. Epub 2014 Sep 9.


Harnessing the potential to quantify public preferences for healthcare priorities through citizens' juries.

Whitty JA, Burton P, Kendall E, Ratcliffe J, Wilson A, Littlejohns P, Scuffham PA.

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Jun 16;3(2):57-62. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.61. eCollection 2014 Jul.


A Community Jury on PSA screening: what do well-informed men want the government to do about prostate cancer screening--a qualitative analysis.

Rychetnik L, Doust J, Thomas R, Gardiner R, Mackenzie G, Glasziou P.

BMJ Open. 2014 Apr 30;4(4):e004682. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004682.


Women's views on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study.

Hersch J, Jansen J, Barratt A, Irwig L, Houssami N, Howard K, Dhillon H, McCaffery K.

BMJ. 2013 Jan 23;346:f158. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f158.


Including the public in pandemic planning: a deliberative approach.

Braunack-Mayer AJ, Street JM, Rogers WA, Givney R, Moss JR, Hiller JE; Flu Views Team.

BMC Public Health. 2010 Aug 19;10:501. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-501.


Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: a case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research.

De Vries R, Stanczyk A, Wall IF, Uhlmann R, Damschroder LJ, Kim SY.

Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jun;70(12):1896-1903. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.031. Epub 2010 Mar 16.


Assessing the public's views in research ethics controversies: deliberative democracy and bioethics as natural allies.

Kim SY, Wall IF, Stanczyk A, De Vries R.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009 Dec;4(4):3-16. doi: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.4.3.

Supplemental Content

Support Center