Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 47

1.

Coronary artery calcium score plays an important role for cardiovascular risk stratification in the statin benefit groups of asymptomatic individuals.

Lee DH, Youn HJ, Jung HO, Chang K, Choi YS, Jung JI.

Lipids Health Dis. 2017 Sep 12;16(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12944-017-0560-0.

2.

The safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of stress echocardiography in patients with high pretest probability of coronary artery disease.

Papachristidis A, Demarco DC, Roper D, Tsironis I, Papitsas M, Byrne J, Alfakih K, Monaghan MJ.

Open Heart. 2017 Jun 14;4(2):e000605. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000605. eCollection 2017.

3.

Estimation of Diastolic Filling Pressure with Cardiac CT in Comparison with Echocardiography Using Tissue Doppler Imaging: Determination of Optimal CT Reconstruction Parameters.

Hwang JS, Lee H, Lee B, Lee SJ, Jou SS, Lim HK, Suh J.

Korean J Radiol. 2017 Jul-Aug;18(4):632-642. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.632. Epub 2017 May 19.

4.

The cardiovascular risk factors associated with the plaque pattern on coronary computed tomographic angiography in subjects for health check-up.

Lee DH, Youn HJ, Jung HO, Chang K, Choi YS, Jung JI.

Clin Hypertens. 2017 Mar 2;23:6. doi: 10.1186/s40885-017-0062-4. eCollection 2017.

5.

Decreased Diagnostic Accuracy of Multislice Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Women with Atypical Angina Symptoms.

Jin WY, Zhao XJ, Chen H.

Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Sep 20;129(18):2191-8. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.189908.

6.

Noninvasive imaging modalities to visualize atherosclerotic plaques.

Shishikura D.

Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016 Aug;6(4):340-53. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2015.11.07. Review.

7.

Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography in the management of coronary artery disease: technology and clinical update.

Nakanishi R, Budoff MJ.

Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016 Jun 22;12:269-78. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S79632. eCollection 2016. Review.

8.

The evolving role of molecular imaging for coronary artery disease: where do we stand today?

Chua T.

Heart Asia. 2009 Jan 1;1(1):1-5. doi: 10.1136/ha.2008.000273. eCollection 2009. Review.

9.

Role of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Detection of Coronary Artery Disease according to Framingham Risk Score in Populations with Low to Intermediate Risks.

Kim WJ, Kwon CH, Han S, Lee WS, Kang JW, Ahn JM, Lee JY, Park DW, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Park SW, Park SJ.

J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Jun;31(6):902-8. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.6.902. Epub 2016 Apr 18.

10.

The Emerging Roles of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: Acute Chest Pain Evaluation and Screening for Asymptomatic Individuals.

Chien N, Wang TD, Chang YC, Lin PC, Tseng YH, Lee YF, Ko WC, Lee BC, Lee WJ.

Acta Cardiol Sin. 2016 Mar;32(2):167-73. Review.

11.

The comparison of high and standard definition computed tomography techniques regarding coronary artery imaging.

Aykut A, Bumin D, Omer Y, Mustafa K, Meltem C, Orhan C, Nisa U, Hikmet O, Hakan D, Mert K.

Afr Health Sci. 2015 Sep;15(3):925-30. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v15i3.29.

12.

Effect of iterative reconstruction on image quality in evaluating patients with coronary calcifications or stents during coronary computed tomography angiography: a pilot study.

Güler E, Vural V, Ünal E, Köse IÇ, Akata D, Karcaaltıncaba M, Hazırolan T.

Anatol J Cardiol. 2016 Feb;16(2):119-24. doi: 10.5152/akd.2015.5920. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

13.

Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of 5 image sets of dual-energy computed tomography for detecting first-pass myocardial perfusion defects compared with positron emission tomography.

Li W, Zhu X, Li J, Peng C, Chen N, Qi Z, Yang Q, Gao Y, Zhao Y, Sun K, Li K.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Dec;93(28):e329. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000329. Erratum in: Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jan;94(1):1.

14.

Multimodality imaging in apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Parisi R, Mirabella F, Secco GG, Fattori R.

World J Cardiol. 2014 Sep 26;6(9):916-23. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i9.916. Review.

15.

Cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography angiography for clinical imaging of stable coronary artery disease. Diagnostic classification and risk stratification.

Korosoglou G, Giusca S, Gitsioudis G, Erbel C, Katus HA.

Front Physiol. 2014 Aug 6;5:291. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00291. eCollection 2014. Review.

16.

Assessment of coronary artery disease using coronary computed tomography angiography and biochemical markers.

Gitsioudis G, Katus HA, Korosoglou G.

World J Cardiol. 2014 Jul 26;6(7):663-70. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i7.663. Review.

17.

Coronary plaque imaging by coronary computed tomography angiography.

Sato A.

World J Radiol. 2014 May 28;6(5):148-59. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.148. Review.

18.

Clinical Utility of Coronary CT Angiography with Stress Perfusion CT in Preoperative Cardiac Risk Evaluation.

Chang SA, Kim SM, Choi SH, Choe YH, Kim YW, Kim DK.

Korean Circ J. 2014 May;44(3):170-6. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2014.44.3.170. Epub 2014 May 20.

19.

Invasive and non-invasive fractional flow reserve index in validation of hemodynamic severity of intracoronary lesions.

Wasilewski J, Mirota K, Hawranek M, Poloński L.

Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2013;9(2):160-9. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2013.35452. Epub 2013 Jun 17.

20.

Coronary computed tomography angiography in the assessment of acute chest pain in the emergency room.

Prazeres CE, Cury RC, Carneiro AC, Rochitte CE.

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013 Dec;101(6):562-9. doi: 10.5935/abc.20130208. Epub 2013 Oct 22. Review. English, Portuguese.

Supplemental Content

Support Center