Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 146

1.

College Binge Drinking Associated with Decreased Frontal Activation to Negative Emotional Distractors during Inhibitory Control.

Cohen-Gilbert JE, Nickerson LD, Sneider JT, Oot EN, Seraikas AM, Rohan ML, Silveri MM.

Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 22;8:1650. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01650. eCollection 2017.

2.

Cognitive control in young adults with cannabis use disorder: An event-related brain potential study.

Maij DL, van de Wetering BJ, Franken IH.

J Psychopharmacol. 2017 Aug;31(8):1015-1026. doi: 10.1177/0269881117719262. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

3.

Elevated alcohol consumption following alcohol cue exposure is partially mediated by reduced inhibitory control and increased craving.

Field M, Jones A.

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4694-6. [Epub ahead of print]

4.

The association of prenatal cocaine exposure, externalizing behavior and adolescent substance use.

Minnes S, Min MO, Kim JY, Francis MW, Lang A, Wu M, Singer LT.

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Jul 1;176:33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.01.027. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

5.

Toward the Identification of a Specific Psychopathology of Substance Use Disorders.

Maremmani AGI, Pani PP, Rovai L, Bacciardi S, Maremmani I.

Front Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 27;8:68. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00068. eCollection 2017. Review.

6.

Executive functioning and substance use in adolescence: Neurobiological and behavioral perspectives.

Kim-Spoon J, Kahn RE, Lauharatanahirun N, Deater-Deckard K, Bickel WK, Chiu PH, King-Casas B.

Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jun;100:79-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 Apr 15. Review.

PMID:
28416327
7.

Do Executive Functions Predict Binge-Drinking Patterns? Evidence from a Longitudinal Study in Young Adulthood.

Bø R, Billieux J, Gjerde LC, Eilertsen EM, Landrø NI.

Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 31;8:489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00489. eCollection 2017.

8.

Associations Between Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Inhibitory Control and Amphetamine Reward Sensitivity.

Weafer J, Gorka SM, Hedeker D, Dzemidzic M, Kareken DA, Phan KL, de Wit H.

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017 Aug;42(9):1905-1913. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.61. Epub 2017 Mar 17.

PMID:
28303900
9.

Behavioral Control and Reward Sensitivity in Adolescents' Risk Taking Behavior: A Longitudinal TRAILS Study.

Peeters M, Oldehinkel T, Vollebergh W.

Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 17;8:231. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00231. eCollection 2017.

10.

Executive functions and substance use: Relations in late adolescence and early adulthood.

Gustavson DE, Stallings MC, Corley RP, Miyake A, Hewitt JK, Friedman NP.

J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Feb;126(2):257-270. doi: 10.1037/abn0000250. Epub 2017 Jan 2.

PMID:
28045282
11.

Acute alcohol effects on set-shifting and its moderation by baseline individual differences: a latent variable analysis.

Korucuoglu O, Sher KJ, Wood PK, Saults JS, Altamirano L, Miyake A, Bartholow BD.

Addiction. 2017 Mar;112(3):442-453. doi: 10.1111/add.13684. Epub 2016 Dec 18.

PMID:
27990739
12.

Associations among impulsivity, trauma history, and alcohol misuse within a young adult sample.

Bountress K, Adams ZW, Gilmore AK, Amstadter AB, Thomas S, Danielson CK.

Addict Behav. 2017 Jan;64:179-184. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.08.031. Epub 2016 Aug 26.

PMID:
27619009
13.

Behavioral and neural inhibitory control moderates the effects of reward sensitivity on adolescent substance use.

Kim-Spoon J, Deater-Deckard K, Holmes C, Lee J, Chiu P, King-Casas B.

Neuropsychologia. 2016 Oct;91:318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.028. Epub 2016 Aug 28.

14.

Do Executive Function and Impulsivity Predict Adolescent Health Behaviour after Accounting for Intelligence? Findings from the ALSPAC Cohort.

Stautz K, Pechey R, Couturier DL, Deary IJ, Marteau TM.

PLoS One. 2016 Aug 1;11(8):e0160512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160512. eCollection 2016.

15.

Insomnia symptoms and suicidality in the National Comorbidity Survey - Adolescent Supplement.

Wong MM, Brower KJ, Craun EA.

J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Oct;81:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

16.

Inseparability of Go and Stop in Inhibitory Control: Go Stimulus Discriminability Affects Stopping Behavior.

Ma N, Yu AJ.

Front Neurosci. 2016 Mar 22;10:54. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00054. eCollection 2016.

17.

Alcohol-Preferring P Rats Exhibit Elevated Motor Impulsivity Concomitant with Operant Responding and Self-Administration of Alcohol.

Beckwith SW, Czachowski CL.

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 May;40(5):1100-10. doi: 10.1111/acer.13044. Epub 2016 Mar 29.

18.

Separating the Association Between Inhibitory Control and Substance Use Prevalence Versus Quantity During Adolescence: A Hurdle Mixed-Effects Model Approach.

Riggs NR, Anthenien AM, Leventhal AM.

Subst Use Misuse. 2016;51(5):565-73. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2015.1126742. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

19.

The effect of alcohol consumption on the adolescent brain: A systematic review of MRI and fMRI studies of alcohol-using youth.

Ewing SW, Sakhardande A, Blakemore SJ.

Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Jul 5;5:420-37. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.06.011. eCollection 2014. Review.

20.

Executive Functions in Tobacco Dependence: Importance of Inhibitory Capacities.

Flaudias V, Picot MC, Lopez-Castroman J, Llorca PM, Schmitt A, Perriot J, Georgescu V, Courtet P, Quantin X, Guillaume S.

PLoS One. 2016 Mar 8;11(3):e0150940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150940. eCollection 2016.

Supplemental Content

Support Center