Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 139

1.

Choosing face: The curse of self in profile image selection.

White D, Sutherland CAM, Burton AL.

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0058-3. Epub 2017 Apr 14.

2.

Preference for facial averageness: Evidence for a common mechanism in human and macaque infants.

Damon F, Méary D, Quinn PC, Lee K, Simpson EA, Paukner A, Suomi SJ, Pascalis O.

Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 13;7:46303. doi: 10.1038/srep46303.

3.

Putative sex-specific human pheromones do not affect gender perception, attractiveness ratings or unfaithfulness judgements of opposite sex faces.

Hare RM, Schlatter S, Rhodes G, Simmons LW.

R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Mar 8;4(3):160831. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160831. eCollection 2017 Mar.

4.

Face familiarity promotes stable identity recognition: exploring face perception using serial dependence.

Kok R, Taubert J, Van der Burg E, Rhodes G, Alais D.

R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Mar 1;4(3):160685. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160685. eCollection 2017 Mar.

5.

A three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis of the facial esthetics of the Miss Korea pageant contestants.

Jang KS, Bayome M, Park JH, Park KH, Moon HB, Kook YA.

Korean J Orthod. 2017 Mar;47(2):87-99. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2017.47.2.87. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

6.

The relationship between health and mating success in humans.

Foo YZ, Simmons LW, Rhodes G.

R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jan 25;4(1):160603. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160603. eCollection 2017 Jan.

7.

Women prefer men who use metaphorical language when paying compliments in a romantic context.

Gao Z, Gao S, Xu L, Zheng X, Ma X, Luo L, Kendrick KM.

Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 9;7:40871. doi: 10.1038/srep40871.

8.

Optimal asymmetry and other motion parameters that characterise high-quality female dance.

McCarty K, Darwin H, Cornelissen PL, Saxton TK, Tovée MJ, Caplan N, Neave N.

Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 9;7:42435. doi: 10.1038/srep42435.

9.

Predictors of facial attractiveness and health in humans.

Foo YZ, Simmons LW, Rhodes G.

Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 3;7:39731. doi: 10.1038/srep39731.

10.

Age, Health and Attractiveness Perception of Virtual (Rendered) Human Hair.

Fink B, Hufschmidt C, Hirn T, Will S, McKelvey G, Lankhof J.

Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 22;7:1893. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01893. eCollection 2016.

11.

Brain responses to facial attractiveness induced by facial proportions: evidence from an fMRI study.

Shen H, Chau DK, Su J, Zeng LL, Jiang W, He J, Fan J, Hu D.

Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 25;6:35905. doi: 10.1038/srep35905.

12.

Facial Cosmetics and Attractiveness: Comparing the Effect Sizes of Professionally-Applied Cosmetics and Identity.

Jones AL, Kramer RS.

PLoS One. 2016 Oct 11;11(10):e0164218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164218. eCollection 2016.

13.

A Price Paid for Our Internal Strife: Escalated Intragroup Aggression and the Evolution of Ingroup Derogation.

Wu Q, Liu W, Li C, Li X, Zhou P.

Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 22;7:1453. eCollection 2016.

14.

How Beauty Determines Gaze! Facial Attractiveness and Gaze Duration in Images of Real World Scenes.

Leder H, Mitrovic A, Goller J.

Iperception. 2016 Aug 23;7(4):2041669516664355. eCollection 2016 Jul-Aug.

15.

Imprinting and flexibility in human face cognition.

Marcinkowska UM, Terraube J, Kaminski G.

Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 29;6:33545. doi: 10.1038/srep33545.

16.

The µ-opioid system promotes visual attention to faces and eyes.

Chelnokova O, Laeng B, Løseth G, Eikemo M, Willoch F, Leknes S.

Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Dec;11(12):1902-1909. Epub 2016 Aug 16.

17.

Looking for symmetry: fixational eye movements are biased by image mirror symmetry.

Meso AI, Montagnini A, Bell J, Masson GS.

J Neurophysiol. 2016 Sep 1;116(3):1250-60. doi: 10.1152/jn.01152.2015. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

PMID:
27306681
18.

The Role of Familiarity for Representations in Norm-Based Face Space.

Faerber SJ, Kaufmann JM, Leder H, Martin EM, Schweinberger SR.

PLoS One. 2016 May 11;11(5):e0155380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155380. eCollection 2016.

19.

Private and Shared Taste in Art and Face Appreciation.

Leder H, Goller J, Rigotti T, Forster M.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Apr 13;10:155. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00155. eCollection 2016.

20.

Health at the ballot box: disease threat does not predict attractiveness preference in British politicians.

Nilsonne G, Renberg A, Tamm S, Lekander M.

R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Mar 23;3(3):160049. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160049. eCollection 2016 Mar.

Supplemental Content

Support Center