Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 34

1.

Outcomes and toxicity of 313 prostate cancer patients receiving helical tomotherapy after radical prostatectomy.

Jensen L, Yuh B, Wong JYC, Schultheiss T, Cheng J, Ruel N, Twardowski P, Sampath S.

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2017 Aug 8;2(4):597-607. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2017.08.004. eCollection 2017 Oct-Dec.

2.

The Effects of Hospital Characteristics on Delays in Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Appalachian Communities: A Population-Based Study.

Louis CJ, Clark JR, Hillemeier MM, Camacho F, Yao N, Anderson RT.

J Rural Health. 2018 Feb;34 Suppl 1:s91-s103. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12226. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

PMID:
28102909
3.

Literature review of factors affecting continence after radical prostatectomy.

Pacik D, Fedorko M.

Saudi Med J. 2017 Jan;38(1):9-17. doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.1.15293. Review.

4.

The effect of minimally invasive prostatectomy on practice patterns of American urologists.

Oberlin DT, Flum AS, Lai JD, Meeks JJ.

Urol Oncol. 2016 Jun;34(6):255.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 28.

5.

Observations on Surgeons' Case Selection, Morbidity, and Mortality Following Board Certification.

Guidry CA, Newhook TE, Turrentine FE, Sohn MW, Sawyer RG, Jones RS.

Ann Surg. 2016 Mar;263(3):487-92. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001361.

6.

Morbidity of urologic surgical procedures: an analysis of rates, risk factors, and outcomes.

Patel HD, Ball MW, Cohen JE, Kates M, Pierorazio PM, Allaf ME.

Urology. 2015 Mar;85(3):552-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.034.

7.

Policy guidelines suggested for robot-assisted prostatectomy.

Valvo JR, Madeb R, Gilbert R, Nicholson C, Oleyourryk G, Perrapato S, Ricottone A, Roberts W, Eichel L.

J Robot Surg. 2007;1(3):173-6. doi: 10.1007/s11701-007-0031-0. Epub 2007 Jul 31. No abstract available.

8.

Transition from open to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with a reduction of positive surgical margins amongst private-practice-based urologists.

Madeb R, Golijanin D, Knopf J, Nicholson C, Cramer S, Tonetti F, Piccone K, Valvo JR, Eichel L.

J Robot Surg. 2007;1(2):145-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-007-0017-y. Epub 2007 Feb 23.

9.

Surgical quality is more than volume: the association between changing urologists and complications for patients with localized prostate cancer.

DuGoff EH, Bekelman JE, Stuart EA, Armstrong K, Pollack CE.

Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug;49(4):1165-83. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12148. Epub 2014 Jan 24.

10.

Treatment options for localized prostate cancer.

Keyes M, Crook J, Morton G, Vigneault E, Usmani N, Morris WJ.

Can Fam Physician. 2013 Dec;59(12):1269-74. Review.

11.

Canadian prostate brachytherapy in 2012.

Keyes M, Crook J, Morris WJ, Morton G, Pickles T, Usmani N, Vigneault E.

Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 Jan-Feb;7(1-2):51-8. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.218.

12.

A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy.

Trinh QD, Bjartell A, Freedland SJ, Hollenbeck BK, Hu JC, Shariat SF, Sun M, Vickers AJ.

Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):786-98. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.012. Epub 2013 Apr 19. Review.

13.

Variations in the quality of care at radical prostatectomy.

Trinh QD, Sammon J, Jhaveri J, Sun M, Ghani KR, Schmitges J, Jeong W, Peabody JO, Karakiewicz PI, Menon M.

Ther Adv Urol. 2012 Apr;4(2):61-75. doi: 10.1177/1756287211433187.

14.

Hospital racial composition and the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Pollack CE, Bekelman JE, Liao KJ, Armstrong K.

Cancer. 2011 Dec 15;117(24):5569-78. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26232. Epub 2011 Jun 20.

15.

Surgical margin status among men with organ-confined (pT2) prostate cancer: a population-based study.

Lawrentschuk N, Evans A, Srigley J, Chin JL, Bora B, Hunter A, McLeod R, Fleshner NE.

Can Urol Assoc J. 2011 Jun;5(3):161-6. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.10085.

16.

The impact of provider surgical volumes on survival in children with primary tumors of the central nervous system--a population-based study.

Solheim O, Salvesen Ø, Cappelen J, Johannesen TB.

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Jun;153(6):1219-29; discussion 1229. doi: 10.1007/s00701-011-0967-8. Epub 2011 Mar 10.

17.

Bigger is bigger. Better is better.

Solheim O, Cappelen J.

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Jun;153(6):1237-43; author reply 1245. doi: 10.1007/s00701-011-1030-5. Epub 2011 May 4. No abstract available.

18.

The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multicenter study.

Secin FP, Savage C, Abbou C, de La Taille A, Salomon L, Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, Janetschek G, Nassar F, Turk I, Vanni AJ, Gill IS, Koenig P, Kaouk JH, Martinez Pineiro L, Pansadoro V, Emiliozzi P, Bjartell A, Jiborn T, Eden C, Richards AJ, Van Velthoven R, Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Su LM, Pavlovich CP, Levinson AW, Touijer KA, Vickers A, Guillonneau B.

J Urol. 2010 Dec;184(6):2291-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Oct 16.

19.

Management of male urinary incontinence.

Moore KC, Lucas MG.

Indian J Urol. 2010 Apr;26(2):236-44. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.65398.

20.

Robotic surgery in urologic oncology: gathering the evidence.

Skolarus TA, Zhang Y, Hollenbeck BK.

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010 Aug;10(4):421-32. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.46. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center