Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 37

1.

Using semi-Markov processes to study timeliness and tests used in the diagnostic evaluation of suspected breast cancer.

Hubbard RA, Lange J, Zhang Y, Salim BA, Stroud JR, Inoue LY.

Stat Med. 2016 Nov 30;35(27):4980-4993. doi: 10.1002/sim.7055.

PMID:
27439856
2.

Developing a clinical utility framework to evaluate prediction models in radiogenomics.

Wu Y, Liu J, Del Rio AM, Page DC, Alagoz O, Peissig P, Onitilo AA, Burnside ES.

Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2015 Feb 21;9416. pii: 941617.

3.

Risk of breast cancer after false-positive results in mammographic screening.

Román M, Castells X, Hofvind S, von Euler-Chelpin M.

Cancer Med. 2016 Jun;5(6):1298-306. doi: 10.1002/cam4.646.

4.

Psychological Outcomes After a False Positive Mammogram: Preliminary Evidence for Ethnic Differences Across Time.

Molina Y, Beresford SA, Thompson B.

J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016 Feb 19. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
26896036
5.

Developing a utility decision framework to evaluate predictive models in breast cancer risk estimation.

Wu Y, Abbey CK, Chen X, Liu J, Page DC, Alagoz O, Peissig P, Onitilo AA, Burnside ES.

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2015 Oct;2(4):041005. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.4.041005.

6.

Towards personalized screening: Cumulative risk of breast cancer screening outcomes in women with and without a first-degree relative with a history of breast cancer.

Ripping TM, Hubbard RA, Otten JD, den Heeten GJ, Verbeek AL, Broeders MJ.

Int J Cancer. 2016 Apr 1;138(7):1619-25. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29912.

PMID:
26537645
7.

Diagnostic invasiveness and psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammography.

Heleno B, Siersma VD, Brodersen J.

Ann Fam Med. 2015 May-Jun;13(3):242-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.1762.

8.

Comparing sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography in the United States and Denmark.

Kemp Jacobsen K, O'Meara ES, Key D, S M Buist D, Kerlikowske K, Vejborg I, Sprague BL, Lynge E, von Euler-Chelpin M.

Int J Cancer. 2015 Nov 1;137(9):2198-207. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29593.

9.

Waiting time and the psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammography: cohort study.

Heleno B, Siersma V, Brodersen J.

J Negat Results Biomed. 2015 Apr 30;14:8. doi: 10.1186/s12952-015-0028-6.

10.

Breast cancer screening: an evidence-based update.

Fuller MS, Lee CI, Elmore JG.

Med Clin North Am. 2015 May;99(3):451-68. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2015.01.002. Review.

11.

Over-reassurance and undersupport after a 'false alarm': a systematic review of the impact on subsequent cancer symptom attribution and help seeking.

Renzi C, Whitaker KL, Wardle J.

BMJ Open. 2015 Feb 4;5(2):e007002. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007002. Review.

12.

Improving screening recall services for women with false-positive mammograms: a comparison of qualitative evidence with UK guidelines.

Bond M, Garside R, Hyde C.

BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 23;5(1):e005855. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005855.

13.

Online support: Impact on anxiety in women who experience an abnormal screening mammogram.

Obadina ET, Dubenske LL, McDowell HE, Atwood AK, Mayer DK, Woods RW, Gustafson DH, Burnside ES.

Breast. 2014 Dec;23(6):743-8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.08.002.

14.

Older women's experience with a benign breast biopsy—a mixed methods study.

Schonberg MA, Silliman RA, Ngo LH, Birdwell RL, Fein-Zachary V, Donato J, Marcantonio ER.

J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29(12):1631-40. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2981-z.

15.

Pursuing optimal thresholds to recommend breast biopsy by quantifying the value of tomosynthesis.

Wu Y, Alagoz O, Vanness DJ, Trentham-Dietz A, Burnside ES.

Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2014 Mar 11;9037:90370U.

16.

Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.

Tosteson AN, Fryback DG, Hammond CS, Hanna LG, Grove MR, Brown M, Wang Q, Lindfors K, Pisano ED.

JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun;174(6):954-61. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.981.

17.

Rapid point-of-care breath test for biomarkers of breast cancer and abnormal mammograms.

Phillips M, Beatty JD, Cataneo RN, Huston J, Kaplan PD, Lalisang RI, Lambin P, Lobbes MB, Mundada M, Pappas N, Patel U.

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 5;9(3):e90226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090226.

18.

Re-attendance after false-positive screening mammography: a population-based study in the Netherlands.

Setz-Pels W, Duijm LE, Coebergh JW, Rutten M, Nederend J, Voogd AC.

Br J Cancer. 2013 Oct 15;109(8):2044-50. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.573.

19.

Levels of state and trait anxiety in patients referred to ophthalmology by primary care clinicians: a cross sectional study.

Davey CJ, Harley C, Elliott DB.

PLoS One. 2013 Jun 13;8(6):e65708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065708.

20.

Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography.

Brodersen J, Siersma VD.

Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):106-15. doi: 10.1370/afm.1466.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center