Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 60

1.

A Selective Ensemble Classification Method Combining Mammography Images with Ultrasound Images for Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Cong J, Wei B, He Y, Yin Y, Zheng Y.

Comput Math Methods Med. 2017;2017:4896386. doi: 10.1155/2017/4896386. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

2.

Breast cancer policy in Latin America: account of achievements and challenges in five countries.

Nigenda G, Gonzalez-Robledo MC, Gonzalez-Robledo LM, Bejarano-Arias RM.

Global Health. 2016 Jul 12;12(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0177-5.

3.

Heterodyne frequency-domain multispectral diffuse optical tomography of breast cancer in the parallel-plane transmission geometry.

Ban HY, Schweiger M, Kavuri VC, Cochran JM, Xie L, Busch DR, Katrašnik J, Pathak S, Chung SH, Lee K, Choe R, Czerniecki BJ, Arridge SR, Yodh AG.

Med Phys. 2016 Jul;43(7):4383. doi: 10.1118/1.4953830.

4.

Dedicated Three-dimensional Breast Computed Tomography: Lesion Characteristic Perception by Radiologists.

Kuzmiak CM, Cole EB, Zeng D, Tuttle LA, Steed D, Pisano ED.

J Clin Imaging Sci. 2016 Mar 30;6:14. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.179428. eCollection 2016.

5.

Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study.

Miglioretti DL, Lange J, van den Broek JJ, Lee CI, van Ravesteyn NT, Ritley D, Kerlikowske K, Fenton JJ, Melnikow J, de Koning HJ, Hubbard RA.

Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):205-14. doi: 10.7326/M15-1241. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

6.

Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.

Miglioretti DL, Zhu W, Kerlikowske K, Sprague BL, Onega T, Buist DS, Henderson LM, Smith RA; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1069-77. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3084.

7.

Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation.

Gard CC, Aiello Bowles EJ, Miglioretti DL, Taplin SH, Rutter CM.

Breast J. 2015 Sep-Oct;21(5):481-9. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12443. Epub 2015 Jul 1.

8.
9.

Evaluation of clinical breast examination and breast ultrasonography among pregnant women in Abakaliki, Nigeria.

Ezeonu PO, Ajah LO, Onoh RC, Lawani LO, Enemuo VC, Agwu UM.

Onco Targets Ther. 2015 May 13;8:1025-9. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S83437. eCollection 2015.

10.

Five-year risk of interval-invasive second breast cancer.

Lee JM, Buist DS, Houssami N, Dowling EC, Halpern EF, Gazelle GS, Lehman CD, Henderson LM, Hubbard RA.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Apr 22;107(7). pii: djv109. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv109. Print 2015 Jul.

11.

Awareness of breast density and its impact on breast cancer detection and risk.

Rhodes DJ, Radecki Breitkopf C, Ziegenfuss JY, Jenkins SM, Vachon CM.

J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 1;33(10):1143-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.0325. Epub 2015 Mar 2.

12.

Breast cancer detection using sonography in women with mammographically dense breasts.

Okello J, Kisembo H, Bugeza S, Galukande M.

BMC Med Imaging. 2014 Dec 30;14:41. doi: 10.1186/s12880-014-0041-0.

13.

Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.

Sprague BL, Stout NK, Schechter C, van Ravesteyn NT, Cevik M, Alagoz O, Lee CI, van den Broek JJ, Miglioretti DL, Mandelblatt JS, de Koning HJ, Kerlikowske K, Lehman CD, Tosteson AN.

Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 3;162(3):157-66. doi: 10.7326/M14-0692.

14.

Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States.

Sprague BL, Gangnon RE, Burt V, Trentham-Dietz A, Hampton JM, Wellman RD, Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 12;106(10). pii: dju255. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju255. Print 2014 Oct.

15.

LAT-1 based primary breast cancer detection by [99m]Tc-labeled DTPA-bis-methionine scintimammography: first results using indigenously developed single vial kit preparation.

Sharma S, Singh B, Mishra AK, Rathod D, Hazari PP, Chuttani K, Chopra S, Singh PM, Abrar ML, Mittal BR, Singh G.

Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2014 Sep;29(7):283-8. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2014.1655.

16.

Update on new technologies in digital mammography.

Patterson SK, Roubidoux MA.

Int J Womens Health. 2014 Aug 14;6:781-8. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S49332. eCollection 2014. Review.

17.

Postmortem validation of breast density using dual-energy mammography.

Molloi S, Ducote JL, Ding H, Feig SA.

Med Phys. 2014 Aug;41(8):081917. doi: 10.1118/1.4890295.

18.

Breast density and mode of detection in relation to breast cancer specific survival: a cohort study.

Olsson Å, Sartor H, Borgquist S, Zackrisson S, Manjer J.

BMC Cancer. 2014 Mar 28;14:229. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-229.

19.

Bisphosphonate-functionalized gold nanoparticles for contrast-enhanced X-ray detection of breast microcalcifications.

Cole LE, Vargo-Gogola T, Roeder RK.

Biomaterials. 2014 Feb;35(7):2312-21. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.077. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

20.

'Suspect molecular signature' in blood as the indicator of undiagnosed breast cancer, cancer risk and targeted prevention.

Debald M, Yeghiazaryan K, Cebioglu M, Kuhn W, Schild HH, Golubnitschaja O.

EPMA J. 2013 Sep 16;4(1):22. doi: 10.1186/1878-5085-4-22.

Supplemental Content

Support Center