Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 10


A systematic review of sex differences in the placebo and the nocebo effect.

Vambheim SM, Flaten MA.

J Pain Res. 2017 Jul 31;10:1831-1839. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S134745. eCollection 2017. Review.


Pro and Contra: Provocation Tests in Drug Hypersensitivity.

Soyer O, Sahiner UM, Sekerel BE.

Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jul 4;18(7). pii: E1437. doi: 10.3390/ijms18071437. Review.


The effects of distraction on symptoms during drug provocation test.

Cildag S, Senturk T, Sargin G.

Clujul Med. 2017;90(1):18-21. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-688. Epub 2017 Jan 15.


The nocebo effect of drugs.

Planès S, Villier C, Mallaret M.

Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2016 Mar 17;4(2):e00208. doi: 10.1002/prp2.208. eCollection 2016 Apr.


Qualitative study of Nocebo Phenomenon (NP) involved in doctor-patient communication.

Ashraf B, Saaiq M, Zaman KU.

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Jun 2;3(1):23-7. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.54. eCollection 2014 Jun.


The magnitude of nocebo effects in pain: a meta-analysis.

Petersen GL, Finnerup NB, Colloca L, Amanzio M, Price DD, Jensen TS, Vase L.

Pain. 2014 Aug;155(8):1426-34. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.016. Epub 2014 Apr 26.


Nocebo phenomena in medicine: their relevance in everyday clinical practice.

Häuser W, Hansen E, Enck P.

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Jun;109(26):459-65. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0459. Epub 2012 Jun 29. Review.


The nocebo effect and its relevance for clinical practice.

Colloca L, Miller FG.

Psychosom Med. 2011 Sep;73(7):598-603. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182294a50. Epub 2011 Aug 23. Review.


Lessons learned from placebo groups in antidepressant trials.

Mora MS, Nestoriuc Y, Rief W.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 27;366(1572):1879-88. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0394. Review.


Diagnostic evaluation of food-related allergic diseases.

Eckman J, Saini SS, Hamilton RG.

Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2009 Oct 22;5(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-5-2.

Supplemental Content

Support Center