Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 46

1.

Pregnancy Outcomes after Treatment for Cervical Cancer Precursor Lesions: An Observational Study.

Weinmann S, Naleway A, Swamy G, Krishnarajah G, Arondekar B, Fernandez J, Myers E.

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 4;12(1):e0165276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165276. eCollection 2017. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2017 Feb 13;12 (2):e0172417.

2.

A polycomb-mediated epigenetic field defect precedes invasive cervical carcinoma.

Wijetunga NA, Ben-Dayan M, Tozour J, Burk RD, Schlecht NF, Einstein MH, Greally JM.

Oncotarget. 2016 Sep 20;7(38):62133-62143. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11390.

3.

Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Paraskevaidi M, Mitra A, Kalliala I, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Bennett P, Paraskevaidis E.

BMJ. 2016 Jul 28;354:i3633. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3633. Review.

4.

Clinical investigation of the safety and efficacy of a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treatment using a hyperthermia device that uses heat induced by alternating magnetic fields.

Koizumi K, Fujioka T, Yasuoka T, Inoue A, Uchikura Y, Tanaka H, Takagi K, Mori M, Koizumi M, Hashimoto H, Matsumoto T, Matsubara Y, Matsubara K, Nawa A.

Mol Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug;5(2):310-316. Epub 2016 Jun 13.

5.

Identification of appropriate cone length to avoid positive cone margin in high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Kawano K, Tsuda N, Nishio S, Yonemoto K, Tasaki K, Tasaki R, Ushijima K.

J Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(5):e54. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2016.27.e54. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

6.

See-and-Treat for High-Grade Cytology: Do Young Women Have Different Rates of High-Grade Histology?

Smith HJ, Leath CA 3rd, Huh WK, Erickson BK.

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2016 Jul;20(3):243-6. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000229.

PMID:
27243140
7.

Escharotic Treatment for ECC-positive CIN3 in Childbearing Years: A Case Report.

Windstar K, Dunlap C, Zwickey H.

Integr Med (Encinitas). 2014 Apr;13(2):43-9.

8.

Risk of preterm birth following surgical treatment for cervical disease: executive summary of a recent symposium.

Sasieni P, Castanon A, Landy R, Kyrgiou M, Kitchener H, Quigley M, Poon L, Shennan A, Hollingworth A, Soutter WP, Freeman-Wang T, Peebles D, Prendiville W, Patnick J.

BJOG. 2016 Aug;123(9):1426-9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13839. Epub 2015 Dec 23. No abstract available.

9.

How many preterm births in England are due to excision of the cervical transformation zone? Nested case control study.

Wuntakal R, Castanon A, Landy R, Sasieni P.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 29;15:232. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0664-3.

10.
12.

Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment?

Castañon A, Landy R, Brocklehurst P, Evans H, Peebles D, Singh N, Walker P, Patnick J, Sasieni P; PaCT Study Group..

BJOG. 2015 Aug;122(9):1191-9. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13398. Epub 2015 Apr 9.

13.

Human papillomavirus vaccine: a boon or curse.

Chawla S, Singh I, Jain R, Mehta B, Kumari S, Sahoo SS.

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(12):3509-12. doi: 10.4161/21645515.2014.980689.

14.

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of vaginal infections during pregnancy: an observational study.

Stout MJ, Frey HA, Tuuli MG, Cahill AG, Odibo AO, Roehl KA, Macones GA.

BJOG. 2015 Mar;122(4):545-51. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13252. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

15.

Natural history of histologically moderate cervical dysplasia in adolescent and young women.

Piris S, Bravo V, Alvarez C, Muñoz-Hernando L, Lorenzo-Hernando E, Oliver R, Marqueta-Marques L, Seoane-Ruiz JM, Tejerizo-Garcia A, Jiménez JS.

Onco Targets Ther. 2014 Nov 13;7:2101-6. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S69776. eCollection 2014.

16.

Risk of preterm delivery with increasing depth of excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in England: nested case-control study.

Castanon A, Landy R, Brocklehurst P, Evans H, Peebles D, Singh N, Walker P, Patnick J, Sasieni P; PaCT Study Group..

BMJ. 2014 Nov 5;349:g6223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6223. Erratum in: BMJ. 2014;349:g7406. Chin, S [corrected to China, S].

17.

Prediction of spontaneous regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia lesions grades 2 and 3 by proteomic analysis.

Uleberg KE, Ovestad IT, Munk AC, Brede C, van Diermen B, Gudlaugsson E, Janssen EA, Hjelle A, Baak JP.

Int J Proteomics. 2014;2014:129064. doi: 10.1155/2014/129064. Epub 2014 Jun 15.

18.

PAX1/SOX1 DNA methylation and cervical neoplasia detection: a Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (TGOG) study.

Lai HC, Ou YC, Chen TC, Huang HJ, Cheng YM, Chen CH, Chu TY, Hsu ST, Liu CB, Hung YC, Wen KC, Yu MH, Wang KL.

Cancer Med. 2014 Aug;3(4):1062-74. doi: 10.1002/cam4.253. Epub 2014 May 3.

19.

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Conner SN, Frey HA, Cahill AG, Macones GA, Colditz GA, Tuuli MG.

Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;123(4):752-61. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000174. Review.

20.

HPV E6/E7 RNA in situ hybridization signal patterns as biomarkers of three-tier cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade.

Evans MF, Peng Z, Clark KM, Adamson CS, Ma XJ, Wu X, Wang H, Luo Y, Cooper K.

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 13;9(3):e91142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091142. eCollection 2014.

Supplemental Content

Support Center