Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 44

1.

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus.

Bassler D, Mueller KF, Briel M, Kleijnen J, Marusic A, Wager E, Antes G, von Elm E, Altman DG, Meerpohl JJ; OPEN Consortium..

BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 21;6(1):e010024. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010024. Review.

2.

Buddy Study: Partners for better health in adolescents with type 2 diabetes.

Sylvetsky AC, Nandagopal R, Nguyen TT, Abegg MR, Nagarur M, Kaplowitz P, Rother KI.

World J Diabetes. 2015 Dec 25;6(18):1355-62. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i18.1355.

3.

Publication Bias in Methodological Computational Research.

Boulesteix AL, Stierle V, Hapfelmeier A.

Cancer Inform. 2015 Oct 15;14(Suppl 5):11-9. doi: 10.4137/CIN.S30747.

4.

Analysis of full-text publication and publishing predictors of abstracts presented at an Italian public health meeting (2005-2007).

Castaldi S, Giacometti M, Toigo W, Bert F, Siliquini R.

BMC Res Notes. 2015 Sep 29;8:492. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1463-7.

5.

Peer Review and the Public's Health.

DeAngelis CD.

Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):247-50. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12118. No abstract available.

6.

Authors report lack of time as main reason for unpublished research presented at biomedical conferences: a systematic review.

Scherer RW, Ugarte-Gil C, Schmucker C, Meerpohl JJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jul;68(7):803-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.027. Review.

7.

A retrospective analysis of dissemination biases in the brief alcohol intervention literature.

Tanner-Smith EE, Polanin JR.

Psychol Addict Behav. 2015 Mar;29(1):49-62. doi: 10.1037/adb0000014.

8.

Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: analysis of drug trials submitted to eight medical journals.

van Lent M, Overbeke J, Out HJ.

PLoS One. 2014 Aug 12;9(8):e104846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104846.

9.

Factors associated with publication of randomized phase iii cancer trials in journals with a high impact factor.

Tang PA, Pond GR, Welch S, Chen EX.

Curr Oncol. 2014 Aug;21(4):e564-72. doi: 10.3747/co.21.1937.

10.

Biased under-reporting of research reflects biased under-submission more than biased editorial rejection.

Chalmers I, Dickersin K.

F1000Res. 2013 Jan 2;2:1. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-1.v1.

11.

Authors are also reviewers: problems in assigning cause for missing negative studies.

Senn S.

F1000Res. 2013 Jan 21;2:17. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.2-17.v1.

12.

Misunderstanding publication bias: editors are not blameless after all.

Senn S.

F1000Res. 2012 Dec 4;1:59. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.1-59.v1.

13.

Recommendations for a uniform assessment of publication bias related to funding source.

van Lent M, Overbeke J, Out HJ.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 30;13:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-120.

14.

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review.

Dwan K, Gamble C, Williamson PR, Kirkham JJ; Reporting Bias Group..

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 5;8(7):e66844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066844. Review.

15.

Positive outcomes influence the rate and time to publication, but not the impact factor of publications of clinical trial results.

Suñé P, Suñé JM, Montoro JB.

PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054583.

16.

SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials.

Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Dickersin K, Hróbjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, Krleza-Jeric K, Laupacis A, Moher D.

BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.

18.

Publication bias in clinical trials of electronic health records.

Vawdrey DK, Hripcsak G.

J Biomed Inform. 2013 Feb;46(1):139-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.08.007.

19.

Effects of condom social marketing on condom use in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 1990-2010.

Sweat MD, Denison J, Kennedy C, Tedrow V, O'Reilly K.

Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Aug 1;90(8):613-622A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.094268. Review.

20.

From abstract to impact in cardiovascular research: factors predicting publication and citation.

Winnik S, Raptis DA, Walker JH, Hasun M, Speer T, Clavien PA, Komajda M, Bax JJ, Tendera M, Fox K, Van de Werf F, Mundow C, Lüscher TF, Ruschitzka F, Matter CM.

Eur Heart J. 2012 Dec;33(24):3034-45. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs113.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center