Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 18

1.

Spectral optical coherence tomography vs. fluorescein pattern for rigid gas-permeable lens fit.

Piotrowiak I, Kaluzny BJ, Danek B, Chwiędacz A, Sikorski BL, Malukiewicz G.

Med Sci Monit. 2014 Jul 4;20:1137-41. doi: 10.12659/MSM.890269.

2.

Measuring Corneal Thickness with SOCT, the Scheimpflug System, and Ultrasound Pachymetry.

Piotrowiak I, Soldanska B, Burduk M, Kaluzny BJ, Kaluzny J.

ISRN Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep 2;2012:869319. doi: 10.5402/2012/869319.

3.
4.

Anterior chamber angle evaluation with fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

Bald M, Li Y, Huang D.

J Ophthalmol. 2012;2012:103704. doi: 10.1155/2012/103704.

5.

Comparisons of morphologic characteristics between thin-flap LASIK and SBK.

Sun Y, Deng YP, Wang L, Huang YZ, Qiu LM.

Int J Ophthalmol. 2012;5(3):338-42. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.03.17.

6.

Reliability of RTVue, Visante, and slit-lamp adapted ultrasonic pachymetry for central corneal thickness measurement.

Hong JP, Nam SM, Kim TI, Seo KY, Lee SY, Meduri A, Kim EK.

Yonsei Med J. 2012 May;53(3):634-41. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.3.634.

7.

Optical sensing method for screening disease in melon seeds by using optical coherence tomography.

Lee C, Lee SY, Kim JY, Jung HY, Kim J.

Sensors (Basel). 2011;11(10):9467-77. doi: 10.3390/s111009467.

8.

Corneal topography from spectral optical coherence tomography (sOCT).

Ortiz S, Siedlecki D, Pérez-Merino P, Chia N, de Castro A, Szkulmowski M, Wojtkowski M, Marcos S.

Biomed Opt Express. 2011 Dec 1;2(12):3232-47. doi: 10.1364/BOE.2.003232.

9.

Comparison of the precision of the Topcon SP-3000P specular microscope and an ultrasound pachymeter.

Almubrad TM, Osuagwu UL, Alabbadi I, Ogbuehi KC.

Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:871-6. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S21247.

10.

Association between corneal biomechanical properties and myopia in Chinese subjects.

Jiang Z, Shen M, Mao G, Chen D, Wang J, Qu J, Lu F.

Eye (Lond). 2011 Aug;25(8):1083-9. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.104.

11.

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer and ultrasound pachymetry.

Ladi JS, Shah NA.

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep-Oct;58(5):385-8. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.67045.

12.

Repeatability of layered corneal pachymetry with the artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound arc-scanner.

Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ.

J Refract Surg. 2010 Sep;26(9):646-59. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20091105-01.

13.

Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography vs ultrasound pachymetry.

Kim HY, Budenz DL, Lee PS, Feuer WJ, Barton K.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;145(2):228-232.

14.

The characteristic features of optical coherence tomography in posterior uveitis.

Gallagher MJ, Yilmaz T, Cervantes-Castañeda RA, Foster CS.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Dec;91(12):1680-5. Review.

15.

A reference standard for the measurement of macular oedema.

Goatman KA.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep;90(9):1197-202. Review.

16.

Repeated measurements of dynamic tear distribution on the ocular surface after instillation of artificial tears.

Wang J, Aquavella J, Palakuru J, Chung S.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Aug;47(8):3325-9.

17.

Corneal pachymetry mapping with high-speed optical coherence tomography.

Li Y, Shekhar R, Huang D.

Ophthalmology. 2006 May;113(5):792-9.e2.

18.

Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness.

Miglior S, Albe E, Guareschi M, Mandelli G, Gomarasca S, Orzalesi N.

Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Feb;88(2):174-7.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center